Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 1 in Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula

Figure 1. Cape Shirreff, Livingston Island, Antarctica. The black star in the right pane indicates the location of Cape Shirreff in the western Antarctic Peninsula region.

Figure 4 in Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula

Figure 4. Comparison by dive types between (A) behavior predicted from the k-means cluster analysis of time-depth dive records (n = 38,338) and (B) behavior manually scored from animal-borne video dive data (n = 309).

Figure 3 in Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula

Figure 3. The mean proportion (with SD whiskers) of dives that were classified into each dive type (1–4) for all dives in the cluster data set (n = 38,338).

Figure 2 in Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula

Figure 2. (A) Empirical haul-out probability distributions for leopard seals at Cape Shirreff based on 209 haul outs from 18 animals in January and February from 2008 to 2014. (B) A polynomial linear regression (solid line) which predicts haul-out probability based on time (h) from local apparent noon; 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines).

Fig. 2 in The current breeding status of Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia in the Amur River Basin

Fig. 2. Observation and accounting of Eurasian Spoonbill nests in China: 1–2 — Qixinghe National Nature Reserve; 3 — Xingkaihu National Nature Reserve Рис. 2. НабΛюÃение и учет гнезÃ коΛпицы в Китае: 1–2 — заповеÃник Ци Синхэ; 3 — заповеÃник Синкайху

Fig. 4. A in The current breeding status of Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia in the Amur River Basin

Fig. 4. A fragment of the coastline of Lake Khanka, namely the mouth of the Ilistaya River: A — 2015; B — 2020; 1 — location of the colony of Eurasian Spoonbill in 2018; 2 — location of the colony of Eurasian Spoonbill in 2019 Рис. 4. Фрагмент береговой Λинии оз. Ханка, а именно устья р. ИΛистой: А — 2015 г.; Б — 2020 г.; 1 — местонахожÃение коΛонии коΛпицы в 2018 г.; 2 — местонахожÃение коΛонии коΛпицы в 2019 г.

Fig. 1. A in The current breeding status of Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia in the Amur River Basin

Fig. 1. A fragment of a colony of Herons (Grey Heron, Black-crowned Night Heron) at the mouth of the Ilistaya River with the nests of Eurasian Spoonbill, 15 May 2019 Рис. 1. Фрагмент коΛонии цапеΛь (серая цапΛя, кваква) в устье р. ИΛистой с гнезÃами коΛпицы, 15 мая 2019 г.

Fig. 3. A in The current breeding status of Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia in the Amur River Basin

Fig. 3. A map of the distribution of Eurasian Spoonbill in the Amur River Basin: points 1–2 — Zabaykalsky Krai: 1 — Torey Lakes; 2 — Argun River; points 3–4 — Primorsky Krai: 3 — mouth of the Ilistaya River; 4 — mouth of the Gnilaya River; points 5-6 — the territory China: 5 — Xingkaihu National Nature Reserve; 6 — Qixinghe National Nature Reserve; point 7 — Amur Krai, surroundings of the city of Blagoveshchensk; point 8 — Jewish Autonomous Oblast, Lake Zabelovskoe; point 9 — Khabarovsk Krai, surroundings of the village Malyshevo. Red color — places of current Spoonbill nesting, purple color —possible nesting places of Spoonbill or places where Spoonbill used to nest Рис. 3. Карта распространения коΛпицы в бассейне Амура: точки 1–2 — ЗабайкаΛьский край: 1 — Торейские озера; 2 — р. Аргунь; точки 3–4 — Приморский край: 3 — устье р. ИΛистой; 4 — устье р. ГниΛая; точки 5-6 — территория Китая: 5 — национаΛьный заповеÃник Синкайху; 6 — национаΛьный заповеÃник Ци Синхэ; точка 7 — Амурская обΛасть, окрестности г. БΛаговещенска; точка 8 — Еврейская АО, озеро ЗабеΛовское; точка 9 — Хабаровский край, окрестности посеΛка МаΛышево. Красный цвет — места текущего гнезÃования коΛпицы, фиоΛетовый цвет — возможные места гнезÃования коΛпицы иΛи места, гÃе раньше гнезÃиΛась коΛпица

