Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig 2 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 2 - The effects of egg separation on hatching patterns of Locusta migratoria eggs. The frequency distribution of hatching times for eggs kept in the pods (A) or in masses of 20 eggs (C) and those kept as separated eggs (B, D) when the mean hatching time was assumed to be 0 h. The relative times of hatching for the eggs kept in the pods (E) or in masses of 20 eggs (F) and those kept as separated eggs when the mean value for the former eggs was designated as 0 h. The number of hatched eggs followed by the number of tested pods in parentheses is given in each panel. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the two treatments (p < 0.05; t-test).

Figures 23-31 from: Massa B (2017) Revision of the tropical African genus Tetraconcha (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae) with the description of ten new species. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.21469

Figures 23-31 - Tetraconcha stichyrata male (Ivory Coast, Taï Nat. Park): 23. Stridulatory area; 24. Stridulatory file below the left tegmen; 25. Subgenital plate in ventral view. Tetraconcha banzyvilliana male (Cameroon): 26. Stridulatory area; 27. Stridulatory file below the left tegmen. Tetraconcha perezi sp. n. holotype male (Central African Republic, N'Doki): 28. Stridulatory area; 29. Stridulatory file below the left tegmen; 30. Subgenital plate in ventral view; 31. Cerci in dorsal view. Fig. 26 after Orthoptera Species File, Fig. 27 after Leroy (1970).

Figure 3 from: Watts C, Thornburrow D, Stringer I, Cave V (2017) Population expansion by Cook Strait giant wētā, Deinacrida rugosa (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae), following translocation to Matiu/Somes Island, New Zealand, and subsequent changes in abundance. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.21712

Figure 3 - Distribution of tracking tunnels with footprints of adult Deinacrida rugosa in 2008, 2013 and 2015. Cards were set over 3 nights in 2008 (Watts et al. (2009, 2011)) and over 4 nights in 2013 and 2015.

Fig 7 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 7 - The effect of the time of separation of Locusta migratoria eggs on the hatching time. The differences in mean hatching times between eggs separated and those kept in contact with each other (controls) are plotted against the time of egg separation gauged based on the mean hatching time for the control eggs (A). SDs of the mean hatching times are plotted against the time of egg separation gauged based on the mean hatching time for the control eggs kept in masses (B). Open and closed circles indicate eggs separated and those kept in masses, respectively. Each datum point is based on 16–20 eggs.

Fig 14 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 14 - The effects of pairing of Locusta migratoria eggs at different ages on hatching time. A. The mean hatching intervals between the first and second hatching eggs of the mixed pairs are plotted against the differences in mean hatching time between the younger and older controls in which two eggs were kept singly. B. The differences in hatching time between the first hatching eggs of the mixed pairs and older control eggs (from early-produced pods) are plotted against the difference in hatching time between the two control eggs. C. The differences in hatching time between the second hatching eggs of the mixed pairs and younger control eggs (from late-produced pods) are plotted against the difference in hatching time between the two controls. The diagrams on the top show combinations of eggs from older eggs (gray) and younger eggs (white). A total of 38 pairs of pods were used. Closed circles in (B) and (C) indicate the means significantly different from the controls (p < 0.05; Tukey's multiple test).

Figures 88-99 from: Massa B (2017) Revision of the tropical African genus Tetraconcha (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae) with the description of ten new species. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.21469

Figures 88-99 - Right habitus in lateral view of males of: 88. Tetraconcha smaragdina; 89. T. loubesi sp. n.; 90. T. morettoi sp. n.; 91. T. annoyeri sp. n.; 92. T. fijalkowskii sp. n.; 93. T. omonomai sp. n.; 94. T. ndokiensis sp. n.; 95. T. aristophanousi sp. n.; 96. T. perezi sp. n.; 97. T. danflousi sp. n.; 98. T. stichyrata; 99. T. ruzzieri sp. n..

Figure 2 from: Watts C, Thornburrow D, Stringer I, Cave V (2017) Population expansion by Cook Strait giant wētā, Deinacrida rugosa (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae), following translocation to Matiu/Somes Island, New Zealand, and subsequent changes in abundance. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.21712

Figure 2 - Locations where all adult Deinacrida rugosa were found in 2008, 2013, 2015 and 2016. Tracking tunnel transects are indicated as white lines. 2008 data from Watts et al. (2009, 2011).

Fig 11 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 11 - Hatching patterns of Locusta migratoria eggs derived from different pods and those from the same pods. As indicated above each triplet, the difference in the mean hatching times of the 2 pods (top and bottom panels) ranged from 3.6 to 80 h (A–D). In the mixed pairs (middle panel), the first and second hatchings are shown in black and light-colored bars. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences in mean values at the 5% level with Tukey's multiple test. The diagrams on the right of the figure show combinations of eggs from two pods expressed as white and black eggs, respectively.

Figures 49-64 from: Massa B (2017) Revision of the tropical African genus Tetraconcha (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae) with the description of ten new species. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.21469

Figures 49-64 - Tetraconcha annoyeri sp. n. holotype male (Central African Republic, N'Doki): 49. Stridulatory area; 50. Stridulatory file below the left tegmen; 51. Cerci and subgenital plate in dorsal view; 52. Cerci and subgenital plate in ventral view. Tetraconcha fijalkowskii sp. n. holotype male (Central African Republic, N'Doki): 53. Stridulatory area; 54. Stridulatory file below the left tegmen; 55. Cerci and subgenital plate in dorsal view; 56. Cerci and subgenital plate in ventral view. Tetraconcha omonomai sp. n. holotype male (Central African Republic, N'Doki): 57. Stridulatory area (the arrow shows the cubital areas); 58. Stridulatory file below the left tegmen; 59. Cerci and subgenital plate in dorsal view; 60. Cerci and subgenital plate in ventral view. Tetraconcha aristophanousi sp. n. holotype male (Ivory Coast, Taï Nat. Park): 61. Stridulatory area; 62. Stridulatory file below the left tegmen; 63. Cerci and subgenital plate in dorsal view; 64. Cerci and subgenital plate in ventral view.

