zenodoopen

Natrolite - NanED Round Robin, Data: ESR14 & ESR15

Natrolite The following submission contains the data collection and processing for the sample Natrolite under the NanEd round-robin project.   Many crystals were identified, and data were collected using the continuous rotation data acquisition technique. All the data sets were processed with Dials software. The table below summarizes the data collection parameters.   <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>  General Information </td> <td>   </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Project </td> <td>    NanED (www.naned.eu) </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  ESR Project </td> <td>    ESR14 & ESR15 - Round Robin </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Project Label </td> <td>    RR2 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Sample Label </td> <td>    RR2-S2-PRAHA </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Data set Label </td> <td>     RR2-S2_ PRAHA_CROT </td> </tr> <tr> <td>   </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Instrumental </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Instrument </td> <td>      JEOL F200 TEM </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Radiation source </td> <td>      Schottky FEG </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Accelerating voltage </td> <td>      200 kV </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Wavelength </td> <td>      0.0251 Å </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Probe Type </td> <td>      Nanodiffraction </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Beam Diameter </td> <td>      CLA4 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Beam Convergence </td> <td>      Parallel beam </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Detector </td> <td>      ASI Cheetah M3 retractable hybrid pixel detecor </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Number of pixels in the Image </td> <td>      515x515 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Pixel size </td> <td>     55µm x 55µm </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Camera Length / Effective Camera Length </td> <td>     440-460 mm </td> </tr> <tr> <td>   </td> <td>   </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Sample description: </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Name </td> <td>      Natrolite </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Chemical composition </td> <td>      Na2Al2Si3O10·2H2O </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Sample source </td> <td>      Natural sample from Marianska Skala, Usti nad Labem, Czechia </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Sample preparation </td> <td>      The crystals were grinded between two glass slides and part of the resulting powder was loaded on top of a carbon-coated copper grid. </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Experimental: </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Data Type </td> <td>     Electron diffraction data - 3D ED </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Data collection method </td> <td>     Continuous Rotation </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Temperature (K) used during data collection </td> <td>      293 K </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Number of crystals contributing to the data set </td> <td>      Multiple </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Number of experimental frames </td> <td>      450 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Tilt range, tilt step, tilt per frame </td> <td>      -30° to +30°, 0.13°, 0.13° </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Exposure time per frame </td> <td>      100 ms </td> </tr> <tr> <td>   </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Software: </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Software used for the data collection </td> <td>        CEOS CEFID energy filter controlling program </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Software used for processing </td> <td>        DIALS </td> </tr> <tr> <td>   </td> <td>   </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Authorship and bibliography </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Author(s) of the data </td> <td>         Senik Matinyan (ESR14) & Amatassalam Ben Meriem (ESR15) </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Related data </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Publication(s) </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>   </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Files and data formats </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Image folder </td> <td>       Set1_to_3: Folder containing images of the diffraction pattern from  each frame.      Note : Set1: reverse: 30° to -30° data collection </td> </tr> <tr> <td>  Image format </td> <td>     .img </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

ShareScore

24/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship: 4
Harmonization: 4
Access: 16
Reuse readiness: 0
Engagement: 0