Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 2 in Revision of the crab genus Garthambrus Ng, 1996, with the description of two new genera and discussion of the status of Tutankhamen Rathbun, 1925 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Parthenopidae)

FIGURE 2. Selected figures illustrating the terminology used to describe regions, margins and teeth on the dorsal surface of the carapace of a generalised Garthambrus species: A, regions and teeth; B, carapace grooves and margins.

FIGURE 20 in Revision of the crab genus Garthambrus Ng, 1996, with the description of two new genera and discussion of the status of Tutankhamen Rathbun, 1925 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Parthenopidae)

FIGURE 20. Zarenkolambrus epibranchialis (Zarenkov, 1990): lectotype, M CL 5.0 mm, (after Zarenkov 1990: fig. 10). A, carapace; B, P1; C, P2; D, P3; E, P4; F, P5; G, abdomen; H, ventral view (no scale bar available).

FIGURE 19 in Revision of the crab genus Garthambrus Ng, 1996, with the description of two new genera and discussion of the status of Tutankhamen Rathbun, 1925 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Parthenopidae)

FIGURE 19. Zarenkolambrus minutus sp. nov.: holotype male 6.2 x 5.1 mm (MNHN), French Polynesia, Austral Is (Rae Vavae), SMCB, stn D66, 23°50.54'S, 147°42.73'W, 400 m, 3 Dec 1990.

FIGURE 15 in Revision of the crab genus Garthambrus Ng, 1996, with the description of two new genera and discussion of the status of Tutankhamen Rathbun, 1925 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Parthenopidae)

FIGURE 15. Garthambrus undulatus sp. nov.: holotype, male 44.4 x 29.0 mm (MNHN), New Caledonia, VOLSMAR, stn DW30, 22°17.0'S 171°17.7'E, 550 m, 5 Jun 1989. A, dorsal view; B, front view; C, side view

FIGURE 13 in Revision of the crab genus Garthambrus Ng, 1996, with the description of two new genera and discussion of the status of Tutankhamen Rathbun, 1925 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Parthenopidae)

FIGURE 13. Garthambrus posidon Ng, 1996: A, male 35.3 x 23.8 mm (MNHN), Madagascar, stn P3. —Garthambrus stellatus (Rathbun, 1906): B, holotype, male 48.6 x 32.8 mm (USNM 29839), Hawaiian Is, south coast, Oahu (after Ng & Tan 1999: fig. 1A).

FIGURE 6 in Revision of the crab genus Garthambrus Ng, 1996, with the description of two new genera and discussion of the status of Tutankhamen Rathbun, 1925 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Parthenopidae)

FIGURE 6. Gonopods. Garthambrus darthvaderi sp. nov.: A, B, holotype, male 19.9 x 14.0 mm (MNHN), New Caledonia, BIOCAL, stn DW44, 22°47'S, 167°14'E, 440–450 m, 30 Aug 1985. — Garthambrus lacunosus (Rathbun, 1906): C, D, holotype, male 30.9 x 21.8 mm (USNM 29842), Hawaiian Is, west coast of Hawaii, Kawaihae. — Garthambrus posidon Ng, 1996: E, F, male 35.3 x 23.8 mm (MNHN), Madagascar; A, C, left G1; B, D, left G2; E, right G1; F, right G2. Scale bar = 1 mm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2010View details →

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomic status of Andersen's fruit-eating bat (Artibeus jamaicensis aequatorialis) and revised classification of Artibeus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 2. Unrooted neighbor-joining phylogram based on 414 AFLP bands. Numbers along branches indicate bootstrap support values (top score) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (bottom score). Bold clade identifies specimens traditionally recognized as Artibeus jamaicensis aequatorialis.

opennotspecifiedDec 2010View details →

FIGURE 3 in Taxonomic status of Andersen's fruit-eating bat (Artibeus jamaicensis aequatorialis) and revised classification of Artibeus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 3. Map of the distribution of Artibeus aequatorialis. Star indicates the type locality of A. aequatorialis (Zaruma [3°40'60"S, 79°37'0"W], Ecuador). The distributional range is based on literature references (hollow squares; Andersen 1906 and Marques-Aguiar 2008) and specimens examined in the Species Account (star and solid squares). The northernmost (western Colombia; Valle del Cauca, Cali [3°26'14"N, 76°31'21"W], and Rio Raposo [3°43'0"N, 77°7'60"W]) and southernmost (western Peru; Tumbes, Faical [3°44'57"S, 80°45'2"W]) extent of A. aequatorialis remains to be defined. Shaded areas represent areas of the Andes Mountains higher than 1800 meters.

FIGURES 7–8. Female genitalia. 7 in Anacampsis rhoifructella (Clemens): clarification of its identity and larval biology, and differentiation from a similar species, Anacampsis consonella (Zeller), revised status (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

FIGURES 7–8. Female genitalia. 7, Anacampsis rhoifructella; 8, Anacampsis consonella. Each structure at same scale in Fig. 8 as in Fig. 7; B–E at same scale. A, overview, ventral aspect; B and C, segments 7 and 8, left lateral and dorsal aspects, respectively, showing posterior margin of tergite 8; D, base of ductus bursae (sternite 7 reflected caudad; scale patches removed in A. consonella); E, corpus bursae, left lateral aspect; F, detail of texture and microtrichia of wall of corpus bursae; G, signum.

