Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Wilmington River Estuary, Georgia, USA
<p><strong>Title: </strong>Current velocity data from a continuous survey using a towed ADCP in Wilmington River Estuary, Georgia, USA</p> <p><strong>Author/Data Collector: </strong>Chunyan Li</p> <p><strong>Point of Contact, PI, Originator: </strong>Chunyan Li (cli@lsu.edu)</p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>These are velocity profile data from vessel towed ADCP obtained in the Wilmington River Estuary during a survey conducted on Sep. 29, 2004, for ~ 11.5 hours. The instrument was an RDI 600 KHz Workhorse ADCP.</p> <p>The ADCP was mounted on a sled towed by the boat. The vertical bins were 0.5 m. The surveys were conducted at an average cruise speed of about 2.5–3 m/s except at the turns when the vessel had to slow down and during CTD casts when the vessel had to stop for a few minutes. A Seabird Electronic SBE 19 plus CTD was used to measure the vertical profiles of water temperature, salinity, fluorescence, light attenuation, and dissolved oxygen during the survey. Note that only ADCP data are included in this dataset.</p> <p>The data are averaged at about 30-second intervals, excluding bad data. The data presented here are in ASCII with the generic format provided by the RDI’s software WinRiver II output. There are a total of two data files. There are:</p> <p>ADCP_Sep29_2004_WM_000_ASC.TXT</p> <p>ADCP_Sep29_2004_WM_001_ASC.TXT</p> <p>Here is an example of the data –</p> <p> 50 50 42 50 1 20 1</p> <p>4 9 29 11 32 26 57 468 60 2.361 -0.824 118.753 24.276</p> <p>49.04 93.15 -0.17 -0.46 0.00 6.00 0.00 3.08 6.63 6.64 6.68 6.59</p> <p>30.53 28.91 26.93 14.22 30.45</p> <p>32.00327167 -81.01664167 31.50 92.41 30.4</p> <p>-22.0 -7.2 -3.2 -11.2 10.0 -10.8 10.0 1.53 5.53</p> <p>50 cm BT dB 0.43 0.073</p> <p> 1.53 52.35 193.13 -11.9 -51.0 -0.3 3.5 92.1 94.8 94.6 95.6 100 -2.02</p> <p> 2.03 49.89 189.47 -8.2 -49.2 -0.1 -2.1 97.7 99.9 100.4 100.4 100 -2.28</p> <p> 2.53 52.68 187.22 -6.6 -52.3 0.7 4.0 99.0 101.3 101.7 101.2 98 -2.84</p> <p> 3.03 48.92 190.92 -9.3 -48.0 -0.2 5.1 99.2 101.3 101.9 101.6 100 -2.21</p> <p> 3.53 51.77 185.37 -4.8 -51.5 0.3 5.7 98.6 101.4 102.0 101.2 100 -2.99</p> <p> 4.03 48.03 186.14 -5.1 -47.8 1.0 1.2 98.5 101.1 101.9 101.0 100 -2.64</p> <p> 4.53 50.69 190.02 -8.8 -49.9 0.5 3.6 98.5 101.2 101.9 101.2 100 -2.32</p> <p> 5.03 43.70 186.57 -5.0 -43.4 0.7 4.4 98.3 101.2 101.9 101.2 100 -2.34</p> <p> 5.53 41.22 186.13 -4.4 -41.0 1.5 -0.3 98.5 101.6 102.0 101.4 83 -2.35</p> <p> 6.03 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 -32768 255 255 255 255 0 2147483647</p> <p>The ADCP data were used in Li et al. (2008).</p> <p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></p> <p>I would like to thank Captain Harry Carter who assisted me by driving the boat for the whole day. He also assisted me with CTD casts, deployment, and retrieval of other CTDs. It was a great day working out with him.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Li, C., C. Chen, D. Guadagnoli, and I. Y. Georgiou (2008). Geometry-induced residual eddies in estuaries with curved channels: Observations and modeling studies, <em>Journal of Geophysical Research</em>, Vol. 113, C01005, doi:10.1029/2006JC004031.</p> <p> </p>
ShareScore
40/100
Overall dataset sharing score
Score breakdown
These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.
- Stewardship
- 4
- Harmonization
- 8
- Access
- 20
- Reuse readiness
- 8
- Engagement
- 0