Skip to main content
dryadopen

Pollinator sharing and hybridization in a pair of dioecious figs sheds light on the pathways to speciation

<p>The dynamics and processes underlying the co-diversification of plant–pollinator interactions are of great interest to researchers of biodiversity and evolution. Co-speciation is generally considered to be a key process in generating the diversity of figs and their pollinating wasps. Groups of closely-related figs pollinated by separate wasps occur frequently and represent excellent opportunities to study ongoing diversification in this textbook mutualism. We study two closely-related sympatric dioecious figs (<em>F. heterostyla</em> and <em>F. squamosa</em>) in Xishuangbanna, southwest China, and aim to document what is likely to be the final stages of speciation between these species using a combination of trait data and experimental manipulation. Thirty-seven and 29 floral volatile compounds were identified from receptive <em>F. heterostyla </em>and<em> F. squamosa</em> figs respectively, with 25 compounds shared by both species. Interspecific variation in chemical dissimilarity was significant but relatively low. Ovipositor lengths lie well within the range required for access to heterospecific ovules, facilitating hybridization. Cross-introduction of wasps into figs was conducted and hybrid seeds were generated for all donor/recipient combinations. Wasps of <em>F. heterostyla </em>produce adult offspring in <em>F. squamosa</em> figs, while wasps of <em>F. squamosa</em> induce gall development in <em>F. heterostyla</em> figs and their offspring fail to mature in synchrony with their novel host. We record limited geographic barriers, limited volatile dissimilarity, compatible morphology, complementary reproductive phenologies and the production of hybrid seeds and wasp offspring. We hypothesize that this incomplete wasp specialization and incomplete reproductive isolation may generalize to other closely-related figs.</p>

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
0
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
8