Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,401
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,401 results for “Subterranean”
Figure 4 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 4 - Niphargus molnari, scanning electron micrographs. A epimeral plates (Ep1-3 = epimeral plates 1-3) B honeybee-cell pattern on the exosceleton (tipical feature of amphipods) C pleopod with two retinacles (pl-r = pleopod ramus, ret = retinaculum) D retinaculi on the pleopod (ret = retinaculum) E gnathopod II propodus (prop = propodus, sup-spine = supporting spine, dact = dactylus) F palmar region of gnathopod II propodus (dent-spine = denticulated spine, sup-spine = supporting spine, n = nail, palm-spine = palmar spine).
Figure 3 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 3 - Niphargus molnari, male from the Abaligeti Cave, lateral view. Telson, mouthparts and pleopods II-III are not drawn.
Figure 16 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 16 - Niphargus gebhardti, t: telson, upI: uropod I, upII: uropod II, upIII-m: male's uropod III, upIII-f: female's uropod III.
Figure 2 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 2 - Distribution of the two species within the Abaligeti Cave. 1 Niphargus molnari along the stream of the Western 2. collateral 2 Niphargus gebhardti in a permanent pool of 'Karthago romjai' 3 Niphargus gebhardti in a permanent pool near the Akácos Sinkhole's entrance.
Figure 12 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 12 - Niphargus gebhardti, aI = antenna I, aII = antenna II, mxI = maxilla I, mxII = maxilla II, md-R = right mandibula, inc = incisor, lm = lacinia mobilis, md-L = left mandibula, lb = labium, mxpe = maxilliped.
Figure 17 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 17 - Bayesian phylogenetic tree of 104 amphipod taxa (including Niphargus molnari and Niphargus gebhardti) based on COI, 28S and histone (H3) sequences. Map represents distribution of the clade with Niphargus gebharti. Squeres represent epikarstic species and circles species from other subterranean habitats.
Figure 5 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 5 - Non-metric multidimensional scaling (Jaccard index) using presence and absence of species sampled in 55 limestone caves of the Brazilian Savannah. The figure shows that the cave, despite dry most of the year, is subject to seasonal flooding (Deus Me Livre cave), and then was more similar to caves with streams.
Figure 19 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 19 - Small pool formed by dripping water, one of the occupied microhabitats of Niphargus gebhardti in the Trió Cave.
Figure 4 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 4 - Correlation between the richness of troglomorphic species and linear development and water body presence/absence. The barr represents the average and the trace the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences in average richness.
Figure 3 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 3 - Correlation between total richness and width of entrances, linear development and water body presence/absence. The barr represents the average and the trace the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences in average richness.
Figure 1 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 1 - Cave distribution at Minas Gerais state, Brazil (black triangle), where terrestrial invertebrates were sampled.
Figure 11 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 11 - Niphargus gebhardti, scanning electron micrographs. A epimeral plates with uropods (Ep1–3 = epimeral plates 1–3, upI = uropod I, upII = uropod II, upIII-f = female's uropod III) B epimeral plates (Ep1–3 = epimeral plates 1–3) C telson (t = telson, pl-seta = plumose seta) D pleopods (plp = pleopod) E aesthetasc on antenna I (aest = aesthetasc) F pereopod VI dactylus (sl-seta = spine-like seta at the base of the nail, pl-seta = plumose seta).
Figure 10 from: Angyal D, Balázs G, Zakšek V, Krízsik V, Fišer C (2015) Redescription of two subterranean amphipods Niphargus molnari Méhely, 1927 and Niphargus gebhardti Schellenberg, 1934 (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) and their phylogenetic position. ZooKeys 509: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.509.9820
Figure 10 - Niphargus gebhardti, female from the Abaligeti Cave, lateral view. Mouthparts, rami of pleopods and telson are not drawn.
Figure 1 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 1 - Distribution of 15 caves in the Atlantic Forest in the state of Espírito Santo, with invertebrate fauna inventoried in this study. Source: SOS Mata Atlântica (2011).
Figure 8 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 8 - Human alterations in caves of Espírito Santo, Brazil. A religious use in granite cave in Venda Nova dos Imigrantes B transformation of granitic cave into a church in Itaimbé-Itaguassu C deforestation surrounding cave in Ecoporanga, D drainage exploitation in granite cave near Pedro Canário E use of cave as goat corral F road construction destroying cave chambers in Vargem Alta G and I Limoeiro cave entrance with religious and tourist use in Conceição de Castelo H using limestone cave as a timber-yard in Vargem Alta.
Figure 7 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 7 - Almost significant differences between the diversity and total and relative richness of invertebrates in caves that develop in carbonate rocks and magma in the state of Espírito Santo. Average, ± SE, ± SD.
Figure 3 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 3 - Some of the troglomorphic invertebrates sampled in 15 caves in Atlantic forest at Espírito Santo state, Brazil. A Escadabiidae, B Trachelipodidae, C Pseudonannolene sp., D Cryptodesmidae, E Trichopolidesmydae, F Zygentoma, G Trichorhina sp.
Figure 2 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 2 - Composition and richness of invertebrate taxa collected in 15 caves in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Figure 6 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 6 - A Significant relationship of the increased richness of collected invertebrates with the increase in size of caves in limestone and granitic rocks and B no significant relationship without limestone caves in the state of Espírito Santo.
Figure 9 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 9 - A Distribution of cave biological relevance B cave impacts category and C cave fauna vulnerability in the state of Espírito Santo. Gray shading on maps represents remnants of the Atlantic Forest.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.