Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,356
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,356 results for “RED”
FIGURE 2 in Ankerius aenigmaticus, a new genus and new species of aphanodactylid crab symbiotic with polychaetes from the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Aphanodactylidae)
FIGURE 2. Ankerius aenigmaticus gen. et sp. nov., female holotype (7.2 × 7.0 mm) (UF), Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia. A, overall habitus; B, frontal view of cephalothorax; C, ventral view of cephalothorax showing thoracic sternum and vulvae.
FIGURE 5. Buccal cavity and third maxillipeds. A in Ankerius aenigmaticus, a new genus and new species of aphanodactylid crab symbiotic with polychaetes from the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Aphanodactylidae)
FIGURE 5. Buccal cavity and third maxillipeds. A, Selwynia laevis Borradaile, 1903, holotype male (7.1 × 5.6 mm) (CUMZ I. 63872), Hulule Atoll, Maldives, coll. J. S. Gardiner, 1900; B, Gandoa brevipes (H. Milne Edwards, 1853), female (7.2 × 5.0 mm) (ZSM 1277 / 1) [holotype of Voeltzkowia zanzibarensis Lenz, 1905], Kokotoni, Zanzibar, coll. July 1889; C, Gustavus mecognathus Ahyong & Ng, 2009, paratype female (13.9 × 8.0 mm) (ZRC 2010.0252), SW Cocos Barrier, Guam, near small pass on large terebellid worm, coll. G. Paulay, 20 March 2000; D, Ankerius aenigmaticus gen. et sp. nov., female holotype (7.2 × 7.0 mm) (UF), Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia.
Categorical perception for red and brown
<p>This data supplements the article:</p> <p>Witzel, C., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2016). Categorical perception for red and brown. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 42(4), 540-570. doi:10.1037/xhp0000154</p> <p>The Excell-file with the data includes 3 sheets:</p> <p><strong>Sheet 1 (jnd): </strong>JND data from Figure 4.a of the above article.</p> <p>- columns = 20 test colours.</p> <p>- rows = 14 observers.</p> <p><strong>Sheet 2 (rt): </strong>Response time data from Figure 6.a of the above article.</p> <p>- columns = three kinds of colour pairs (AB, BC, & CD) and the location of the target (left vs. right).</p> <p>- rows = 15 observers.</p> <p><strong>Sheet 3 (er): </strong>Error rates from Figure 6.b of the above article.</p> <p>- columns and rows as in sheet 2.</p>
Fig. 4 in Changes In The Structure Of Nest Complexes Of The Red Wood Ants Formica Rufa And F. Polyctena (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) In Urban Forests
Fig. 4. Degradation of the Formica rufa complex No. 1 (Feofaniya) in terms of average height (4, A) and diameter (4, B) under conditions of intensive construction and recreation; 4, С, D — diameter and height near the nest complex of F. polyctena No. 4 (surroundings of the Observatory), under conditions of felling of the shrub layer and processing of fallen trunks and branches into wood chips.
Figure 4 in Changes In The Structure Of Nest Complexes Of The Red Wood Ants Formica Rufa And F. Polyctena (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) In Urban Forests
Figure 4 shows the degradation trends for the nest complexes of F. rufa No. 1 (4, A, B), F. polyctena No. 4 (4, C, D). For F. rufa No. 1, there was a sharp decrease in the average diameter of anthills in 2014, and on the contrary, an increase since 2015 (fig. 4, A). In 2016, this indicator remained at approximately the same level, and in 2021 it decreased again. In 2022, this nest complex
Fig. 1 in Changes In The Structure Of Nest Complexes Of The Red Wood Ants Formica Rufa And F. Polyctena (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) In Urban Forests
Fig. 1. Location of nest complexes of Formica rufa (diamonds), F. polyctena (triangles) on the territory of the city of Kyiv (Ukraine). The city limits are marked by a red line, the forest areas by dark grey. The numbers correspond to the serial number of each complex.