Figures 79-87 from: Massa B (2017) Revision of the tropical African genus Tetraconcha (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae) with the description of ten new species. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.21469

Figures 79-87 - Left habitus in lateral view of females of: 79. Tetraconcha banzyvilliana; 80. T. stichyrata; 81. T. fenestrata; 82. T. longipes holotype female; 83. T. aristophanousi sp. n. paratype; 84. T. cf. smaragdina; 85. T. morettoi sp. n. Paratype; 86. Drepanophyllum marmoratum; 87. Debrona cervina.

Fig 10 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 10 - The effect of the time of pairing of Locusta migratoria separated eggs on the time of hatching. The differences in hatching time between the paired eggs and control eggs kept as separated eggs are plotted against the time of egg clumping gauged based on the mean hatching time for the control eggs (A). Comparison of SDs of the mean hatching times (B) and the intervals of hatching in each pair (C) for the clumped eggs (closed circles) and the control eggs (open circles). Each datum point is based on 18–24 eggs.

Fig 12 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 12 - The frequency distributions of hatching intervals for Locusta migratoria egg pairs derived from different (middle panel) and from the same pods (top and bottom panels). For explanation of the experimental design, see Fig. 11. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences in mean values at the 5% level with Steel-Dwass test. The diagrams on the right of the figure show combinations of eggs from two pods expressed as white and black eggs, respectively.

Fig 13 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 13 - Hatching patterns of Locusta migratoria eggs derived from different pods that were kept singly on day 10 and paired in contact with each other on day 12. Some eggs from the respective pods were singly kept as controls. Two pods laid on the same day (A) and different days (B) were used. In the mixed pairs (middle panel), the first and second hatchings are shown in black and light-colored bars. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences in mean values at the 5% level with Tukey's multiple test. The diagrams on the right of the figure show combinations of eggs from two pods expressed as white and black eggs, respectively. The frequency distributions of hatching intervals for the mixed pairs are shown (C and D).

Figures 65-66 from: Massa B (2017) Revision of the tropical African genus Tetraconcha (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae) with the description of ten new species. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.21469

Figures 65-66 - Tetraconcha aristophanousi: 65. Male, face in frontal view; 66. Female, face in frontal view.

Figures 8-9 from: Chiquetto-Machado PI, Albertoni FF (2017) Description of the female, egg and first instar nymph of the stick insect Paraphasma paulense (Phasmatodea: Pseudophasmatidae) from Southeast Brazil. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20180

Figures 8-9 - Paraphasma paulense Rehn, 1918 egg. SEM images: 8. Frontal view with operculum; 9. Detail of opercular socket and shell surface projections.

Fig 1 from: Tanaka S (2017) Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos monitor neighboring eggs for hatching synchrony. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20935

Fig 1 - Hatching patterns of L. migratoria eggs kept in the pods at 30°C under continuous illumination. Cumulative percentages of hatched eggs from 22 egg pods plotted against the time after the start of hatching for each pod (A). The frequency distribution of ranges from the beginning to end of hatching period from the respective pods (B).

Figures 24-28 from: Chiquetto-Machado PI, Albertoni FF (2017) Description of the female, egg and first instar nymph of the stick insect Paraphasma paulense (Phasmatodea: Pseudophasmatidae) from Southeast Brazil. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20180

Figures 24-28 - Paraphasma paulense Rehn, 1918 live specimens. 24, 25. First instar nymph, lateral and dorsal views; 26. Adult female resting; 27. Adult female after releasing the defensive substance, with secretion spread over the thorax; 28. Adult male after spraying the defensive substance backwards, with secretion accumulated on the tegmina spines and mesofemur.

Figures 19-23 from: Chiquetto-Machado PI, Albertoni FF (2017) Description of the female, egg and first instar nymph of the stick insect Paraphasma paulense (Phasmatodea: Pseudophasmatidae) from Southeast Brazil. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20180

Figures 19-23 - Paraphasma paulense Rehn, 1918 adult female. 19, 20. Habitus, dorsal and ventral views; 21. Head; 22, 23. End of abdomen, dorsal and ventral views.

Figures 1-7 from: Chiquetto-Machado PI, Albertoni FF (2017) Description of the female, egg and first instar nymph of the stick insect Paraphasma paulense (Phasmatodea: Pseudophasmatidae) from Southeast Brazil. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20180

Figures 1-7 - Paraphasma paulense Rehn, 1918 egg. 1–3. Lateral, dorsal and frontal (opercular) view, respectively; 4. Schematic illustration of internal micropylar plate; 5. Eggs detached from plastic container with pharate nymph inside; 6, 7. SEM of egg with open operculum; 6. Lateral view; 7. Dorsolateral view showing endochorion and internal face of operculum.

Figures 16-18 from: Chiquetto-Machado PI, Albertoni FF (2017) Description of the female, egg and first instar nymph of the stick insect Paraphasma paulense (Phasmatodea: Pseudophasmatidae) from Southeast Brazil. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.20180

Figures 16-18 - Paraphasma paulense Rehn, 1918 habitus of first instar nymph inside the egg. 16. Lateral view; 17. Dorsal view; 18. Ventral view.