Skip to main content
zenodoopen

FEDORA. Corpus of literature review on limits and potential of the current organization of knowledge in disciplines

<p>Coded segments for literature review in FEDORA project (Grant Agreement no. 872841), WP1 tasks T1.1, T1.3, T1.6, T1.7. Manually coded segments by 4 coders that were extracted from MAXQDA file are based on the following topics:</p> <p>1. Potential and limits of the vertical disciplinary organization<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.1. What skills are formed?<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.2. What new skills are needed?<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.3. Diversity-responsiveness of the current organization<br> 2. Suggestions to improve (all types of suggestions)<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.1. Other forms of knowledge organization<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.1.1. What thinking skills are they fostering?<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.1.1.1. Are they fostering skills that are needed to citizens and professionals to participate in inter-multi-transdisciplinary, multi-actor and open contexts of RI?<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.1.1.2. What are these skills?<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.1.2.&nbsp; What barriers in implementation of suggestions to improve/other forms of knowledge organisation do stakeholders perceive and anticipate?<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.1.3.&nbsp; How can the universities and schools be supported in order to break down the barriers?<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.2. Forms of co-teaching and open-schooling<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.2.1. Are they effective?<br> 3. The ways the young perceive, experience and cope with science and technology, their future and the range of motives<br> 4. Criteria for designing and/or revising teaching materials and activities for 11-19 year old students<br> 5. Examples of inter-multi-transdisciplinary teaching materials<br> 6. Examples of multi-actor co-teaching and open-schooling contexts<br> 7. Operational markers aimed to evaluate the impact of the inter-multi-transdisciplinary materials on students&rsquo; perception and engagement</p> <p>To note, only citations for code groups 1 - 2.1 are presented in this document.</p>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
8
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
8

Topics