Simple Biosphere model version 4.2 (SiB4) simulations for the present day atmosphere with 500 ppt OCS and the two OCS geoengineering scenarios with 4.8 ppb and 35.5 ppb OCS.

<p>This dataset was prepared for a publication by von Hobe et al. (2023):</p> <p><strong>Comment on &ldquo;An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide&rdquo; by Quaglia et al. (2022)</strong></p> <p>In that publication, the data are displayed in Figures 1 and 2.</p> <p>Simple Biosphere model version 4.2 (SiB4, Haynes et al., 2019; Sellers et al., 1986) was used to calculate (i) the average increase in evapotranspiration anticipated under an elevated OCS scenario for the years 2000-2021 on a 0.5 &deg; latitude x 0.5 &deg; longitude grid and (ii) OCS uptake by plants and soils, per month, at baseline (500 ppt) and elevated (4.8 and 35.5 ppb) OCS levels averaged over the years 2000-2021.</p> <p>- - - - - - - - - - -</p> <p><em>File 1: vonHobe_et_al_2023_CarbonylSulfideGeoengineeringScenarios_DeltaEvapotranspiration_GloballyGridded_SiB4.nc</em></p> <p>File Format:</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; netCDF</p> <p>Index Variables:</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; latitude</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; longitude</p> <p>Parameters:</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; percent_diff_et:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; relative increase in % of evapotranspiration in a scenario where 20% of terrestrial plants exhibit a 50% increase in stomatal conductance under high OCS</p> <p>- - - - - -</p> <p><em>File 2: vonHobe_et_al_2023_CarbonylSulfideGeoengineeringScenarios_BiosphereUptake_MonthlyIntegrated_SiB4.csv</em></p> <p>File Format:</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; comma delimited text file (.csv)</p> <p>Index Variable:</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; time: monthly, format m/dd/yy</p> <p>Parameters:</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ocs_veg_base:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; simulated monthly OCS uptake by terrestrial vegetation at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 500 ppt</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ocs_soil_base:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; simulated monthly OCS uptake by soils at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 500 ppt</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ocs_veg_4.8ppb:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; simulated monthly OCS uptake by terrestrial vegetation at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 4.8 ppb</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ocs_soil_4.8ppb:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; simulated monthly OCS uptake by soils at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 4.8 ppb</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ocs_veg_35.5ppb:&nbsp; simulated monthly OCS uptake by terrestrial vegetation at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 35.5 ppb</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ocs_soil_35.5ppb:&nbsp; simulated monthly OCS uptake by soils at an atmospheric OCS mole fraction of 35.5 ppb</p> <p>- - - - - - - - - - -</p> <p><strong>References:</strong></p> <p>Haynes, K. D., Baker, I. T., Denning, A. S., St&ouml;ckli, R., Schaefer, K., Lokupitiya, E. Y., and Haynes, J. M.: Representing<br> Grasslands Using Dynamic Prognostic Phenology Based on Biological Growth Stages: 1. Implementation in the Simple<br> Biosphere Model (SiB4), Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 4423-4439, 10.1029/2018ms001540, 2019.</p> <p>Quaglia, I., Visioni, D., Pitari, G., and Kravitz, B.: An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5757-5773, 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022, 2022.</p> <p>Sellers, P. J., Mintz, Y., Sud, Y. C., and Salcher, A.: A Simple Biosphere Model (SiB) for Use within General Circulation Models, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 43, 505-531, 1986.</p> <p>von Hobe, M., Br&uuml;hl, C., Lennartz, S. T., Whelan, M. E., and Kaushik, A.: Comment on &ldquo;An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide&rdquo; by Quaglia et al. (2022) ,</p>