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 1. ГнезΔовые биотопы чернобровой камышевки: a — опушка Λеса со спирейно-папоротниковым поΔΛеском на р. Самарга; b — спирейно-зΛакововая опушка в б. Сизиман Fig. 1. Breeding biotopes of the black-browed warbler: a — forest edge with spireal-fern undergrowth on the Samarga river; b — spirey-cereal edge in the Siziman Bay in in the Ussuri region

Рис. 1. ГнезΔовые биотопы чернобровой камышевки: a — опушка Λеса со спирейно-папоротниковым поΔΛеском на р. Самарга; b — спирейно-зΛакововая опушка в б. Сизиман Fig. 1. Breeding biotopes of the black-browed warbler: a — forest edge with spireal-fern undergrowth on the Samarga river; b — spirey-cereal edge in the Siziman Bay

Рис. 10. Основные параметры гнезΑовой активности маΛого воΛчка: a) Αинамика обогрева кΛаΑок и птенцов; b) среΑнее коΛичество покормΛенных птенцов за оΑно кормΛение; c) среΑнесуточное коΛичество покормΛенных птенцов за час; d) среΑнесуточная активность выкармΛивания птенцов Fig. 10. The main parameters of nesting activity of the little bittern: (a) dynamics of heating clutches and nestlings; (b) average number of nestlings fed per feeding; (c) average daily number of nestlings fed per hour; (d) average daily feeding activity in The first case of breeding of little bittern Ixobrychus minutus and hybrids of I. minutus with I. sinensis in the Russian Far East

Рис. 10. Основные параметры гнезΑовой активности маΛого воΛчка: a) Αинамика обогрева кΛаΑок и птенцов; b) среΑнее коΛичество покормΛенных птенцов за оΑно кормΛение; c) среΑнесуточное коΛичество покормΛенных птенцов за час; d) среΑнесуточная активность выкармΛивания птенцов Fig. 10. The main parameters of nesting activity of the little bittern: (a) dynamics of heating clutches and nestlings; (b) average number of nestlings fed per feeding; (c) average daily number of nestlings fed per hour; (d) average daily feeding activity

Рис. 7. Δиаграмма распреΑеΛения Αанных, построенная на основе принципа гΛавных коорΑинат. Розовым цветом показана выборка по маΛому воΛчку (n=32), синим — по китайскому воΛчку (n=10) Fig. 7. Data distribution diagram based on the principal coordinates. The pink colour shows the sample for the little bittern (n=32), and the blue colour — for the yellow bittern (n=10) in The first case of breeding of little bittern Ixobrychus minutus and hybrids of I. minutus with I. sinensis in the Russian Far East

Рис. 7. Δиаграмма распреΑеΛения Αанных, построенная на основе принципа гΛавных коорΑинат. Розовым цветом показана выборка по маΛому воΛчку (n=32), синим — по китайскому воΛчку (n=10) Fig. 7. Data distribution diagram based on the principal coordinates. The pink colour shows the sample for the little bittern (n=32), and the blue colour — for the yellow bittern (n=10)

Рис. 6. СΛетки китайского (a) и маΛого воΛчка (b) в возрасте 2 неΑеΛь Fig. 6. Fledglings of two-week-old yellow (a) and little (b) bitterns in The first case of breeding of little bittern Ixobrychus minutus and hybrids of I. minutus with I. sinensis in the Russian Far East

Рис. 6. СΛетки китайского (a) и маΛого воΛчка (b) в возрасте 2 неΑеΛь Fig. 6. Fledglings of two-week-old yellow (a) and little (b) bitterns

Рис. 3. РазΛичия в окраске верха крыΛа гибриΑной особи (a) и типичных преΑставитеΛей маΛого и китайского воΛчков (сΛева — взросΛые ♂♂, справа — ♀♀): a — ♂ 2008–2010 гг., b, c — маΛый воΛчок, d, e —китайский воΛчок Fig. 3. Differences in the colouration of the upper wing part of a hybrid individual (a) and typical individuals of the little bittern and the yellow bittern (left — adult ♂♂, right — ♀♀): a — ♂ 2008–2010; b, c — little bittern; d, e — yellow bittern in The first case of breeding of little bittern Ixobrychus minutus and hybrids of I. minutus with I. sinensis in the Russian Far East

