Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
884
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
884 results for “Israel”
Figure 3 in Epiblema minutana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in Israel: Promise or Peril?
Figure 3. Ecological host range of Epiblema minutana within the geographical distribution in 2019.
Figure 1 in Epiblema minutana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in Israel: Promise or Peril?
Figure 1. Spread and estimated geographical distribution of Epiblema minutana in Israel.
Fig. 1 in Earthworms From Israel. Ii. Remarks On The Genus Perelia Easton, 1983 With Descriptions Of A New Genus And Two New Species
Fig. 1. Nephridial bladder of P. arnoldiana (PEREL, 1971)
Fig. 4 in Earthworms From Israel. Ii. Remarks On The Genus Perelia Easton, 1983 With Descriptions Of A New Genus And Two New Species
Fig. 4. Distribution of P. galileana sp. n. and P. shamsi sp. n.
Figs 2–3. P in Earthworms From Israel. Ii. Remarks On The Genus Perelia Easton, 1983 With Descriptions Of A New Genus And Two New Species
Figs 2–3. P. kaznakovi (MICHAELSEN, 1910): 2 = nephridial bladder (top), 3 = musculature (bottom)
volatile organic compounds that were measred at the Dead Sea - Israel (both terrestrial and coastal; Anthropogenic and biogenic)
<p>Multiple VOCs (biogenic and anthropogenic) were sampled by our research group at various terrestrial and coastal sites around the Dead Sea (Israel). Analysis was conducted by Prof. Donald Blake, and the data were included in a publication available at <a href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7667/2019/" target="_new" rel="noreferrer">https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/7667/2019/</a>.</p>
Table 2 in Changes in a soil microarthropod community in the vicinity of dominant tree species under trampling management at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel
<p><b>Table 2</b> Mean values (± SD) of soil physical and chemical parameters at different treatment sites at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel, December 2013. SM = soil moisture, OM = organic matter, pH = soil pH, SEC = soil electrical conductivity, SD = soil density, WHC = water-holding capacity. OE = open places under enclosure conditions, OT = open places under trampling conditions; EE <i>E.</i> = <i>camaldulensis</i> canopy habitat under enclosure conditions, ET = <i>E</i>. <i>camaldulensis</i> canopy habitat under trampling conditions, TE <i>T</i> =. <i>aphylla</i> canopy habitat under enclosure conditions, TT = <i>T. aphylla</i> canopy habitat under trampling conditions, CE = <i>C</i>. <i>sempervirens</i> canopy habitat under enclosure conditions, CT = <i>C. sempervirens</i> canopy habitat under trampling conditions. Different letters in the same column represent significant difference <i>p</i> at <0.05.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>SM (%)</th><th>OM (%)</th><th>pH</th><th>SEC (µ -1) cm</th><th>SD (g -3) cm</th><th>WHC (%)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>OE</th><td>25.6±3.4a</td><td>1.1±0.2b</td><td>7.5±0.2b</td><td>87.6±17.5d</td><td>1.1±0.0b</td><td>53.6±0.9ab</td></tr><tr><th>OT</th><td>7.8±1.7c</td><td>0.2±0.0e</td><td>7.6±0.0b</td><td>150.3±51.3c</td><td>1.6±0.0a</td><td>25.6±1.0c</td></tr><tr><th>EE</th><td>16.6±1.6b</td><td>1.3±0.2b</td><td>7.6±0.0b</td><td>130.2±9.4cd</td><td>1.0±0.1c</td><td>52.6±11.1ab</td></tr><tr><th>ET</th><td>23.2±3.8a</td><td>2.0±0.3a</td><td>7.6±0.0b</td><td>255.3±39.6ab</td><td>1.1±0.0bc</td><td>31.9±3.5c</td></tr><tr><th>TE</th><td>21.9±4.4ab</td><td>0.4±0.1d</td><td>7.9±0.0a</td><td>152.0±17.8c</td><td>1.0±0.1c</td><td>52.1±14.6ab</td></tr><tr><th>TT</th><td>14.1±5.2b</td><td>1.1±0.1b</td><td>7.6±0.1b</td><td>254.1±48.0ab</td><td>1.0±0.1c</td><td>43.3±6.2b</td></tr><tr><th>CE</th><td>26.9±3.4a</td><td>0.8±0.3c</td><td>7.6±0.1b</td><td>209.9±22.5b</td><td>1.0±0.1c</td><td>56.3±5.8a</td></tr><tr><th>CT</th><td>22.0±6.0ab</td><td>0.5±0.2d</td><td>7.8±0.1a</td><td>275.9±21.9a</td><td>1.0±0.0c</td><td>43.0±3.9b</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3 in Changes in a soil microarthropod community in the vicinity of dominant tree species under trampling management at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel
