zenodoopen
Validating NISAR's cropland mapping approach and the USDA/NASS Cropland Data Layer against ground truth data in a fragmented urban agricultural region
<p>Field data used in manuscript:</p> <p>1 shapefile containing the ROI outline for which Sentinel-1 data was cropped</p> <p>1 shapefile containing the 93 fields investigated with their names, types and sizes as attributes </p> <p>8 annual csv data for active fields, consisting of 3 harvest dates and 5 planting dates. This list is after translating data from Farmlogic Report (not conducive to analysis in the format) and filtering for fields greater 1 acre. The study lateron further screened to use only fields greater than 2 acreas (0.81 hectares). </p> <p> </p>
ShareScore
36/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 4
- Access
- 16
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 4