Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Energetics of human locomotion near the walk-run transition speed.

<p><strong>Energetics of human locomotion near the walk-run transition speed.</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This dataset includes the raw metabolic and mechanical&nbsp;&nbsp;data&nbsp;of 28 young subjects during locomotion at variable speed, walking and running on a treadmill at different speeds and gaits.</p> <p>Characteristics of the experimental group:</p> <p>- Sex: 28 Males - Age: 32. 53 (10.99SD)- height: 175.0 cm (0.008 SD)- weight: 72.96 kg (9.51 SD)</p> <p>Equipment:</p> <p>- Cosmed K5 portable metabolic analyzer- Cosmed Omnia Software v.1.6.5</p> <p>-&nbsp;Vicon Nexus 2.14 (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd,&nbsp;Oxford,&nbsp;UK)</p> <p>Experimental Design: The walking stroke transition speed (W-R Ts) was determined experimentally. Each subject was asked to perform 3 trials on a treadmill (GE T2100, General Electric, USA), with an escalating speed ladder protocol. The ramp was designed to start with a comfortable ride (3.0 km h-1), and to increase speed by 0.5 km.h-1 every 15 s. When the subject began to run, the ramp stopped and the speed was marked on a worksheet. The mean or modal transition speed was taken as the T of the subject. All treadmill tests were performed at the Biomechanics and Motion Analysis Research Laboratory (LIBiAM) of the University of the Republic in Paysand&uacute; (Uruguay), at a controlled temperature of 25&ordm;C.</p> <p>The theoretical transition velocity tTs was calculated according to the Froude number equation (Alexander. 1976): v = (nFr g LL) 0.5, where v is the theoretical velocity, g is gravity, LL is the leg length, and nFr the Froude number, which was set to the constant value of 0.5,&nbsp;&nbsp;corresponding to the W-R transition (Alexander &amp; Jayes, 1983; Alejandro, 2003; Bona et al., 2019).</p> <p>Experimental speed ramp:</p> <p>-A custom ascending and descending speed ramp was designed, focused on the transition speed and varied from (Ts = Transition Speed) Ts-20% to Ts+20%, each step with a duration of 5 s. Each ramp cycle lasted 50 s, and was repeated 5 times, for a total test time of 250 s. The trial was repeated twice.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Mechanical Work (Mechanical cost of transport)</em></p> <p>The time course of the trajectory by&nbsp;<em>BcoM</em>&nbsp;was used to infer changes in the mechanical energies (potential and kinetics) involved. The horizontal work (<em>W<sub>h</sub></em>) was defined as the sum of the increments of the kinetic energy of the&nbsp;<em>BcoM</em>&nbsp;along the forward and mediolateral axes; the vertical work (<em>W<sub>v</sub></em>) was determined by the sum of the increments of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy along the vertical axis; the external work (<em>W</em><sub>ext</sub>&nbsp;), the mechanical work done to lift and accelerate the&nbsp;<em>BcoM</em>, was computed as the sum of the increments of the total mechanical energy of the&nbsp;<em>BcoM</em>&nbsp;(potential plus kinetic) (Cavagna et al., 1976; Willems et al., 1995). The internal work (<em>W</em><sub>int</sub>), the work necessary to accelerate the body segments with respects to the&nbsp;<em>BcoM</em>, was estimated with the methodology proposed by Cavagna &amp; Kaneko (1977).&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>W</em><sub>int</sub>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>W</em><sub>ext</sub>&nbsp;were summed to give the total mechanical work (<em>W<sub>tot</sub></em>) (Cavagna &amp; Kaneko, 1977; Willems et al., 1995).