Skip to main content
dryadopen

Microsatellite genotypes of Japanese abies species: Insights from population genetics and SDM

<p><span>Range shifts during the Pleistocene shaped the unique phylogeographical structures of many species. Pleistocene range shifts gave currently allopatric species opportunities to occur in sympatry, likely resulting in ancient introgressions between related taxa. In our study, we investigate the range shifts and introgression patterns of three Japanese <em>Abies </em>species (<em>A. firma, A. homolepis, and A. veitchii</em>) by employing an extensive survey of 43 populations. This survey includes comprehensive analysis of both mitochondrial (mtDNA) and nuclear (18 microsatellites) genomes, in combination with species distribution modeling (SDM). It is important to note that these two types of markers provide distinct and complementary information, as they have different modes of inheritance and mutation rates. Bayesian clustering analysis indicates that the three species were clearly separated, with the exception of the <em>A. homolepis </em>var. <em>umbellata</em> population, which is considered a natural hybrid between <em>A. homolepis</em> and <em>A. firma</em>. However, mtDNA haplotypes of the four northern populations of <em>A. firma</em> were entirely replaced by two major haplotypes of <em>A. homolepis </em>and <em>A. veitchii.</em> The results of Neighbor-net, NewHybrids, STRUCTURE analyses, and SDM suggest that historical introgression between species occurred in each geographic region, with mtDNA capture being the likely mechanism. However, contrary to these findings, the ABC coalescent analysis did not support an ancient introgression. Therefore, further validation with genome-wide level data is needed to clarify this issue. Our conclusion is that climate-induced range shifts during the Pleistocene/Holocene likely played a crucial role in the observed patterns of introgression in these species.</span></p>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
4
Harmonization
12
Access
12
Reuse readiness
0
Engagement
8

Topics