Dataset on vascular plants, Rhopalocera and Orthoptera of 35 industrial water-abstraction sites in France, including landscape and local variables

<p>Site&nbsp;: Site name</p> <p>X&nbsp;: X coordinate</p> <p>Y&nbsp;: Y coordinate</p> <p>Richness&nbsp;: Species richness taking into account individuals identified to the genus and species levels (based on data from the Vigie-Flore protocol for Flora (www.vigie-flore.fr), the STERF protocol for Rhopalocera (Manil and Henry, 2007) and the protocol of Lacoeuilhe et al. (2020) for Orthoptera)</p> <p>Richness2&nbsp;: Species richness taking into account only the individuals identified to the species level</p> <p>Shannon_Diversity&nbsp;: Shannon index</p> <p>Abondance&nbsp;: For Flora, abundance is the total number of quadrats in which each species is present, and for Rhopalocera and Orthoptera, abundance is the total number of individuals</p> <p>CWM_dispersal&nbsp;: Community weighted mean (Garnier et al., 2004) for dispersal&nbsp;:</p> <ul> <li>For Flora, maximum seed-releasing height as a proxy for dispersal</li> <li>For Rhopalocera and Orthoptera, 3 classes of dispersal (1-Low dispersal, 2-Medium dispersal, 3-High dispersal)</li> </ul> <p>CWM_specialisation&nbsp;: Community weighted mean (Garnier et al., 2004) for specialisation&nbsp;:</p> <ul> <li>For Flora, Index &theta;wb calculated using species co-occurrence data (Mobaied et al., 2015)</li> <li>For Rhopalocera, 4 classes of specialisation based on the optimal habitat of the caterpillar (1-Generalist species whose caterpillars grow in many types of habitat&nbsp;; 2-Moderately generalist species whose caterpillars grow mainly in the associated habitat&nbsp;; 3-Specialist species whose caterpillars grow mainly in the associated habitat&nbsp;; 4-Specialist species with a very localised distribution)</li> <li>For Orthoptera, 2 classes of specialisation based on moisture preferences (0-Generalist species (mesophilic), 1-Specialist species (xerothermic and hygrophilic))</li> </ul> <p>CWM_dep_pol&nbsp;: Percentage of times &ldquo;insects&rdquo; appears as a pollen vector for a given species across various databases (Martin, 2018)</p> <p>dPC_Flora_150m&nbsp;: Delta Probability of Connectivty (Saura &amp; Pascual-Hortal, 2007) calculated for Flora with dispersal distances of 150m</p> <p>dPC_Flora_500m&nbsp;: Delta Probability of Connectivty (Saura &amp; Pascual-Hortal, 2007) calculated for Flora with dispersal distances of 500m</p> <p>dPC_Rhopalocera_100m&nbsp;: Delta Probability of Connectivty (Saura &amp; Pascual-Hortal, 2007) calculated for Rhopalocera with dispersal distances of 100m</p> <p>dPC_Rhopalocera_300m&nbsp;: Delta Probability of Connectivty (Saura &amp; Pascual-Hortal, 2007) calculated for Rhopalocera with dispersal distances of 300m</p> <p>dPC_Orthoptera_100m&nbsp;: Delta Probability of Connectivty (Saura &amp; Pascual-Hortal, 2007) calculated for Orthoptera with dispersal distances of 100m</p> <p>dPC_ Orthoptera _300m&nbsp;: Delta Probability of Connectivty (Saura &amp; Pascual-Hortal, 2007) calculated for Orthoptera with dispersal distances of 300m</p> <p>IFT_Herbicides_100m&nbsp;: Average Treatment Frequency Indice for herbicides within a radius of 100m</p> <p>IFT_Herbicides_300m&nbsp;: Average Treatment Frequency Indice for herbicides within a radius of 300m</p> <p>Soil&nbsp;: Qualitative variable, divided into 2 categories: clay vs. sandy soil</p> <p>Humidity&nbsp;: Semi-quantitative variable based on site habitat vegetation, divided into 3 categories: 1 (xerophilous), 2 (mesoxerophilous), 3 (meso-hygrophylous)</p> <p>Floral_dispo&nbsp;: Average cover of flowering plants over the 4 visits on the site (%)</p> <p>Low_herbaceous_cover&nbsp;: Low herbaceous cover (&lt;20 cm) on the site (%)</p> <p>Hight_herbaceous_cover&nbsp;: High herbaceous cover (&gt;40 cm) on the site (%)</p>