Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
670
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
670 results for “review study”
FIGURE 14, A–I. Mastigaphoides haffneri Weidner. A in Studies in Australian Katydids: A Review of the Australian Snub-nosed Sylvan katydids (Tettigoniidae; Pseudophyllinae; Simoderini)
FIGURE 14, A–I. Mastigaphoides haffneri Weidner. A, head, prnotum, Condong male. B, fastigium of vertex and head. C, lateral lobe of pronotum. D, base of tegmen, Condong male. E, sternum Condong male. F, tip of abdomen, Nat. Pk male. G, subgenital plate, Lansdown female. H, ovipositor. I, adult male, Mt Glorious, Qld.
FIGURE 4, A–L. Chloracantha lampra Hebard. A, adult female. B in Studies in Australian Katydids: A Review of the Australian Snub-nosed Sylvan katydids (Tettigoniidae; Pseudophyllinae; Simoderini)
FIGURE 4, A–L. Chloracantha lampra Hebard. A, adult female. B, adult male lateral view, note colour of ventral margin of lateral pronotal lobe and tegminal spotting. C, head and pronotum. D, head. E, male tegmen, note stridulatory region. F, stridulatory file. G, male subgenital plate. H, tip of ovipositor. I, entire ovipositor. J, male titillator, note sheath. K, female subgenital plate, ventral view. L, female subgenital plate, lateral view.
Dataset of the Paper: Demystifying Code Snippets in Code Reviews: A Study of the OpenStack and Qt Communities and A Practitioner Survey
<p>This dataset, which is composed of two parts: the code review data collected from OpenStack and Qt, and the survey data collected from industrial developers, was used to conduct an empirical study on code snippets in code reviews. A brief description of each part of the dataset is provided below:</p> <p><strong>1. Dataset (OpenStack+Qt).xlsx</strong></p> <p>contains 127,182 review comments mined from four popular projects of the OpenStack community (Nova and Neutron) and the Qt community (Qt Base and Qt Creator) from 2020 to 2021. Among the review comments, 3,197 review comments contain code snippets. In the Excel file, for the rows of review comments with code snippets, we marked the code snippets in red color as an indicator.</p> <p><strong>2. Dataset (Survey).xlsx</strong></p> <p>contains 63 valid responses to our survey questionnaire from industrial developers of OpenStack, Qt, and LinkedIn.</p>
A systematic review of global road ecology camera trap studies that monitored animals' use of wildlife crossings in road-fragmented landscapes
<p>Much research has emphasised the importance of incorporating wildlife crossing-structures in the design of road networks to facilitate connectivity of wildlife crossings in road-fragmented landscapes. Although camera traps have been effective in monitoring wildlife crossing structures, limited studies explore camera trap protocol to monitor wildlife use of crossing structures, particularly in Africa. Our study reviewed and assessed camera trap peer-reviewed research that monitored the use of crossing-structures by wildlife to navigate landscapes fragmented by roads. We found 70 camera trap peer-reviewed publications from 2001 to 2022 that monitored wildlife use of crossing-structures in landscapes intersected by roads, and these were from 22 countries and six continents. The included peer-reviewed studies varied significantly globally, with geographical trends indicating that most studies were conducted in North America. However, the methods used varied considerably between studies, especially in terms of camera trap placement protocol (placement height of camera trap, survey length, and camera multi-shot settings). This showed that camera trap usage for monitoring animal use of crossing structures is still an emerging area of research, and there is a potential for developing a standardised protocol for each type of crossing structure design and size. Future camera trap studies exploring wildlife use of crossing-structures should consider monitoring existing crossing structures (culverts, bridges, and tunnels) as this provides a less costly method of restoring landscape connectivity. We recommend that further research develop a standardised camera trap protocol for monitoring wildlife using crossing-structures to reduce the threats to biodiversity.</p>
Systematic review for optimizing sample size in dairy cow methane emission studies: a comprehensive methodological approach
<p>Collection of research data focusing on methane (CH4) emissions from dairy cows across various breeds and conditions. The dataset encompasses a range of studies published from 2012 to 2023, each documented with specific parameters including the study title, authors, country of research, cow breed, lactation status, methods used for CH4 measurement, experimental designs, CH4 yield and its variability, dry matter intake, and diet composition.</p>
FIGURE 22 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 22. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of a curated Heteroclinus specimen dataset, based on the analysis of (A) concatenated mitochondrial DNA COI, 16S, and ND2 gene fragments (1,774 total base pairs), as well as (B) concatenated nuclear rhod and S7 gene fragments (1,348 total base pairs). Specimens are described by putative species name and voucher registration numbers. Bayesian posterior probability values followed by maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap values, are provided for relationships among species. The ML topology recovered was identical to the Bayesian topology, and so only the latter is presented.
