Skip to main content
dryadopen

Data from: Re-examination of species limits in Aspergillus section Flavipedes using advanced species delimitation methods and description of four new species

<p><span>Since the last revision in 2015, the taxonomy of section <i>Flavipedes</i> evolved rapidly along with the availability of new species delimitation techniques. This study aims to re-evaluate the species boundaries of section <i>Flavipedes </i>members using modern delimitation methods applied to an extended set of strains (n=90) collected from various environments. The analysis used DNA sequences of three house-keeping genes (<i>benA</i>, <i>CaM</i>, <i>RPB2</i>) and consisted of two steps: application of several single-locus (GMYC, bGMYC, PTP, bPTP) and multi-locus (STACEY) species delimitation methods to sort the isolates into putative species, which were subsequently validated using DELINEATE software that was applied for the first time in fungal taxonomy. As a result, four new species are introduced, i.e. <i>A. alboluteus</i>, <i>A. alboviridis</i>, <i>A. inusitatus</i> and <i>A. lanuginosus</i>, and <i>A. capensis</i> is synonymized with <i>A. iizukae</i>. Phenotypic analyses were performed for the new species and their relatives and the results showed that the growth parameters at different temperatures and colonies characteristics were useful for differentiation of these taxa. The revised section harbors 18 species, most of them are known from soil. However, common species from the section are ecologically diverse, occurring in indoor environment (6 species), clinical samples (5 species), food and feed (4 species), droppings (4 species) and other less common substrates/environments. Due to the occurrence of section <i>Flavipedes</i> species in the clinical material/hospital environment, we also evaluated the susceptibility of 66 strains to six antifungals (Amphotericin B, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, Voriconazole, Isavuconazole, Terbinafine) using the reference EUCAST method. These results showed some potentially clinically relevant differences in susceptibility between species. For example, MICs higher than those observed for wild-type <i>A. fumigatus</i> were found for both triazoles and amphotericin B for <i>A. ardalensis, A. iizukae, </i>and<i> A. spelaeus</i> whereas <i>A. lanuginosus, A. luppiae, A. movilensis, A. neoflavipes, </i>and<i> A. olivimuriae</i> were comparable to or more susceptible as <i>A. fumigatus</i>. Finally, terbinafine was <i>in vitro</i> active against all species except <i>A. alboviridis</i>.</span></p>

ShareScore

28/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
0
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
4

Dataset details

Repository
dryad
Published
September 30, 2021
License
cc-zero
DOI
10.5061/dryad.dz08kprxj

Scored with release 0.9.0

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.