Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2008View details →

Fig. 1 in Estimating Population Size And Distribution Of Hume'S Pheasant In Northern Thailand

Fig. 1. Study area is covered by two LANDSAT 7/ETM+ images, path 131/row 46 and path 131/row 47, which were acquired in Feb.2002.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in Assessing the distribution, roosting site characteristics, and population of Pteropus lylei in Thailand

Fig. 3. Roosting sites responded (total number: 34) according to responses from community-based questionnaire, and result of a field survey to validate survey data.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Assessing the distribution, roosting site characteristics, and population of Pteropus lylei in Thailand

Fig. 2. Pteropus lylei roosting sites and foraging zones; questionnaire respondents and bat hunting zones are marked in each sub-district.

Fig. 1 in Population dynamics of corallivores (Drupella and Acanthaster) on coral reefs of Koh Tao, a diving destination in the Gulf of Thailand

Fig. 1. Map of survey sites used in this study (after Hoeksema et al., 2012). Six of them were monitored for hard coral cover: Hin Wong Bay, Sairee, Sai Nuan, Chalok Ban Kao, Ao Leuk, and Tanote Bay. These sites and two additional ones (Mango Bay and Twin Rocks=Twins) were also used for predator studies.

Fig. 3 in Population dynamics of corallivores (Drupella and Acanthaster) on coral reefs of Koh Tao, a diving destination in the Gulf of Thailand

Fig. 3. Population dynamics of coral predators around Koh Tao in 2006–2014. a, Relative Drupella abundance showing significant variation over time (p=0.013). b, Mean Acanthaster abundance not varying significantly over time (p=0.189). c, Mean Drupella abundance is significantly higher in shallow quadrats as compared to deeper ones (p <0.001). d, Mean Acanthaster abundance shows no difference by depth (p=0.142). e, Mean Drupella abundance by site varied significantly (p <0.001). f, Mean Acanthaster abundance by site varied significantly p <0.001). g, Seasonal variability in Acanthaster abundance at EMP sites was not significant (p=0.641).

Fig. 5 in Population dynamics of corallivores (Drupella and Acanthaster) on coral reefs of Koh Tao, a diving destination in the Gulf of Thailand

Fig. 5. Coral predator abundance compared to previously published results on Koh Tao's reefs; differences are not significant. Drupella (a) and Acanthaster (b) abundance in low- and high-use sites as designated by Lamb et al. (2014). Similar for the designations as MPA or non-MPA sites used by Hein et al. (2014) concerning Drupella (c) and Acanthaster (d).

Fig. 4 in Population dynamics of corallivores (Drupella and Acanthaster) on coral reefs of Koh Tao, a diving destination in the Gulf of Thailand

Fig. 4. Positive linear correlation between Drupella abundance and live hard coral cover (R2=0.572, p <0.001).

Fig. 2 in Population dynamics of corallivores (Drupella and Acanthaster) on coral reefs of Koh Tao, a diving destination in the Gulf of Thailand

Fig. 2. Variation in mean hard coral cover at Koh Tao over the period 2006–2014 for the six selected sites indicated in Table 1.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in Assessing the population of grey peacock-pheasant (Polyplectron bicalcaratum) in a Southeast Asian conservation landscape

Fig. 2. Histograms of perpendicular distances of ungrouped grey peacock-pheasant detections and estimated detection functions derived from DISTANCE software for line transects: (A1) not truncated (A2) truncated by eye at 90 m

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Assessing the population of grey peacock-pheasant (Polyplectron bicalcaratum) in a Southeast Asian conservation landscape

Fig. 1. Location of line and point transect, listening posts for triangulation, and area searched for display scrapes to spot mapping, Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Uthai Thani,Thailand

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 4 in Assessing the population of grey peacock-pheasant (Polyplectron bicalcaratum) in a Southeast Asian conservation landscape

Fig. 4. The estimated density and standard error of Grey Peacockpheasant by four survey techniques in the 1200 × 1200 m study area at Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Uthai Thani, Thailand

Fig. 12 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 12. Locations of Cerberus schneiderii individuals with PIT tags: a, #680A445; b, #680A2C9; c, #680A377; and d, #680CAD9. Each position was based on the GPS coordinates recorded from each capture. Number denotes the month of capture (i.e., 1=Jan., 2=Feb., 3=Mar., etc.).

Fig. 11 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 11. Locations of Cerberus schneiderii individuals with PIT tags: a, #6899BFE; b, #6328212; c, #682D1CF; and d, #680C298. Each position was based on the GPS coordinates recorded from each capture. Number denotes the month of capture (i.e., 1=Jan., 2=Feb.,

Fig. 10 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 10. Cerberus schneiderii. Percentage frequency of displacement distance, which was calculated as the shortest distance between two locations that an individual was captured and recaptured.

Fig. 6 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 6. Cerberus schneiderii. Scatterplots and fitted regression lines of: a, body mass; b, tail length; and c, head width against snout-vent length (SVL) for males (O, solid line) and females (+, dashed line). Variables were log10-transformed.

Fig. 5 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 5. Percentage frequency distribution of snout-vent length (SVL) of Cerberus schneiderii for each month between Jan.–Oct.2006.

Fig. 9 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 9. Map showing the spatial distribution of Cerberus schneiderii in four brackish ponds ('A3-4', 'A6', 'C2-3' and 'C4-5') at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve. Each position was based on the GPS coordinates recorded for each snake captured (n = 2258).

Fig. 3 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 3. Percentage frequency distribution of the number of times that tagged individuals of Cerberus schneiderii were recaptured.

Fig. 2 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 2. Physical conditions (rainfall, air temperature) in relation to relative abundance of Cerberus schneiderii at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve between Jan.–Dec.2006: a, total rainfall and mean dry bulb temperature at the Changi Meteorological Station, Singapore; b, relative abundance of snakes represented by the relative number of individuals captured (i.e., # captures (# hours × # observers) –1) to standardise for sampling effort, which differed between months.

Fig. 1 in A Mark-Recapture Study Of A Dog-Faced Water Snake Cerberus Schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) Population In Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, Singapore

Fig. 1. Map of Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve showing the locations of the four brackish ponds (A3-4, A6, C2-3 and C4-5) where Cerberus schneiderii individuals were collected.