Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,878
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,878 results for “Molecular Data”
Figure 21. A–D in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 21. A–D, Tegenaria femoralis; E–I, Tegenaria tyrrhenica; J-M, Tegenaria ferruginea; N-R, Tegenaria parietina. Left male palp in ventral (A, E, L, N) and retrolateral views (B, F, M, O); epigyne in ventral (C, G, J, P) and vulva in dorsal (D, H, K, Q), lateral (R), and anterior views (I). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Figure 11. A, B, G, H in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 11. A, B, G, H, Eratigena feminea; C–F, I–P, Eratigena bucculenta s.l. Left male palp in ventral (A, C, E) and retrolateral views (B, D, F); epigyne in ventral (G, I, K, N) and posterior views (O); vulva in ventral (J, L) and dorsal views (H, M, P). Scale bars = 0.5 mm (scale for I is missing).
Figure 23. A–D in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 23. A–D, Tegenaria tridentina; E-H, Tegenaria mirifica; I, J, Tegenaria levantina; K-W, Tegenaria pagana, including the type specimens of Tegenaria cerrutii (R, S), Tegenaria marinae (T, U), and Tegenaria baronii (V, W). Left male palp in ventral (A, E, K) and retrolateral views (B, F, L); epigyne in ventral (C, G, I, P, R, T, V) and vulva in dorsal view (D, H, J, Q, S, U, W); chelicerae in ventral view (O); face of female in frontal (N) and sternum in ventral view (M). Scale bars = 0.5 mm (T–W without scale).
Figure 8. A, B in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 8. A, B, Eratigena atrica; C-F, Eratigena agrestis; G-I, Eratigena fuesslini; J, K, P, Q, Eratigena feminea; L–O, R, S, Eratigena bucculenta s.l. Left male palp in ventral (A, C, G, J, L, N) and retrolateral views (B, D, H, I, K, M, O); epigyne in ventral view (E, P, R); vulva in dorsal view (F, Q, S).
Figure 10. A–G in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 10. A–G, Eratigena atrica; H–K, Eratigena fuesslini; L-O, Eratigena montigena. Female intraspecific morphological variation (A–F); the extremes correspond to the following taxa recognized by some authors: Eratigena atrica (A, D), Eratigena saeva (B, E), and Eratigena duellica (C, F). Epigyne in ventral view [A–C with 'pseudo teeth' (white arrows), J, M]; vulva, dorsal view (D–F, K, N); left male palp in ventral (H, L) and retrolateral views (I, O); male tibia in dorsal view (G) with short dorsal spike (white arrow). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Figure 19. A–I in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 19. A–I, Tegenaria silvestris, variation in males and females (B, C, F–I); J, K, Tegenaria vankeerorum sp. nov.; L, M, Tegenaria pindosiensis sp. nov.; N, O, Tegenaria croatica sp. nov. Left male palp in ventral (A, K) and retrolateral views (B, C, J), with detailed drawing of variation of the terminal end of conductor (TEC); epigyne in ventral (D, L) and vulva in dorsal (E, F, H, M, O), ventral (N), and lateral views (G, I). Abbreviations: CD, copulatory duct; CO, copulatory opening; FD, fertilization duct; MA, median apophysis; RC, receptaculum.
Figure 7 in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 7. Combined DNA and morphological data (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase subunit 1, 28S, and morphological data) Bayesian tree. Posterior probabilities of clades are expressed in percentages and given above branches. Clade support (> 50) from the resampling method (jack-knife, 1000 replications) based on parsimony analysis with implied weighting (K = 10) is given below the branches. Bremer support (> 4) is given to the right of the corresponding node. Abbreviations: AT, Austria; CH, Switzerland; DE, Germany; ES, Spain; FR, France; GR, Greece; IT, Italy; PT, Portugal; SE, Sweden; US, United States.
Figure 25 in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 25. Collection sites of Tegenaria regispyrrhi s.l. Triangles, Tegenaria regispyrrhi Brignoli, 1976; square, Tegenaria aff. regispyrrhi (1); circle, Tegenaria aff. regispyrrhi (2); stars, Tegenaria aff. regispyrrhi (3). Digital map provided by http://histgeo.ac-aix-marseille.fr.
