Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2009View details →

Fig. 8 in New palaeoscolecidan worms from the Lower Cambrian: Sirius Passet, Latham Shale and Kinzers Shale

Fig. 8. Un−named early Cambrian palaeoscolecidans from the Latham Shale, Marble Mountains, California (A) and Kinzers Formation, south−eastern Pennsylvania (B–D). A. UCR 7003/1, counterpart (A1), part (A2), and detail of body (A3). B. NMNH&S P−V−80. C. NMNH&S P−V−81. D. NMNH&S P−V−10. Scale bars 10 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2009View details →

Fig. 6 in New palaeoscolecidan worms from the Lower Cambrian: Sirius Passet, Latham Shale and Kinzers Shale

Fig. 6. Scanning electron micrographs of Xystoscolex boreogyrus gen. et sp. nov (A, E) and Chalazoscolex pharkus gen. et sp. nov (B–D, F), lower Cambrian (Series 2, Stage 3), Buen Formation, Sirius Passet Fossil−Lagerstätte, Peary Land, North Greenland. A. MGUH 291560, scalids of the introvert, see also Fig. 4E. B. MGUH 29133, grooves and ridges on the introvert, see also Fig. 1A. C. MGUH 29136, segments of trunk showing longitudinal cuticular ridges, see also Fig. 2B. D. MGUH 29141, posterior trunk with larger sclerites, see also Fig. 2G. E. MGUH 29144, detail of scalid, distal point to upper right, see also Fig. 3C. F. MGUH 29148, segments with rows of sclerites and intervening unarmoured areas of cuticle (F1) and scalids of introvert (F2), see also Fig. 4B. Scale bars 400 µm (A+F1), otherwise 300 µm. All specimens coated with gold film.

Fig. 2 in DNA sequencing confirms meningeal worm (Parelaphostrongylus tenuis) and muscle worm (Parelaphostrongylus andersoni) in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): Implications for moose (Alces alces) management

Fig. 2. Summary of Parelaphostrongylus spp. infection in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fecal samples collected in Western Manitoba. Partial CO1 and ITS-2 genetic sequence results found white-tailed deer fecal samples with Parelaphostrongylus andersoni and Parelaphostrongylus tenuis in game hunting area (GHA) 13, 18 and 27 and only P. tenuis infected fecal pellets in GHA 22. GHA 13 and 18 (blue) are areas where moose populations are a management concern whereas GHAs 22 and 27 (yellow) are areas where moose populations are not a management concern. GHAs 18 and 22 were sampled in 2020 (light colors) while GHAs 13 and 27 were sampled in 2021 (dark colors). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 9 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 9. Size differences between infected and non-infected cormorants. The black line represents the median length (a and b) and median weight (c). The grey box represents the middle 50% of the data (n = 65).

Fig. 7 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 7. Size differences of cormorants between Kustavi and Airisto in terms of body length and body weight (n = 65). The black line represents the median length and weight. The grey box represents the middle 50% of the data (n = 65).

Fig. 6 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 6. Left: Body length of herring in the Archipelago Sea (n = 1167) and the Bothnian Sea (n = 1528) in 2018 and in the infected and non-infected herring (n = 7002). The black line represents the median length, and the grey box is the middle 50% of the data.

Fig. 2 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 2. Mean annual salinity (PSU) and temperature (T, ◦C) of the winter months (January–April) in the Bothnian Sea at 0–50 m depth during 1980–2021. Data from ICES Oceanographic dataset, 2021. ICES, Copenhagen.

Fig. 8 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 8. Size differences of cormorants between sexes (a, b, and c) and adults and juveniles (d, e, and f). The black line represents the median length (a, b, d, and e) and median weight (c and f). The grey box represents the middle 50% of the data (n = 65).

Fig. 1 in DNA sequencing confirms meningeal worm (Parelaphostrongylus tenuis) and muscle worm (Parelaphostrongylus andersoni) in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): Implications for moose (Alces alces) management

Fig. 1. Average dorsal-spined larvae (DSL) prevalence in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fecal samples in each game hunting area (GHA) sampled in Manitoba in 2020 and 2021. For trips, early summer collection was in June, mid-summer was July–August and late summer was August–September. GHA 13 and 18 (blue) are areas where moose populations are a management concern whereas GHAs 22 and 27 (yellow) are areas where moose populations are not a management concern. GHAs 18 and 22 were sampled in 2020 (light colors) while GHAs 13 and 27 were sampled in 2021 (dark colors). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 3 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 3. Acanthocephala parasites in the body cavity of a herring (left; the red circle indicates the position of worms) and on the inner surface of the intestine of a cormorant (right). The upper photo indicates the size of parasites compared to a match (photos: J. Sahlst´en). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 1. Map showing the sampling sites in the northern Baltic Sea: A = Archipelago Sea, B = Uusikaupunki, C = Merikarvia. The sampling locations in region A: 1 = Taivassalo, 2 = Velkua trawl area, 3 = western Rym¨attyl¨a, 4 = northern Airisto Inlet, 5 = Peimari.

