Skip to main content
dryadopen

Data from: Classifying interactions in a synthetic bacterial community is hindered by inhibitory growth medium

<p>Predicting the fate of a microbial community and its member species relies on understanding the nature of their interactions. However, designing simple assays that distinguish between interaction types can be challenging. Here, we performed spent media assays based on the predictions of a mathematical model to decipher the interactions between four bacterial species: <em>Agrobacterium</em> <em>tumefaciens</em> (<em>At</em>), <em>Comamonas</em> <em>testosteroni</em> (<em>Ct</em>), <em>Microbacterium</em> <em>saperdae</em> (<em>Ms</em>) and <em>Ochrobactrum</em> <em>anthropi</em> (<em>Oa</em>). While most experimental results matched model predictions, the behavior of <em>Ct</em> did not: its lag phase was reduced in the pure spent media of <em>At</em> and <em>Ms</em>, but prolonged again when we replenished with our growth medium. Further experiments showed that the growth medium actually delayed the growth of <em>Ct</em>, leading us to suspect that <em>At</em> and <em>Ms</em> could alleviate this inhibitory effect. There was, however, no evidence supporting such "cross-detoxification" and instead, we identified metabolites secreted by <em>At</em> and <em>Ms</em> that were then consumed or "cross-fed" by <em>Ct</em>, shortening its lag phase. Our results highlight that even simple, defined growth media can have inhibitory effects on some species and that such negative effects need to be included in our models. Based on this, we present new guidelines to correctly distinguish between different interaction types, such as cross-detoxification and cross-feeding.</p>

ShareScore

32/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
0
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
8