Skip to main content
zenodoopen

Dataset for "Benchmarking for the automated detection of southern yellow-cheeked crested gibbon calls from passive acoustic monitoring data"

<p>"<span>Benchmarking automated detection and classification approaches for long-term acoustic monitoring of endangered species: a case study on gibbons from Cambodia</span>"</p> <div> <p><span>Recent advances in deep learning and transfer learning have revolutionized our ability for the automated detection of acoustic signals from long-term soundscape recordings. Here, we provide a benchmark for the automated detection of southern yellow-cheeked crested gibbon (<em>Nomascus gabriellae</em>) calls recorded in Jahoo, Cambodia. For the benchmarking, we compared the performance of support vector machines (SVMs), a quasi-DenseNet architecture (Koogu), transfer learning with ResNet50 models trained on the &lsquo;ImageNet&rsquo; dataset (ResNet), and transfer learning with embeddings from a global birdsong model (BirdNET). We also investigated the impact of varying the number of training samples on the performance of these models. Transfer learning models based on <span>BirdNET embeddings had superior performance with a smaller number of training samples, whereas Koogu and ResNet models only had acceptable performance with a larger number of training samples (&gt;200 gibbon samples). We deployed the BirdNET-based model over </span>&gt; 130,000 hours<span> of continuous soundscape data, which, after manual review, resulted in &gt;12,000 verified true positive detections. We found that gibbon calling events occurred mostly in the early morning hours between 05:00 to 0:600 local time. We had fewer gibbon detections during the monsoon period and found substantial variation in spatial patterns of calling events across months and years. </span>We show that automated detection can be used to investigate long-term spatial and temporal patterns of gibbon calling events. Reliable automated detection approaches are a critical first step for using passive acoustic monitoring to assess endangered gibbon populations at ecologically relevant temporal- and spatial-scales. </span></p> <p>&nbsp;Detailed instructions regarding use are provided on GitHub.</p> </div> <p>Link to GitHub: https://github.com/DenaJGibbon/benchmark-gibbon-calls.</p> <p>Please cite both if you use these data:&nbsp;</p> <p>Clink, D., Cross-Jaya, H., Kim, J., Ahmad, A. H., Hong, M., Sala, R., Birot, H., Agger, C., Vu, T. T., Thi, H. N., Chi, T. N., &amp; Klinck, H. (2024). Dataset for "Benchmarking for the automated detection of southern yellow-cheeked crested gibbon calls from passive acoustic monitoring data" [Data set]. Zenodo.&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12706803" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12706803</a></p> <p>Clink DJ, Cross-Jaya H, Kim J, Ahmad AH, Hong M, Sala R, Birot H, Agger C, Vu TT, Thi HN, Chi TN. Benchmarking for the automated detection and classification of southern yellow-cheeked crested gibbon calls from passive acoustic monitoring data. bioRxiv. 2024:2024-08.</p>

ShareScore

36/100

Overall dataset sharing score

Score breakdown

These five areas show where the dataset supports — or may limit — practical reuse.

Stewardship
4
Harmonization
4
Access
16
Reuse readiness
8
Engagement
4