&nbsp;</p> <p>During locomotion cycles, especially in W, part of the potential energy of the&nbsp;<em>BcoM</em>&nbsp;is converted into kinetic energy, and vice versa, so that the sum of&nbsp;<em>W<sub>h</sub></em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>W<sub>v</sub></em>&nbsp;is greater than the actual work done (<em>W<sub>ext</sub></em>). The difference, expressed as percentage, corresponds to the energy recovery R% (Cavagna et al., 1976), which formula is:</p> <p>R% = (<em>W</em><sub>h</sub>&nbsp;+<em>&nbsp;Wv</em>&nbsp;-<em>&nbsp;W</em><sub>ext</sub>) (<em>W</em><sub>h</sub>&nbsp;+&nbsp;<em>Wv</em>)</p> <p><em>&nbsp;Cost of transport (Metabolic transport cost)</em></p> <p>Oxygen uptake and respiratory quotient were measured breath-by-breath by a portable metabolimeter (K5, Cosmed, Italy). Reference resting values were measured during 5 min in orthostatic quiet position. Each trial was started when the metabolic parameters were near the reference resting values.</p> <p>The&nbsp;<sub>2</sub>&nbsp;(mlO<sub>2</sub>.kg<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>) and RQ of the last 50 s of each recorded trial, corresponding to the last complete ramp, were averaged. The reference resting&nbsp;<sub>2</sub>&nbsp;was subtracted to the measured one to obtain the net oxygen uptake. VO<sub>2NET</sub>&nbsp;was then converted to mass-specific metabolic rate (W kg<sup>-1</sup>) using a RQ based energetic equivalent(P. E. Di Prampero et&nbsp;al., 2015). The C (J kg<sup>-1</sup>&nbsp;m<sup>-1</sup>) was finally obtained by dividing the metabolic rate for the average speed:&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(2)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Apparent Mechanical Efficiency (AE)</em></p> <p>The AE was calculated as proposed by Cavagna and Kaneko, ie,</p> <p>AE =&nbsp;<em>W</em><sub>to</sub>&nbsp;C</p> <p>where&nbsp;<em>W</em><sub>tot</sub>&nbsp;is the total mechanical work and C the cost of transport (G. A. Cavagna &amp; Kaneko, 1977).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Data processing and calculation</em></p> <p>Image preprocessing was performed in Vicon Nexus 2.14 (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd,&nbsp;Oxford,&nbsp;UK), kinematic variable calculation performed with Python 2.7 and ProCalc&nbsp;1.6 (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd, Oxford, UK), the calculation of&nbsp;mechanical&nbsp;variables was implemented in&nbsp;MatLab&nbsp;&nbsp;(The MathWorks, Inc., California, USA). The calculation of C was performed in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 365).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Note: Not all subjects performed the entire protocol. In particular, some data lack follow-up.</p> <p>Analysis of the cost of transportation:</p> <p>All participants signed an informed consent. The protocol was approved by the University&#39;s Ethics Committee (#311170-000921-19).<br> &nbsp;</p> <p>The legend of the dataset.</p> <p>There are 3 excel&nbsp;sheets&nbsp;&nbsp;where each row is associated with subjects from 1 to 28.</p> <p>Energy&nbsp;sheet:</p> <p>Subject: Subject</p> <p>Age</p> <p>Weigth</p> <p>Heigth(m)</p> <p>IMC</p> <p>Km x week: kilometers per week</p> <p>Background: history of injuries</p> <p>INT1 km/h: attempt 1</p> <p>INT2 km/h: attempt 2</p> <p>INT3 km/h: Attempt 3</p> <p>Average transition (km/h): average walk-race transition speed</p> <p>Froude estimated PST(m/s)</p> <p>Froude Estimated PST(km/h)</p> <p>Basal Vo2: Basal oxygen consumption&nbsp;&nbsp;in orthostasis</p> <p>VO2/kg/min: Oxygen consumption in the test</p> <p>RQ: RQ in the test</p> <p>VO2 Net VO2kg/min): VO2 net in the test</p> <p>VO2/kg/s</p> <p>J/kg/s = W/kg</p> <p>C (J/kg/m): transport cost obtained in the test</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Test: test performed</p> <p>Gait: type of gait that has been evaluated</p> <p>ASC/DESC: place on the ramp (ascending or descending)</p> <p>Stride: stride identification&nbsp;&nbsp;for each type of gait</p> <p>Duty Factor_tr: duty factor</p> <p>Stride Frequency_tr: stride frequency</p> <p>Stride Time_tr: stride time</p> <p>Time: time in the stride</p> <p>Speed in treadmill : speed that occurs in treadmill</p> <p>Distance: distance traveled by the stride</p> <p>Step frequency: frequency of passage</p> <p>Wext: External Work</p> <p>Rec: recovery</p> <p>Wv: trabajo vertical</p> <p>Wh: horizontal work</p> <p>WintTOT: Total internal work</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
4
Harmonization
8
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
0