FIGURE 12. a in Revising the taxonomy of Darevskia valentini (Boettger, 1892) and Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) (Squamata, Lacertidae): a Morpho-Phylogenetic integrated study in a complex Anatolian scenario
FIGURE 12. a) Darevskia spitzenbergerae wernermayeri ssp. nov. (Paratype; nº 12, Male; Başeğmez Village, Çaldıran, Turkey); b) Darevskia mirabilis stat. nov. (Paratype; nº 5, Female; Ovit Pass, Kaçkar Mountains, Rize, Turkey); c) Darevskia rudis bolkardaghica (Paratype; nº 1, Male; Karagöl, Ulukışla, Niğde, Central Anatolia, Turkey); d) Darevskia rudis lantzicyreni comb. nov. (nº 23, male; Kümbet Village, Zara, Turkey); e) Darevskia josefschmidtleri sp. nov. (Paratype; nº 20, Male; Yukarınarlıca Village, Çatak, Van, Turkey); f) Darevskia valentini (nº 9, Male; Tepeler Village, Ardahan, Turkey) and temporal area of an Armenian specimen (Karvansaray, Martuni District, Armenia); g) Darevskia spitzenbergerae spitzenbergerae stat. et comb. nov. (nº 1, Male; Cilo Sat Mountains, Hakkari, Turkey)- Also, temporal area of other specimen from the same locality. The new nomenclature proposed in the text is used.
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0