<p><b>Table 3</b> Effects of sampling habitat (“Habitat”), trampling management (“Trampling”), and their interaction on soil parameters, abundance of soil microarthropods, and diversity indices of soil Acari at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel, December 2013 (General linear model, α = 0.05). * <i>p</i> <0.05, ** <i>p</i> <0.01, *** <i>p</i> <0.001.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Microarthropods</b></th><th><i>d</i> <i>f</i></th><th><i>F</i></th><th><b>Soil parameters</b></th><th><i>d</i> <i>f</i></th><th><i>F</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Total microarthropod abundance</b></th><td></td><td></td><td><b>Soil moisture</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>15.85***</td><td>Model</td><td>8</td><td>109.38***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>39.13***</td><td>Trampling</td><td>1</td><td>18.46***</td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>1.65</td><td>Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>5.90**</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>4.89**</td><td>Trampling * Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>12.84***</td></tr><tr><th><b>Collembola abundance</b></th><td></td><td></td><td><b>Organic matter</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>4.90**</td><td>Model</td><td>8</td><td>116.32***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>11.18**</td><td>Trampling</td><td>1</td><td>0.05</td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>2.29</td><td>Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>48.99***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>2.56</td><td>Trampling * Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>32.99***</td></tr><tr><th><b>Other arthropod abundance</b></th><td></td><td></td><td><b>Soil pH</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>1</td><td>Model</td><td>8</td><td>35120.21***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>1.8</td><td>Trampling</td><td>1</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>0.73</td><td>Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>4.69*</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>0.73</td><td>Trampling * Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>13.93***</td></tr><tr><th><b>Soil Acari abundance</b></th><td></td><td></td><td><b>Electrical conductivity</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>18.85***</td><td>Model</td><td>8</td><td>156.31***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>43.09***</td><td>Trampling</td><td>1</td><td>61.80***</td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>0.88</td><td>Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>20.89***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>3.60*</td><td>Trampling * Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>1.76</td></tr><tr><th><b>Taxon richness of soil Acari</b></th><td></td><td></td><td><b>Soil density</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>16.11***</td><td>Model</td><td>8</td><td>1769.86***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>34.68***</td><td>Trampling</td><td>1</td><td>57.12***</td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>3.17*</td><td>Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>82.99***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>1.23</td><td>Trampling * Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>36.99***</td></tr><tr><th><b>Shannon index of soil Acari</b></th><td></td><td></td><td><b>Water-holding capacity</b></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>18.88***</td><td>Model</td><td>8</td><td>155.49***</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>51.07***</td><td>Trampling</td><td>1</td><td>45.98***</td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>4.03*</td><td>Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>3.22*</td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>0.78</td><td>Trampling * Habitat</td><td>3</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><th><b>Simpson index of soil Acari</b></th></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>13.42***</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>7.47**</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>5.22**</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><b>Evenness index of soil Acari</b></th></tr><tr><th>Model</th><td>8</td><td>42.11***</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Trampling</th><td>1</td><td>120.61***</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>3.68*</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Trampling * Habitat</th><td>3</td><td>1.82</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Changes in a soil microarthropod community in the vicinity of dominant tree species under trampling management at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel
<p><b>Table 1</b> Sampling design (replication = 4) for sites at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel, December 2013. Herbaceous ground cover: +++ patchy; + a few plants, – no plants. OE = open places under enclosure conditions, OT = open places under trampling conditions; EE <i>E</i> =. <i>camaldulensis</i> canopy habitat under enclosure conditions, ET = <i>E. camaldulensis</i> canopy habitat under trampling conditions, TE <i>T</i> =. aphylla canopy habitat under enclosure conditions, TT <i>T</i> =. <i>aphylla</i> canopy habitat under trampling conditions, CE = <i>C</i>. <i>sempervirens</i> canopy habitat under enclosure conditions, CT = <i>C</i>. <i>sempervirens</i> canopy habitat under trampling conditions.