Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

213

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

213 results for “Geometric morphometric analysis”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 3 Superimposed forewing shapes of male and females of P. machinosus, P. securicola, and P. repens.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Gushki RS, Lashkari M, Mirzaei S (2018) Identification, sexual dimorphism, and allometric effects of three psyllid species of the genus Psyllopsis by geometric morphometric analysis (Hemiptera, Liviidae). ZooKeys 737: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.11560

Figure 1 Position of landmarks (circles) in the right forewing of Psyllopsis machinosus. Position of landmarks follows that of Lashkari et al. (2013).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

: Data type: morphometric data

opencc-zeroApr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 7 Differences in elytron shape among each branch and ancestor, on the basis of principal component analysis. Empty dots indicate the number of the node on the phylogenetic tree; solid dots indicate the average shape of the extant subfamily/tribe of each branch.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 6 Differences in pronotum shape among each branch and ancestor, on the basis of principal component analysis. Empty dots indicate the number of the node on the phylogenetic tree; solid dots indicate the average shape of the extant subfamily/tribe of each branch.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 5 Reconstruction of ancestral groundplans of the elytron in Lucanidae and the outgroups. The splines indicate the deformation of the shapes relative to the reference configuration. The phylogenetic tree was summarized and reconstructed from earlier molecular results (Kim and Farrell 2015).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 3 Differences in elytron shape between outgroups and Lucanidae, on the basis of principal component analysis at the species level. The four circles are 90%-equal frequency ellipses of Lucanidae subfamilies.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 4 Reconstruction of ancestral groundplans of the pronotum in Lucanidae and the outgroups. The splines indicate deformation of the shapes relative to the reference configuration. The phylogenetic tree was summarized and reconstructed from earlier molecular results (Kim and Farrell 2015).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 2 Differences in pronotum shape between outgroups and Lucanidae, on the basis of principal component analysis at the species level. The four circles are 90%-equal frequency ellipses of Lucanidae subfamilies.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.833.26164

Figure 1 Description of the curves used in geometric morphometric analysis. The positions selected for the pronotum and elytron curves are represented by Prosopocoilus sp. in dorsal view. The curves were resampled in 25 or 50 semi-landmarks (SLM).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Fig. 3 in Differentiation of Trichuris species eggs from non-human primates by geometric morphometric analysis

Fig. 3. Factor map corresponding to Trichuris sp. eggs derived from different host primate species: macaque (M. sylvanus), colobus (C. g. kikuyensis), grivets (C. aethiops) and the Brazza's monkey (C. neglectus) from zoos in Spain. Samples are projected onto the first (PC1, 61%) and second (PC2, 18%) principal components. Each group is represented by its perimeter. Circles represent the centroid in each community.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Studying developmental variation with Geometric Morphometric Image Analysis (GMIA)

The ways in which embryo development can vary across individuals of a population determine how genetic variation translates into adult phenotypic variation. The study of developmental variation has been hampered by the lack of quantitative methods for the joint analysis of embryo shape and the spatial distribution of cellular activity within the developing embryo geometry. By drawing from the strength of geometric morphometrics and pixel/voxel-based image analysis, we present a new approach for the biometric analysis of two-dimensional and three-dimensional embryonic images. Well-differentiated structures are described in terms of their shape, whereas structures with diffuse boundaries, such as emerging cell condensations or molecular gradients, are described as spatial patterns of intensities. We applied this approach to microscopic images of the tail fins of larval and juvenile rainbow trout. Inter-individual variation of shape and cell density was found highly spatially structured across the tail fin and temporally dynamic throughout the investigated period.

opencc-zeroDec 2013View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 in Taxonomic revision of the Hydroporus bodemeyeri species complex (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) with a geometric morphometric analysis of body shape within the group

Figure 5. Cluster analysis of average body shapes of examined taxa (Euclidean distance, UPGMA).

opennotspecifiedJun 2010View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 in Taxonomic revision of the Hydroporus bodemeyeri species complex (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) with a geometric morphometric analysis of body shape within the group

Figure 6. Distribution of the species of the H. bodemeyeri species complex.

opennotspecifiedJun 2010View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)

Figure 3. Shape differentiation of the mandible on the first two axes of the PCA on mean species centroid coordinates. Outlines are reconstructed on the first two principal components; light grey outline represents the maximum values of the axes, dark grey outline corresponds to extreme reconstruction. Solid symbols indicate families with hystricomorphous skull: squares, Anomaluridae; rhombi, Ctenodactylidae; circles, Pedetidae; triangles, Dipodidae; stars, Graphiurinae. Open symbols indicate myomorph families: stars, Gliridae (Glirinae/Leithiinae); rhombi, Nesomyidae; circles, Muridae; triangles, Cricetidae. Upper left, mean projection for each family, with the minimum spanning tree.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 in Evolution of the zygomasseteric construction in Rodentia, as revealed by a geometric morphometric analysis of the mandible of Graphiurus (Rodentia, Gliridae)

Figure 5. Mapping of the four infraorbital structures on a phylogenetic tree derived from Huchon et al. (2002) and Adkins et al. (2003). Boxes: dashed, protrogomorphous condition; white, sciuromorphous condition; light grey, hystricomorphous condition; dark grey, myomorphous condition. Abbreviations: iof, infraorbital foramen; zp, zygomatic plate.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191

Figure 2 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the genera of Lycocerus, Prothemus and Themus. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (74.39% of total variation) and PC2 (8.52% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each genus is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191

Figure 5 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Themus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (32.87% of total variation) and PC2 (16.48% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191

Figure 4 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Prothemus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (38.40% of total variation) and PC2 (15.88% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191

Figure 3 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Lycocerus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (49.02% of total variation) and PC2 (14.92% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.

opencc-by-4.0May 2015View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record