Fig. 2 in To design, or not to design? Comparison of beetle ultraconserved element probe set utility based on phylogenetic distance, breadth, and method of probe

Fig. 2. Schematical overview of the workflow for the present study.Workflow proceeds from left to right and top to bottom.The tablets correspond to the three broader segments of the study: genomic resource generation, probe design, and in silico testing; within tablet boundaries can be found associated taxon sets, data, experimentation, and results. Arrows indicate the flow of data, associated results, and the location results can ultimately be found. Color corresponds to membership within a taxon set or probe set.The red boxes around Hydro 2.7kv1 and Scarab 3kv1 denote final optimized, tailored probe set design tailored for Hydrophiloidea and Scarabaeidae based on the results of this study. Length of 75CM box corresponds to alignment length. Abbreviations used: NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; 75CM, 75% complete matrix; AMAS, alignment manipulation and summary statistics (Borowiec 2016); R-F, Robinson– Foulds distance (Robinson and Foulds 1981).