Fig. 5 in The prevalence of Corynosoma parasite worms in the great cormorants and the Baltic herring in the northern Baltic Sea, Finland

Fig. 5. Prevalence (%) of the corynosoma infection in the Baltic herring in the Bothnian Sea (n = 1528) and the Archipelago Sea in 2018 (n = 1167). The black solid line expresses a linear trend: y = 7.55x + 6.33, r = 1.00.

opennotspecifiedAug 2024View details →

World Register of Marine Species: WoRMS->EOL taxon ID map

The aim of a World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) is to provide an authoritative and comprehensive list of names of marine organisms, including information on synonymy. WoRMS data published to EOL include taxon names and classification, images and Notes, and attribute data including Environment and Distribution.Column 1: WoRMS ID Column 2: EOL ID

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

Supporting Images to "A new species of velvet worm of the genus Oroperipatus (Onychophora: Peripatidae) from western Amazonia"

Raw photographs, without brightness and contrast adjustments, corresponding to those shown in Figure 3 of "A new species of velvet worm of the genus Oroperipatus (Onychophora: Peripatidae) from western Amazonia". Photographs published in Figure 3 were obtained by stacking using CombineZP 1.0 software, and then adjusted for brightness and contrast to highlight taxonomically important structures with Adobe Photoshop CC 2020 software (Adobe Systems, USA). Fig. 3. Tegument and legs morphology of Oroperipatus tiputini sp. nov. A. Dorsal integument. B. Ventral detail of right leg V showing five spinous pads and nephridial tubercule (np) indented at third spinous pad. C. Genital pad and pregenital legs of right side showing crural tubercules pointed by white arrows. Scales bars: 1 mm (A), 0.2 mm (B), 0.4 mm (C).

Fig. 6 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 6. Reconstructions of the palaeoscolecid worms Cricicosmia and Tabelliscolex (modified from Huang 2005b). A. Cricocosmia jinningensis; A1, whole animal; A2, typical lateral sclerite of Cricocosmia jinningensis. B. Tabelliscolex hexagonus. C. Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov.

Fig. 3 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 3. Element maps of Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 1988 from the Early Cambrian of Chengjiang, China show that the lateral sclerites of Cricocosmia have elevated content of oxygen and ferrum and depleted silicon and aluminium compared with other areas of the trunk. A small amount of phosphorus is present on the surface of the trunk, possibly indicating the presence of apatite. The first image is of the anterior cone−shaped sclerites shown in Fig. 2A2, ELI−0001402.

Fig. 5 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 5. Element maps of Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov. from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. Mapping area is the upper right part in Fig. 4A1, ELI−0001219. Images show that lateral sclerites of Tabelliscolex maanshanensis are composed predominantly of silicon, oxygen, and aluminum, with lesser amounts of iron, potassium, and magnesium.

Fig. 4 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 4. SEM−BSE images of uncoated specimens of Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian of Chengjiang, China. A. Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov., ELI−0001219, holotype; A1, molted elongate sclerites; A2, shows the tubercles and the pits on the inner side; A3, showing each pit has a inner circlet of concentric laminae; A4, close−up showing the pit and the inner lamina. B. Tabelliscolex hexagonus Han, Zhang, and Shu, 2003a, ELI−0001218, holotype; B1, two over−lapping plates, one plate showing the tubercles (B2) and another showing the pits (B3); B4, the skeleton of the plate, noting the framboidal pyrites within the skeleton; B5, close−up showing framboidal pyrites replicated by finer minerals (B6); B7, close−up of the pit; B8, some needle−like minerals within the pit in B7.

Fig. 2 in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic presentation of the trunk ornamentation in Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 2003 from the Earlyn Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. A. ELI−0001402, lateral spines from the anterior trunk (rectangle area in Fig. 1C); A1, one of the plate−shape sclerites with a net structure; the anterior part of the sclerites is broken; A2, one of the cone−shaped sclerites with net−like structure; note the size of the circlet decreases distally; A3, showing the net−like structure; A4, the net−like structure consists of numerous finer spiculate minerals; A5, trunk cuticle surrounding the sclerite consists of bright larger octahedral pyrites, which are also composed of numerous micro−spiculate minerals. B. ELI−0001403, lateral spines from the posterior trunk; B1, the lateral sclerites showing a bright white high−contrast colour with surrounding trunk cuticle (rectangle area in Fig. 1D); B2, a lateral spine consisting of many tubercles; B3, showing the tubercles. C. ELI−0001404, showing the lateral sclerites with tubercles.

Fig. 1. Early Cambrian palaeoscolecid worms from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. A–E in Trunk ornament on the palaeoscolecid worms Cricocosmia and Tabelliscolex from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits of China

Fig. 1. Early Cambrian palaeoscolecid worms from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang deposits, China. A–E. Cricocosmia jinningensis Hou and Sun, 1988. A. ELI−0001400, showing the ventral trunk spines (arrow) of Cricocosmia. B. ELI−0001401, showing the ventral trunk spines (arrow); B2 is the rectangle area on B1. C. ELI−0001402; C1, a complete specimen; C2, lateral spines at the anterior portion of the trunk (rectangle area in C1) preserved fine structure; C3, showing the preserved microstructure of the lateral spines, note that sclerites colored black can preserve finer structure than those of yellow, and that sclerites showing finer structures are apparently dislocated probably due to molting. D. ELI−0001403; D1, a complete specimen; D2, posterior portion of the body (rectangle area in D1) with several spines (arrows pointed) bearing fine structures. E. ELI−0001404; E1, a fragmental specimen in burrowing; E2, showing the trunk sclerites (arrows pointed) with a net−like structure; the marginal ridges are evident on these sclerites. F. Tabelliscolex hexagonus Han, Zhang, and Shu, 2003a, ELI−0001218, holotype, showing the general outline. G. Tabelliscolex maanshanensis sp. nov., ELI−0001219, showing molted trunk sclerites.