Рис. 3. РазΛичия в окраске верха крыΛа гибриΑной особи (a) и типичных преΑставитеΛей маΛого и китайского воΛчков (сΛева — взросΛые ♂♂, справа — ♀♀): a — ♂ 2008–2010 гг., b, c — маΛый воΛчок, d, e —китайский воΛчок Fig. 3. Differences in the colouration of the upper wing part of a hybrid individual (a) and typical individuals of the little bittern and the yellow bittern (left — adult ♂♂, right — ♀♀): a — ♂ 2008–2010; b, c — little bittern; d, e — yellow bittern

Рис. 4. МаΛый (сΛева) и китайский (справа) воΛчки в ювениΛьном наряΑе (возраст — 6 неΑеΛь) Fig. 4. Little bittern (left) and yellow bittern (right) in juvenile plumage (age 6 weeks) in The first case of breeding of little bittern Ixobrychus minutus and hybrids of I. minutus with I. sinensis in the Russian Far East

Рис. 4. МаΛый (сΛева) и китайский (справа) воΛчки в ювениΛьном наряΑе (возраст — 6 неΑеΛь) Fig. 4. Little bittern (left) and yellow bittern (right) in juvenile plumage (age 6 weeks)

Рис. 5. Особенности окраски верха гоΛовы (a), спинных перьев (b) и верха крыΛа (c) у моΛоΑых птиц маΛого (a — сверху, b — сΛева, c — справа) и китайского (a — снизу, b — справа, c — сΛева) воΛчков Fig. 5. Colouration of the upper head (a), dorsal feathers (b), and upper covers (c) in young birds of little (a — above; b — left; c — right) and yellow (a — below; b — right; c — left) bitterns in The first case of breeding of little bittern Ixobrychus minutus and hybrids of I. minutus with I. sinensis in the Russian Far East

Рис. 5. Особенности окраски верха гоΛовы (a), спинных перьев (b) и верха крыΛа (c) у моΛоΑых птиц маΛого (a — сверху, b — сΛева, c — справа) и китайского (a — снизу, b — справа, c — сΛева) воΛчков Fig. 5. Colouration of the upper head (a), dorsal feathers (b), and upper covers (c) in young birds of little (a — above; b — left; c — right) and yellow (a — below; b — right; c — left) bitterns

Fig. 5 in Helminth community structure in two species of arctic-breeding waterfowl

Fig. 5. Predicted helminth infection intensity for combined cestodes identified in Pacific black brant (BLBR) and greater white-fronted geese (GWFG) collected in two locations (i.e., Arctic and Subarctic) in Alaska (2014). Circles represent predicted means and error bars denote 85% confidence intervals. Predictions are based off the most supported model from AICc selection and all interactions include lower-order effects (see title).

Fig. 4 in Helminth community structure in two species of arctic-breeding waterfowl

Fig. 4. Predicted prevalence (top) and helminth infection intensity (bottom) for the cestode Drepanidotaenia lanceolata enumerated in Pacific black brant (BLBR) and greater whitefronted geese (GWFG) collected in Arctic and Subarctic Alaska (2014). Circles represent predicted means and error bars denote 85% confidence intervals. Predictions are based off the most supported model from AICc selection and all interactions include lower-order effects (see titles).

Fig. 6 in Helminth community structure in two species of arctic-breeding waterfowl

Fig. 6. Predicted prevalence (top) and helminth infection intensity (bottom) for the cestode Tschertkovilepis setigera enumerated in Pacific black brant (BLBR) and greater whitefronted geese (GWFG) collected in Arctic and Subarctic Alaska (2014). Circles represent predicted means and error bars denote 85% confidence intervals. Predictions are based off the most supported model from AICc selection and all interactions include lower-order effects (see titles).

Fig. 2 in Helminth community structure in two species of arctic-breeding waterfowl

Fig. 2. Predicted helminth species richness (SR) for Pacific black brant (BLBR) and greater white-fronted geese (GWFG) collected from Subarctic and Arctic Alaska (2014). Circles represent predicted means and error bars denote 85% confidence intervals. Predictions are based on the most supported model from AICc selection and all interactions include lower-order effects (see title).

Fig. 3 in Helminth community structure in two species of arctic-breeding waterfowl

Fig. 3. Predicted prevalence (top) and helminth infection intensity (bottom) for the nematode Trichostrongylus tenuis enumerated in Pacific black brant (BLBR) and greater whitefronted geese (GWFG) collected in Arctic and Subarctic Alaska (2014). Circles represent predicted means and error bars denote 85% confidence intervals. Predictions are based off the most supported model from AICc selection and all interactions include lower-order effects (see titles).