Figure 13 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 13. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) Antenna; (B) labrum, anterior; (C) same, posterior; (D) mandible, showing individual elements; (E) maxillule; (F) maxilla; (G) maxilliped, anterior; (H) paragnaths, ventral.
Figure 6 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 6. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, elongate form (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) urosome, dorsal, seta V on CR omitted [b: P5-bearing somite, ventral, showing midventral spinous processes, exopodal setae omitted]; (C) P4, endopod, anterior, showing reduced inner setae on second segment. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female (Adriatic Sea). (D) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern on prosome not fully discerned; (E) urosome, dorsal; (F) caudal ramus, dorsal, seta VII shown separately; (G) P4, endopod, posterior.
Figure 9 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 9. Spinoncaea humesi sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) Antenna; (B) labrum, anterior; (C) same, posterior; (D) mandible, showing individual elements; (E) maxillule; (F) maxilla; (G) maxilliped, anterior.
Figure 4 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 4. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Red Sea). (A) P1, anterior [a: second endopod segment, arrow indicating ornamentation on inner margin]; (B) P2, anterior, intercoxal sclerite not shown; (C) P3, posterior; (D) P4, anterior, intercoxal sclerite not shown.
Figure 3 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 3. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Red Sea). (A) Antenna, lateral elements are numbered using Roman numerals, distal elements are identified by capital letters; (B) labrum, anterior; (C) same, posterior; (D) mandible, showing individual elements, which are identified by capital letters; (E) maxillule; (F) maxilla; (G) maxilliped, anterior.
Figure 1 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 1. Location of stations. ' = VALDIVIA-Cruise 29, October 1980; - = METEOR-Cruise 5/1, January 1987; • = METEOR-Cruise 5/3b, May 1987; ' = METEOR-Cruise 5/5, July/August 1987; · = METEOR-Cruise 44/2, March 1999.
Figure 5 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 5. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., male (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) maxilliped, anterior [b: same, medial view, claw partly omitted]; (C) maxilliped, posterior; (D) urosome, dorsal, seta V on CR omitted; (E) urosome, ventral; (F) same, lateral; (G) antennule, small middle aesthetasc close to seta figured separately.
Figure 8 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 8. Spinoncaea humesi sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) same, lateral (appendages omitted); (C) urosome, dorsal; (D) urosome, lateral; (E) P5-bearing somite (setae on left side omitted) and genital double-somite, ventral; (F) caudal ramus, dorsal; (G) antennule; (H) leg 5, lateral; (I) same, dorsal; (J) genital aperture.
Figure 16 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 16. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., female (Adriatic Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern on prosome not discerned; (B) urosome, dorsal; (C) P4, posterior. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., male (Adriatic Sea) (D) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern not fully discerned.
Figure 2 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 2. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) same, lateral (appendages omitted); (C) urosome, dorsal, seta V on left side missing; (D) urosome, lateral; (E) P5-bearing somite and genital double-somite, ventral; (F) caudal ramus, dorsal, lanceolate seta V shown separately; (G) antennule; (H) leg 5, dorsal; (I) same, ventral; (J) genital aperture; (K) paired egg-sac [note the scale].
Figure 15 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 15. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., male (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) maxilliped, anterior, syncoxa missing [b: inner margin of basis, posterior]; (C) maxilliped, medial view; (D) urosome, dorsal, seta V omitted; (E) urosome, ventral, seta V on right side omitted; (F) same, lateral; (G) antennule [g: inner margin of segments 1–3, showing ornamentation].
Figure 14 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 14. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) P1, anterior; (B) P2, anterior; (C) P3, posterior; (D) P4, posterior, intercoxal sclerite not shown.
Figure 11 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 11. Spinoncaea humesi sp. nov., male (Red Sea) (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) maxilliped, anterior; (C) maxilliped, medial view; (D) urosome, dorsal, seta V on left side missing; (E) urosome, ventral; (F) same, lateral; (G) antennule, middle aesthetasc on segment 4 arrowed.
Figure 7 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 7. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Monterey Bay). (A) Urosome, dorsal. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., male (Adriatic Sea). (B) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern on prosome not discerned.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.