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Habitat</th><th>Code</th><th>Treatment</th><th>Tree height (m)</th><th>Tree canopy crown (m2)</th><th>Herbaceous vegetation</th><th>Soil physical/biological top layer</th><th>Litter layer (cm)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Open spaces</th><td>OT OE</td><td>Trampling Enclosure</td><td>- -</td><td>- -</td><td>No +++</td><td>No Physical top layer</td><td>No No</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. camaldulensis</i></th><td>ET EE</td><td>Trampling Enclosure</td><td>10-13</td><td>6×8</td><td>No +</td><td>No Biological top layer</td><td>No 2-3</td></tr><tr><th><i>T. aphylla</i></th><td>TT TE</td><td>Trampling Enclosure</td><td>14-16</td><td>8×8</td><td>No +++</td><td>No Physical top layer</td><td>No Few</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. sempervirens</i></th><td>CT CE</td><td>Trampling Enclosure</td><td>14-16</td><td>7×9</td><td>No +</td><td>No Biological layer</td><td>No 1-2</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 2 in Molecular characterization of the re-emerging West Nile virus in avian species and equids in Israel, 2018, and pathological description of the disease
<p><b>Table 2</b> Pathological findings and calculated viral genome copies of WNV-positive avian species</p><table><thead><tr><th>Bird no.</th><th>Species</th><th>Common name</th><th>Sequencing</th><th>Isolation</th><th>Tissues tested and calculated target copies per reaction</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>AV148</th><td><i>Larus michahellis</i></td><td>Yellow legged seagull</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Cloacal swab: 5.8×10 6; brain: 2.8×10 6; kidney: 1.2×10 7</td></tr><tr><th>AV152</th><td><i>Anser anser</i></td><td>Domesticated goose</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Cloacal swab:9.7×10 5; brain 3.3× 10 5; kidney: 4700; eye swab: 1.3× 10 6</td></tr><tr><th>AV153</th><td><i>Anser anser</i></td><td>Domesticated goose</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Cloacal swab: 6.8×10 5; brain: 1.2×10 7; viscera: 6.8× 10 5</td></tr><tr><th>AV156</th><td><i>Asio otus</i></td><td>Long eared owl</td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td><td>Cloacal swab: 6.8×10 5; brain: 2.6×10 4; viscera: 4.9× 10 7</td></tr><tr><th>AV157</th><td><i>Asio otus</i></td><td>Long eared owl</td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td><td>Cloacal swab: 6.8×10 5; brain: 5800; kidney: 360; eye swab: 50</td></tr><tr><th>AV169</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i></td><td>Hooded crow</td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td><td>Cloacal swab: 4700; blood: 1100</td></tr><tr><th>AV178</th><td><i>Phasianus colchicus</i></td><td>Common pheasant</td><td>No</td><td>No</td><td>Brain: 4700</td></tr><tr><th>1459</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i></td><td>Hooded crow</td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td><td>Cloacal swab: 2300</td></tr><tr><th>1505</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i></td><td>Hooded crow</td><td>Yes</td><td>No</td><td>Brain: 4700</td></tr><tr><th>1514</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i></td><td>Hooded crow</td><td>Yes</td><td>Yes</td><td>Brain: 9.9× 10 7</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Molecular characterization of the re-emerging West Nile virus in avian species and equids in Israel, 2018, and pathological description of the disease
<p><b>Table 1</b> Details of the examined WNV-positive avian species</p><table><thead><tr><th>Bird no.</th><th>Species</th><th>Date</th><th>Neurological signs</th><th>Intracranial haemorrhages</th><th>Location</th><th>Comments</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>AV148</th><td><i>Larus michahellis</i>, yellow legged seagull</td><td>18 July 2018</td><td>Unknown</td><td>+</td><td>Tel-Aviv</td><td>Found dead</td></tr><tr><th>AV152</th><td><i>Anser anser domesticus</i>, domesticated goose</td><td>18 July 2018</td><td>+</td><td>+</td><td>Burgata a</td><td>Found dead in petting zoo</td></tr><tr><th>AV153</th><td><i>Anser anser domesticus</i>, domesticated goose</td><td>18 July 2018</td><td>Unknown</td><td>+</td><td>Burgata a</td><td>Found dead in petting zoo</td></tr><tr><th>AV156</th><td><i>Asio otus</i>, long eared owl</td><td>18 July 2018</td><td>Unknown</td><td>+</td><td>Hadid</td><td>Hospitalized and died</td></tr><tr><th>AV157</th><td><i>Asio otus</i>, long eared owl</td><td>18 July 2018</td><td>Unknown</td><td>+</td><td>Ramat Razi’el</td><td>Found dead</td></tr><tr><th>AV169</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i>, hooded crow</td><td>18 August 2018</td><td>+</td><td>Unknown</td><td>Rishon Letzion</td><td>Found neurological and died within 24 h</td></tr><tr><th>AV178</th><td><i>Phasianus colchicus</i>, common pheasant</td><td>18 August 2018</td><td>Unknown</td><td>+</td><td>Burgata a</td><td>Found dead in petting zoo</td></tr><tr><th>1459</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i>, hooded crow</td><td>18 October 2018</td><td>−</td><td>Unknown</td><td>Tel-Aviv</td><td>Healthy bird in quarantine</td></tr><tr><th>1505</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i>, hooded crow</td><td>18 October 2018</td><td>Unknown</td><td>+</td><td>Tel-Aviv</td><td>Found dead</td></tr><tr><th>1514</th><td><i>Corvus cornix</i>, hooded crow</td><td>18 October 2018</td><td>+</td><td>Unknown</td><td>Tel-Aviv</td><td>Found sick, died in hospital</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>a</sup> Same petting zoo</p><p><i>KEy</i>: +, characteristic WNF neurological signs observed;−, no characteristic WNF neurological signs observed</p>
