Skip to main content
dryadopen

Fitting and evaluating univariate and multivariate models of within-lineage evolution

<p><span>The nature of phenotypic evolution within lineages is central to many unresolved questions in paleontology and evolutionary biology. Analyses of evolutionary time-series of ancestor-descendant populations in the fossil record are likely to make important contributions to many of these debates. However, the limited number of models that have been applied to these types of data may restrict our ability to interpret phenotypic evolution in the fossil record. </span>Using uni- and multivariate models of trait evolution <span>that make different assumptions regarding</span> <span>the </span>dynamic<span>s of the</span> adaptive landscape, I evaluate contrasting hypotheses to explain evolution of size in the radiolarian <em><span>Eucyrtidium calvertense</span></em> and armor in the stickleback <em>Gaserosteus doryssus</em>. Body size evolution in <span><em>E. calvertense</em> </span><span>is best explained by a model where the lineage evolves as a consequence of a shift in the adaptive landscape that coincides with the initiation of neosympatry with its sister lineage. Multivariate evolution of armor traits in a stickleback lineage (<em>Gasterosteus</em> <em>doryssus</em>) shows evidence of adaptation towards independent optima on the adaptive landscape at the same time as traits change in a correlated fashion. The fitted models are available in an R package evoTS, which builds on the commonly used paleoTS framework.</span></p>

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
0
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
8