Figure 9 in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 9. Eratigena agrestis (A–H) and Eratigena atrica (I–O). Male intraspecific morphological variation (I–O); the extremes correspond to the following taxa recognized by some authors: Eratigena atrica (J, M), Eratigena saeva (K, N) and Eratigena duellica (L, O). Left male palp in ventral (A, J–L) and retrolateral views (B, M–O); epigyne in ventral view (D, white arrow pointing to an epigynal tooth) and vulva in dorsal view (E); variation of epigyne in ventral (G) and vulva in dorsal views (H); sternum in ventral view (C); spinnerets in ventral view (F, I). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Figure 24. A–D in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 24. A–D, Tegenaria regispyrrhi; E, F, Tegenaria aff. regispyrrhi 1; G, H, Tegenaria aff. regispyrrhi 2; I, J, Tegenaria aff. regispyrrhi 3; K-P, Tegenaria vankeerorum sp. nov. Left male palp in ventral (C, K) and retrolateral views (D, L); retrolateral tibial apophysis of left male palp in dorsal view (M); female epigyne in ventral (A, E, G, I) and vulva in dorsal view (B, F, H, J); face in frontal view (N); sternum (O) and spinnerets (P) in ventral view. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Figure 16. A, B in Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data
Figure 16. A, B, Tegenaria montiszasensis sp. nov.; C, D, L-N, Tegenaria ariadnae; E-K, Tegenaria annae sp. nov.; O-R, Tegenaria carensis; S-V, Tegenaria ramblae; and W, X, Tegenaria domestica. Left male palp in ventral (I, L, O, S, W) and retrolateral views (J, M, P, T, X); RTA in retrolateral view (K); epigyne in ventral (A, C, E, Q, U) and vulva in dorsal view (B, D, F, R, V); carapace (H) and abdomen (G) in dorsal view; face of male in frontal view (N). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
FIGURE 3 in Exploring character conflict in molecular data*
FIGURE 3. Likelihood mapping results for three hypothetical data sets. Each corner of the triangle represents a different phylogenetic hypothesis for the arrangement of four taxa. Figures represent the percentage of dots in each part of the triangle, where dots represent quartets of sequences sampled from an alignment of DNA sequences. In (a) most points cluster in all three corners; in the general approach to likelihood mapping this would represent a dataset with strong phylogenetic signal, in the context of testing a specific hypothesis it would represent a data set in which the results depend on which taxa are sampled from each group. In (b) most points cluster in the middle; in either approach this would represent a data set with little or no phylogenetic signal. In (c) most points cluster in one corner (lower left); this would represent a strong and consistent phylogenetic signal in favour of one particular hypothesis.
FIGURE 2. A phylogenetic network for a hypothetical data set. This network represents the relationships between four taxa, A-D in Exploring character conflict in molecular data*
FIGURE 2. A phylogenetic network for a hypothetical data set. This network represents the relationships between four taxa, A-D. The length of branch (a) is proportional to the strength of support for the relationship (A,C)(B,D). The length of branch (b) is proportional to the strength of support for the relationship (A,B)(C,D). In this example there is conflicting support for both of these arrangements, but more weight is given to (A,C)(B,D) than to (A,B)(C,D).
FIGURE 2 in The systematics of Boulengerula fischeri (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) based on morphological and molecular data
FIGURE 2. Habitat along path within Cyamudongo Forest Reserve where Boulengerula fischeri were found during visual encounter surveys of the leaf litter.
FIGURE 1 in The systematics of Boulengerula fischeri (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) based on morphological and molecular data
FIGURE 1. Map showing position of six sampling localities in Cyamudongo and Nyungwe Forests, Rwanda.
FIGURE 4 in The systematics of Boulengerula fischeri (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) based on morphological and molecular data
FIGURE 4. Best trees from ML analysis of mt (12S, 16S, cytb, cox1) and nuclear (RAG1) DNA sequences. Third codon positions for mt protein-coding genes (cytb, cox1) excluded, and data partitioned by gene and codon position. a) with four outgroups. b) with Herpele squalostoma as a single outgroup.
Figure 2 in Morphological and molecular data confirm species assignment and dispersal of the genus Ligia (Crustacea: Isopoda: Ligiidae) along northeastern coastal China and East Asia
Figure 2. Morphological characters of Ligia cinerascens and Ligia exotica. (I–III) Morphological traits of eyes (I), second antenna (II) and second antenna flagellum segments (III) of L. cinerascens in dorsal view. (IV, V) Morphological traits of the telson of L. cinerascens (IV) and L. exotica (V) in dorsal view and scanning electron microscopy images of partial enlarged spines on the pad of appendix masculina, showing terms used in the Results section: IAP, inner accessory processes; MDP, median process; PLP, posterolateral processes. (VI, VII) Morphological traits of appendix masculina of left second pleopod of L. cinerascens (VI) and L. exotica (VII) in ventral view, showing terms used in the Results section: IL, inner lateral; P, pad; PMP, posterior margin of pad; T, tip.
Figure 2 in Molecular data reveal cryptic lineages within the northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean small mussel drills of the Ocinebrina edwardsii complex (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Muricidae)
Figure 2. Histogram of the frequency of Kimura twoparameter (K2P) genetic divergence in all pairwise comparisons of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences.
Figure 4 in Molecular data reveal cryptic lineages within the northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean small mussel drills of the Ocinebrina edwardsii complex (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Muricidae)
Figure 4. Same tree as in Figure 3 obtained by BEAST on the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) alignment, and distribution maps of the vouchers, grouped in the clades resulting from the COI analysis.
Figure 3 in Molecular data reveal cryptic lineages within the northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean small mussel drills of the Ocinebrina edwardsii complex (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Muricidae)
Figure 3. Consensus tree of a final sample of 104 trees obtained by BEAST on the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) alignment. The black bars on the right delimit the Molecular Operational Taxonolllmic Units (MOTUs) as defined by the three species delimitation methods employed [Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD), Generalized Mixed Yule- Coalescent (GMYC) and TCS]. Posterior supports> 0.95 are reported, and only for the nodes subtending the MOTUs. Voucher shells for each MOTU are figured (shells not to scale). 3A, MOTUs A–C; 3B, MOTUs D1–H.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.