Table 4 in Changes in a soil microarthropod community in the vicinity of dominant tree species under trampling management at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel
<p><b>Table 4</b> Correlation coefficients (Pearson correlation, <i>r</i>) between the abundance of microarthropods, diversity indices of soil Acari, and soil parameters at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel, December 2013. SM = soil moisture, OM = organic matter, pH = soil pH, SEC = soil electrical conductivity, SD = soil density, WHC = water-holding capacity <i>p</i>. <*0.05, ** <i>p</i> <0.01, *** <i>p</i> <0.001.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Index</b></th><th></th><th><b>SM</b></th><th><b>OM</b></th><th><b>pH</b></th><th><b>SEC</b></th><th><b>SD</b></th><th><b>WHC</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>Acari</td><td>0.349*</td><td>0.068</td><td>-0.198</td><td>-0.506**</td><td>-0.299</td><td>0.571***</td></tr><tr><th>Abundance</th><td>Collembola Other soil arthropods</td><td>0.153 0.202</td><td>0.210 0.098</td><td>-0.486** -0.294</td><td>-0.506** -0.209</td><td>-0.107 -0.065</td><td>0.207 0.245</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>Total microarthropod</td><td>0.292</td><td>0.158</td><td>-0.403*</td><td>-0.574***</td><td>-0.233</td><td>0.445*</td></tr><tr><th>Diversity indices of Acari</th><td>Taxon richness Shannon index Simpson index</td><td>0.253 0.285 -0.006</td><td>0.023 0.032 -0.175</td><td>-0.098 -0.120 0.165</td><td>-0.392* -0.455** 0.240</td><td>-0.316 -0.293 -0.475**</td><td>0.561*** 0.585*** 0.336</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>Evenness index</td><td>0.387*</td><td>0.009</td><td>-0.203</td><td>-0.466**</td><td>-0.411*</td><td>0.739***</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3 in Molecular characterization of the re-emerging West Nile virus in avian species and equids in Israel, 2018, and pathological description of the disease
<p><b>Table 3</b> Details and calculated viral genome copies of WNF-positive equids</p><table><thead><tr><th>Animal no.</th><th>Species</th><th>Date</th><th>Location</th><th>Tissues tested and calculated target copies per reaction</th><th>Comments</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Eq111 324085</th><td>Horse 1 (2-years-old)</td><td>18 June 2018</td><td>Kfar Shmu’el</td><td>Spleen: negative; brain: 2290</td><td>Euthanized</td></tr><tr><th>Eq115 325209</th><td>Donkey 1 (30-years-old)</td><td>18 July 2018</td><td>Gan Yoshyia</td><td>Brain: 550; spinal cord, CSF,spleen: all negative</td><td>Euthanized</td></tr><tr><th>Eq117 325903</th><td>Horse 2 (11-years-old)</td><td>18 July 2018</td><td>Kfar Truman</td><td>Cerebellum: 550; medulla: 4670; cervical spinal cord: 1990; thoracic spinal cord: 310;lumbar spinal cord: 680; spleen: negative; serum: negative</td><td>Euthanized</td></tr><tr><th>Eq142 333326</th><td>Horse 3 (20- years-old)</td><td>18 October 2018</td><td>Kfar Sirkin</td><td>NS2A probe: cerebellum: 4000; medulla: 56,400</td><td>Euthanized</td></tr></tbody></table>
Figure 20 in The Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Trombidiformes) of Israel
Figure 20 Obdulia tamaricisPritchard & Baker: dorsal view of female.
Figure 24 in The Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Trombidiformes) of Israel
Figure 24 Tenuipalpus dubininiReck – Female: A – dorsal view; B – ventral view.
Figure 12 in The Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Trombidiformes) of Israel
Figure 12 Capedulia maritimaGerson & Smith Meyer: dorsal view of female.
Figure 3 in The Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Trombidiformes) of Israel
Figure 3 Aegyptobia salixiZaher & Yousef – Female, dorsal view.
Figure 25 in The Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Trombidiformes) of Israel
Figure 25 Tenuipalpus granatiSayed – Female: A – dorsal view; B – opisthogaster; C – spermatheca.
Figure 18 in The Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Trombidiformes) of Israel
Figure 18 Cenopalpus wainsteini(Livshitz & Mitrofanov): dorsal view of female.
Figure 21 in The Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Trombidiformes) of Israel
Figure 21 Phyllotetranychus aegyptiacusSayed: dorsal view of female.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.