Comparison between ozone column depths and methane lifetimes computed by 1-D and 3-D models at different atmospheric O2 Levels
<p>Recently, Cooke et al. (2022) used a 3-D coupled chemistry-climate model (WACCM6) to calculate ozone column depths at varied atmospheric O<sub>2</sub> levels. They argued that previous 1-D photochemical model studies, e.g., Segura et al. (2003), may have overestimated the ozone column depth at low pO<sub>2</sub>, and hence also overestimated the lifetime of methane. We have compared new simulations from an updated version of the Segura et al. model with those from WACCM6, together with some results from another 1-D and 3-D model. The discrepancy in ozone column depths is likely due to multiple interacting parameters, including lower boundary conditions, vertical and meridional transport rates, and different chemical mechanisms, especially the treatment of O<sub>2</sub> photolysis in the Schumann-Runge (SR) bands (175-205 nm). The discrepancy in tropospheric OH concentrations and methane lifetime between WACCM6 and the 1-D model at low pO<sub>2</sub> is reduced when absorption from CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O in this wavelength region is included in WACCM6. Including scattering in the SR bands may further reduce this difference. Resolving these issues can be accomplished by developing an accurate parameterization for O<sub>2</sub> photolysis in the SR bands and then repeating these calculations in the various models. Work is already underway to this end.</p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 12
- Access
- 12
- Reuse readiness
- 0
- Engagement
- 8
Topics
ScienceDex for faculty
Your academic CV and NIH biosketch
Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.