FIGURE 3 in Relative Genetic Homogeneity within a Phenotypically Diverse group: The Case of Lake Tana Labeobarbus (Cyprinidae) Species Flock, Ethiopia

FIGURE 3. Scatter plot from Discriminant analysis of Principal Components (DPC; Jombart et al. 2010) of microsatellite data from 161 Lake Tana Labeobarbus individuals. The 95% confidence ellipses of each group based on the common covariance matrix assumption for the multivariate normal distribution are presented. Points represent individual genotypes and symbols represent species (A) or spawning populations (B). A. Using species as grouping factor with asterisks representing the estimated means for each population: Pop A = L. acutirostris, Pop B = L. brevicephalus, Pop C = L. crassibarbus, Pop D = L. gorgorensis, Pop E = L. gorguari, Pop F = L. intermedius, Pop G = L. longissimus, Pop H = L. macrophtalmus, Pop I = L. megastoma, Pop J = L. nedgia, Pop K = L. platydorsus, Pop L = L. surkis, Pop M = L. tsanensis, Pop N = L. truttiformis. B. Using spawning strategy as grouping criteria: ▲riverine spawning population, ●lacustrine spawning population.