Benchmarking microbial profilers on the CAMI data
<p>Results in the CAMI format of testing various tools and reference databases.</p> <p>Profilers used:<br> * mOTUs 3.0.3 (https://github.com/motu-tool/mOTUs)<br> * MetaPhlAn 4.0.3 (https://github.com/biobakery/MetaPhlAn)<br> * Bracken 2.8 (https://github.com/jenniferlu717/Bracken)<br> * KMA 1.4.7 (https://bitbucket.org/genomicepidemiology/kma)</p> <p>For KMA, these different reference databases have been evaluated:<br> * Silva (20200116)<br> * Genomic (20220524)<br> * mOTUs db (20221205)</p> <p>See https://github.com/genomicepidemiology/ava-tax-benchmark for details.</p>
ShareScore
32/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0
Dataset details
- Repository
- zenodo
- Published
- May 10, 2023
- License
- cc-by-4.0
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.7923774
Scored with release 0.9.0
ScienceDex for faculty
Your academic CV and NIH biosketch
Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.