Natrolite - Sample 2 NanED Round Robin, Data: ESR8 & ESR9
<p><em><strong>Natrolite</strong></em></p> <p>The following submission contains the data collection and processing for the sample natrolite under the NanEd round-robin project. Precession Electron Diffraction (PED) was used to collect the dataset on the target crystal. The dataset was processed with PETS2 and eADT software. The table below summarizes the data collection parameters for the dataset.</p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>General information:</strong></p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Project</p> </td> <td> <p>NanED (www.naned.eu)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>ESR Project</p> </td> <td> <p>ESR8 & ESR9 - Round Robin</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Project Label</p> </td> <td> <p>RR2</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Sample Label</p> </td> <td> <p>RR2-S2_ PRAHA</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Data set Label</p> </td> <td> <p>RR2_Cry2</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Instrumental:</strong></p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Instrument</p> </td> <td> <p>FEI TECNAI F30 STWIN</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Radiation source</p> </td> <td> <p>FEG</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Accelerating voltage</p> </td> <td> <p>300 kV</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Wavelength</p> </td> <td> <p>0.0197 Å</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Probe Type</p> </td> <td> <p>Nanodiffraction</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Beam Diameter</p> </td> <td> <p>200nm</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Beam Convergence</p> </td> <td> <p>Semi-parallel beam</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Detector</p> </td> <td> <p>US4000 - CCD camera GATAN (16-bit) (bottom mounted)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Number of pixels in the image</p> </td> <td> <p>2048 x 2048</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Pixel size</p> </td> <td> <p>15 µm x 15 µm</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Camera Length / Effective Camera Length</p> </td> <td> <p>750 mm / 702 mm</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Calibration constant (not corrected for Effective Camera length)</p> </td> <td> <p>0.00152 Å<sup>-1</sup>/pixel</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> Hardware Binning</p> </td> <td> <p>2 </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Sample description:</strong></p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Name</p> </td> <td> <p>Natrolite</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Chemical composition</p> </td> <td> <p>Na<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>3</sub>O<sub>10</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Sample source</p> </td> <td> <p>Natural sample from Marianska Skala, Usti nad Labem, Czechia</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Sample preparation</p> </td> <td> <p>The crystals were grinded in an agata mortar and part of the resulting powder was loaded on the carbon side of a carbon-coated copper grid (300 mesh).</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Experimental:</strong></p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Data Type</p> </td> <td> <p>Electron diffraction data - 3D ED</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Data collection method</p> </td> <td> <p>Precession</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Temperature (K) used during data collection</p> </td> <td> <p>293 K</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Number of crystals contributing to the data set</p> </td> <td> <p>1</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Number of experimental frames</p> </td> <td> <p>131</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>tilt range, tilt step, tilt per frame</p> </td> <td> <p>-65° to +65°, 1°, 0°</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Precession angle</p> </td> <td> <p>1°</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Exposure time per frame</p> </td> <td> <p>250 ms</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Software:</strong></p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Software used for the data collection</p> </td> <td> <p>Gatan Digital Micrograph software</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Software used for processing</p> </td> <td> <p>PETS2 and eADT</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Authorship and bibliography</strong></p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Author(s) of the data</p> </td> <td> <p>Laura Gemmrich Hernández (ESR8) & Marco Santucci (ESR9)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Related data</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Publication(s)</p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Files and data formats</strong></p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Image folder</p> </td> <td> <p>img: Folder containing images of the diffraction pattern from each frame.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Image format</p> </td> <td> <p>tiff_16bit_unsigned</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p> </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 8
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 4