Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Genome-scale community modelling reveals key metabolic cross-feedings in epipelagic bacterioplankton communities (Supplementary Materials)

<p>A comprehensive catalog of 19,791 marine prokaryotic isolates (WGS), single-amplified genomes (SAGs) and metagenomic-assembled genomes (MAGs) compiled from MarRef v4.0 (N=943, mostly high-quality WGS), MarDB v4.0 (N=12,963), and the aquatic representative genomes from the ProGenomes database v1.0 (N=566). This collection of well-documented genomes was complemented by 5,319 MAGs assembled from four distinct studies, namely: Parks et al. 2017 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7">DOI</a>; N=1,765; downloaded from EBI), Tully et al. 2017/2018 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3558">DOI</a> and <a href="https://10.1038/sdata.2017.203">DOI</a>; N=2,597; downloaded from EBI), and Delmont et al. 2018 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0176-9">DOI</a>; N=957; downloaded from FIGSHARE). The Parks et al. study contained genomes reconstructed from non-marine biomes. Thus, a selection of 1,765 genomes was extracted by searching for specific keywords: &ldquo;tara|marine|sea|ocean|mediterranean&rdquo; (case insensitive). Note that depending on their study of origin, included MAGs may have been reconstructed using different assembling and binning methods.</p> <p>The archive includes:</p> <ul> <li>a metadata file describing the quality and redundancy of the genomes named `EcoSysMic_metadata.tsv`</li> <li>sequences of the 19,791 (redundant) genomes in `All/WGS`</li> <li>companion files in `All/Data` and `dRep95/Data` (see Methods in the associated paper), including <ul> <li>predicted CDS and EggNOG functional annotations</li> <li>predicted GTDB taxonomy</li> <li>CarveMe reconstructed metabolic models and their MEMOTE quality</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>The 7,658 non-redundant species-level genomes (delineated by a 95% ANI threshold over 60% of genome length) that were used in the associated paper are defined by the column `is_drep95` in the metadata file.</p>

ShareScore

44/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
8

Topics