Skip to main content
zenodoopen

98 selected publications analysed in-depth in the context of a systematic literature review on Computational Thinking in compulsory education

<p>This is the list of the <strong>98 publications from between 2016 and 2021 </strong>analysed in-depth through a review matrix in the context of the <strong>&quot;</strong><a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347">Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education: State of Play and</a> <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128347">&nbsp;Practices from the Field</a><strong>&quot;</strong> <strong>research study.</strong> The <a href="https://computhink2study.eu/">study</a> was designed, funded, and followed by the European Commission&rsquo;s Joint Research Centre (JRC) to investigate <strong>how Computational Thinking (CT) is currently positioned within compulsory school education in Europe&rsquo;s various Member States, as well as outside the EU</strong>. The study was carried out from April to December 2021 by the Institute for Educational Technology of the Italian National Research Council (CNR-ITD), together with European Schoolnet (EUN) and Vilnius University (VU).</p> <p>Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Dagienė, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M.A., Jasutė, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., &amp; Stupurienė, G. (2022). <em>Reviewing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education</em>. Publications Office of the European Union. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2760/126955">https://doi.org/10.2760/126955</a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

ShareScore

40/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
4

Topics