Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Uncertainty Analysis of Digital Elevation Models by Spatial Inference From Stable Terrain – Dataset

<p><strong>Dataset of <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2022.3188922">Hugonnet et al. (2022),&nbsp;Uncertainty Analysis of Digital Elevation Models by Spatial Inference From Stable Terrain</a>.</strong></p> <p>The data is composed of:</p> <ul> <li><strong>For the Mont-Blanc case study: </strong>the Pl&eacute;iades reference DEM, the SPOT-6 DEM,&nbsp;the Pl&eacute;iades&ndash;SPOT-6 elevation difference, and the forest mask generated from the ESA CCI landcover (delainey polygonization);</li> <li><strong>For the&nbsp;Northern Patagonian Icefield&nbsp;case study: </strong>the ASTER reference DEM, the SPOT-5 DEM, the ASTER&ndash;SPOT-5&nbsp;elevation difference, and the quality of stereo-correlation of the ASTER DEM from MicMac.</li> </ul> <p>The filenames correspond to those used in the <strong>associated GitHub repository</strong>:&nbsp;<a href="https://github.com/rhugonnet/dem_error_study">https://github.com/rhugonnet/dem_error_study</a>.&nbsp;The shapefiles used for masking glaciers&nbsp;are available directly from the <strong>Randolph Glacier Inventory 6.0</strong> at <a href="https://www.glims.org/RGI/">https://www.glims.org/RGI/</a>.</p> <p>The date of the DEMs is in their original format: <strong>year-month-day for all but ASTER</strong> that has the original naming of <a href="https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/ast_l1av003/">AST L1A products</a>.&nbsp;<strong>Units are meters</strong> for the DEMs and elevation differences, <strong>and percentages</strong> for the quality of stereo-correlation.</p>

ShareScore

52/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
20
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
12

Topics