FIGURE 21 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 21. First dorsal ray length in Heteroclinus whitleyi (black circles) and H. heptaeolus (green triangles).
FIGURE 18 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 18. Second dorsal spine length in high dorsal fin species (black circles for H. wilsoni and H. colemani) versus species with short dorsal fin (green triangles for H. heptaeolus, H. longicauda and H. whitleyi).
FIGURE 14 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 14. Body depth at anal origin as a percentage of standard length (y-axis) versus standard length in mm (x-axis) in Heteroclinus heptaeolus. The line indicates the predicted proportion from regression analysis showing proportion increase with increasing size.
FIGURE 17 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 17. Analysis of 80 regression analyses. The y-axis indicates number of regressions, whereas the x-axis represents of deviation of the means of the proportions from the slope of the regression lines calculated as (mean of proportion – slope)/slope, expressed as a percentage deviation showing a poor match between slope of regression and means of proportions. Positive values indicate the means of the proportions are higher than the slope and negative values, less than the slope.
PLATE 5 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
PLATE 5. Freshly collected specimens of Heteroclinus whitleyi from New South Wales: A) holotype, AMS I.17019-022, 52.9 mm SL female from Long Reef, Sydney, photographed several days after capture; B) AMS I.20095-057, male from Arrawarra not measured; C) AMS I.45027-034, male, 41.5 mm SL, Mollymook, photo by M. McGrouther; D) AMS I.45025-047, male, 34mm SL, Mollymook, photo by M. McGrouther.
PLATE 3 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
PLATE 3. Freshly collected specimens and live Heteroclinus heptaeolus: A) AMS I.20162-019, Kangaroo Island, South Australia; B) WAM P.27959-017. 64 mm SL male, Kalbarri. Western Australia, probable identification; C) AMS I.21774-005, 55 mm SL male, Batemans Bay, New South Wales; D) Underwater photo from Port Kembla, New South Wales, photo by S. Schulz.
FIGURE 8 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 8. Head of Heteroclinus longicauda, showing canals (dashed lines) and pores (open circles) and position of dorsal fins; anterior and posterior nostril at end of short tubes elevated above skin, based largely on holotype.
PLATE 2 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
PLATE 2. Freshly collected specimens of Heteroclinus heptaeolus: A) AMS I.45633-069, 70mm SL female, Bendalong, New South Wales; B) AMS I.45025-046, 40 mm SL male, Mollymook, New South Wales; C) AMS I.21774-005, 86 mm SL female, Batemans Bay, New South Wales; D) AMS I.20095-054, female, not measured, Arrawarra, New South Wales.
FIGURE 4 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 4. Head of Heteroclinus colemani, showing canals (dashed lines) and pores (open circles) and position of dorsal fins; anterior and posterior nostril at end of short tubes elevated above skin, based largely on holotype.
FIGURE 16 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 16. Eye length as a percentage of standard length (y-axis) versus standard length in mm (x-axis) in Heteroclinus longicauda. The line indicates the predicted proportion from regression analysis showing decrease in proportion with increasing size.
FIGURE 6 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 6. Head of Heteroclinus heptaeolus, showing canals (dashed lines) and pores (open circles) and position of dorsal fins; anterior and posterior nostril at end of short tubes elevated above skin, composite based on several adult specimens.
PLATE 1 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
PLATE 1. High dorsal fin species: A) Freshly collected holotype of Heteroclinus colemani AMS I.20174-005, 47 mm SL female from Kangaroo Island, South Australia; B) Freshly collected paratype of Heteroclinus colemani, AMS I.24292-001, 37 mm SL female, from Sydney, New South Wales, photo by Rudie Kuiter; C) Heteroclinus wilsoni Neotype AMS I.20166-001, female 113 mm SL, Stokes Bay, Kangaroo Island; D) Heteroclinus wilsoni AMS I.19774-004, 1(100), Portsea Pier, Port Phillip, Victoria, photo by R. Kuiter.
FIGURE 2 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 2. Radiograph of skulls of species of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex, showing modification and position of pterygiophores and first 3 dorsal spines on skulls of various species.
FIGURE 1 in A review of the Heteroclinus heptaeolus complex (Pisces: Blennioidei: Clinidae), with three new species and discussion of use of proportions in taxonomic studies
FIGURE 1. Head of Heteroclinus argyrospilos from Hoese & Pogonoski (2021) showing canals (dashed lines) and pores (open circles) and position of dorsal fins; anterior and posterior nostril at end of short tubes elevated above skin. Letters indicate canal sections: a = nasal, b = supraorbital, c = postorbital, d = infraorbital, e = interorbital, f = preopercular, g = mandibular, h = occipital (median pore not shown), l = lateral line.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.