FIGURE 4. Pupa, Anacampsis rhoifructella. A in Anacampsis rhoifructella (Clemens): clarification of its identity and larval biology, and differentiation from a similar species, Anacampsis consonella (Zeller), revised status (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

FIGURE 4. Pupa, Anacampsis rhoifructella. A, dorsal and ventral aspects; B, short, dense, hairlike vestiture of entire surface of pupa; C, texture of cuticle, as seen at junctions of abdominal segments 4/5, 5/6, and 6/7.

FIGURES 1–2. 1 in Anacampsis rhoifructella (Clemens): clarification of its identity and larval biology, and differentiation from a similar species, Anacampsis consonella (Zeller), revised status (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

FIGURES 1–2. 1, Anacampsis rhoifructella, and 2, A. consonella. A, adults, reared from Viburnum prunifolium, Illinois; B, larvae; C, larval feeding evidence; A rhoifructella on Viburnum prunifolium, Illinois, A. consonella on V. nudum var. crassinoides, Wisconsin. Photos in Figs. 2B and 2C by Ilona Loser; used with permission.

FIGURES 5–6. Male genitalia. 5 in Anacampsis rhoifructella (Clemens): clarification of its identity and larval biology, and differentiation from a similar species, Anacampsis consonella (Zeller), revised status (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

FIGURES 5–6. Male genitalia. 5, Anacampsis rhoifructella; 6, Anacampsis consonella. Each structure shown at same scale in Figure 6 as in Figure 5; A, B, D and F, left lateral aspect; C, E and G, ventral aspect. A, intact genitalia; B and C, valvae, vinculum and juxta (left valva removed in lateral aspect of A. rhoifructella); D and E, tegumen, gnathos and socii; F and G, phallus.

FIGURE 3. Larva, Anacampsis rhoifructella. A in Anacampsis rhoifructella (Clemens): clarification of its identity and larval biology, and differentiation from a similar species, Anacampsis consonella (Zeller), revised status (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

FIGURE 3. Larva, Anacampsis rhoifructella. A, head, frontal and left-lateral aspects; B, right mandible, medial aspect; C-H, chaetotaxy of body segments, left-lateral aspect, all at same scale; C, T1; D, T2-3; E, A1, 2, 7, 8, showing differences in the association of seta SD1 with the spiracle; F, A3-6; G, A9; H, A10.

FIGURE 5 in Revised taxonomic status of Eidophasia zukowskyi Amsel, 1938 (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) with first description of its male and female genitalia

FIGURE 5. Labial palpus of Eidophasia zukowskyi, 19–29.05.1955, Macedonia, Matka Treska Schlucht, J. Klimesch leg.

FIGURES 2–4. Eidophasia zukowskyi. 2 in Revised taxonomic status of Eidophasia zukowskyi Amsel, 1938 (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) with first description of its male and female genitalia

FIGURES 2–4. Eidophasia zukowskyi. 2. Habitus of the male, 19–29.05.1955, Macedonia, Matka Treska Schlucht, J. Klimesch leg., 3. Habitus of the female, 1 female, 19–29.05.1955, Macedonia, Matka Treska Schlucht, J. Klimesch leg. 4. The original black-white photo in Amsel (1940), Eidophasia zukowskyi female.

FIGURE 9 in Revised taxonomic status of Eidophasia zukowskyi Amsel, 1938 (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) with first description of its male and female genitalia

FIGURE 9. Female genitalia: Eidophasia zukowskyi: a—ventral view, c—antrum, e—ductus bursae near inception to bursa copulatrix, g—strengthened walls of bursa copulatrix, Eidophasia syenitella: b—ventral view, d—antrum, f—ductus bursae near inception to bursa copulatrix, h—strengthened walls of bursa copulatrix (the illustrations are following Baraniak & Sohn 2015: 588, Fig. 6a, c–e).

FIGURE 8 in Revised taxonomic status of Eidophasia zukowskyi Amsel, 1938 (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) with first description of its male and female genitalia

FIGURE 8. Male genitalia: Eidophasia zukowskyi: a—separated valva, c—sacculus, e—aedeagus; Eidophasia syenitella: bseparated valva, d—sacculus, f—aedeagus (the illustrations are following Baraniak & Sohn 2015: 587, Fig. 5b–d).

FIGURE 1 in Revised taxonomic status of Eidophasia zukowskyi Amsel, 1938 (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) with first description of its male and female genitalia

FIGURE 1. Eidophasia zukowskyi—neotype. Habitus of the male, Greece, Halkidiki, Stratoni, 100 m, 2–7.05.1994, P. Stadel Nielsen leg.

FIGURES 6–7. Eidophasia syenitella. 6 in Revised taxonomic status of Eidophasia zukowskyi Amsel, 1938 (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) with first description of its male and female genitalia

FIGURES 6–7. Eidophasia syenitella. 6. Habitus of the male, Malaga Prov.: Camino de Ojen (150 m): 1♂, 6 June1996, E. Traugott-Olsen leg. (the illustration is following Baraniak & Sohn 2015: 587, Fig. 1), 7. Habitus of the female, Sierra de Marbella: El. Mirandor (700 m): 1♀, 13 July 1990, E. Traugott-Olsen leg. (the illustration is following Baraniak & Sohn 2015: 587, Fig. 2).

FIGURES 7–9 in Revised status of Oridryas Meyrick, 1938: new synonyms of Ypsolopha Latreille, 1796, and Ypsolopha parenthesella (Linnaeus, 1761) (Yponomeutoidea: Ypsolophidae)

FIGURES 7–9. Genitalia of Ypsolopha (= Oridryas). 7. Male genitalia of Oridryas isalopex Meyrick, lectotype; 8. Male genitalia of Oridryas isalopex var. mienshanensis Caradja, paralectotype; 9. Female genitalia of O. isalopex, topotype.