Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,401
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,401 results for “Subterranean”
Figure 7 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
Figure 7 - Diversity of described families across different lithologies in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 7 the total number of described families is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the x-axis.
Figure 6 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
Figure 6 - Diversity of described families in different IBRA subregions in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 6 the total number of described families is indicated by numerical figures located to the right of the bars and the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located along the y-axis.
Figure 9 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
Figure 9 - Comparison of systemic composition of described families from Australia and the World Average; In Figure 9 the systemic composition of described stygofauna families is compared between the Pilbara region (Western Australia, Australia) derived from Eberhard et al. (2005), Queensland (Australia), and the World Average derived from Eberhard et al. (2005).
Figure 3 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
Figure 3 - Distribution of stygofauna sampling effort by lithology in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 3 the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns and the percentage of samples is indicated by numerical figures along the x-axis.
Figure 2 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
Figure 2 - Outline map of Queensland, Australia highlighting the location of stygofauna sampling sites and other localities; In Figure 2 an outline map shows the location of all 582 stygofauna sampling sites and other key localities mentioned in the text (e.g. Bowen Basin, Murray–Darling Basin, Proserpine–Sarina Lowlands IBRA region).
Figure 6 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298
Figure 6 - Human population density (2010 U.S. Census from the U.S. Census Bureau) by county with ranges for the eight Bactrurus species. For Bactrurus brachycaudus, Bactrurus hubrichti, and Bactrurus mucronatus, the range boundary has been interpreted as in Fig. 5.
Figure 1 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298
Figure 1 - Distribution of species of the genus Bactrurus (Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae) in relation to karst. Karst areas are based on Weary and Doctor (2014). Letters A–F (red arrows) are localities discussed in the body of the text.
Figure 5 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298
Figure 5 - Species ranges for the genus Bactrurus (Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae) in relation to pre-Pleistocene rivers of the mid-western United States. Shaded areas with thin dashed lines represent species ranges. For Bactrurus brachycaudus, Bactrurus hubrichti and Bactrurus mucronatus, the range boundary has been interpreted in light of these rivers. Heavy dashed line is maximum extent of Pleistocene glaciation.
Figure 4 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298
Figure 4 - Groundwater amphipod relationships modified after the maximum clade credibility diagram of Corrigan et al. (2014) with 95% highest posterior density intervals shown as gray bars, and with additional details of geological timeline following Cohen et al. (2013).
Figure 3 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298
Figure 3 - Land use within the ranges of the eight species of the genus Bactrurus. Based on the National Land Cover Database (Homer et al. 2015), collapsed into six categories (see Methods).
Figure 2 from: Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterranean Biology 17: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7298
Figure 2 - Distribution of species of the genus Bactrurus (Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae), overlain on a map of the maximum extent of Pleistocene glacial episodes derived from Fullerton et al. (2003). Letters A–F (red arrows) are localities discussed in the body of the text.
Figure 9 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 9 - Habitus of Tianeotrechus trisetosus Tian & Tang, gen. n., sp. n., holotype, male Scale bar: 2.0 mm, A enlarged right mandible to show the quadrisetose teeth
Figure 8 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 8 - Cave Dashi Dong, type locality of Dianotrechus gueorguievi Tian, gen. n., sp. n. A entrance, outside view B entrance, inside view C main passage.
Figure 7 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 7 - Habitus of Dianotrechus gueorguievi Tian, gen. n., sp. n., holotype, female Scale bar: 2.0 mm.
Figure 5 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 5 - Distribution of the trechine beetles a Dianotrechus gueorguievi Tian, gen. n., sp. n. b Shenaphaenops humeralis Uéno, 1999 c Shiqianaphaenops majusculus (Uéno, 1999), comb. n. d Tianeotrechus trisetosus Tian & Tang, gen. n., sp. n. e Huoyanodytes tujiaphilus Tian & Huang, sp. n. f Wanhuaphaenops zhangi Tian & Wang, gen. n., sp. n.
Figure 4 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 4 - Male genitalia A and C median lobe, lateral view B and D apical lobe, dorsal view A and B Shiqianaphaenops majusculus (Uéno, 1999), comb. n. C and D Shenaphaenops humeralis Uéno, 1999.
Figure 3 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 3 - Elytral chaetotaxy A Shiqianaphaenops majusculus (Uéno, 1999), comb. n. B Shenaphaenops humeralis Uéno, 1999 C Dianotrechus gueorguievi Tian, gen. n., sp. n. D Tianeotrechus trisetosus Tian & Tang, gen. n., sp. n. E Huoyanodytes tujiaphilus Tian & Huang, gen. n., n. sp. F Huoyanodytes tujiaphilus Tian & Huang, gen. n., sp. n. G Wanhuaphaenops zhangi Tian & Wang, sp. n.
Figure 14 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 14 - Habitus of Wanhuaphaenops zhangi Tian & Wang, gen. n., sp. n., holotype, male. Scale bar: 2.0 mm.
Figure 6 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 6 - Cave Feng Dong, type locality of Shiqianaphaenops majusculus (Uéno, 1999), comb. n. A entrance B cave chamber, to show where the beetles were collected C a wandering individual in cave.
Figure 15 from: Tian M, Huang S, Wang X, Tang M (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of subterranean trechine beetles in southern China's karsts: five new genera (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 564: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6819
Figure 15 - Cave Songjia Dong, type locality of Wanhuaphaenops zhangi Tian & Wang, gen. n., sp. n. A entrance B a wandering individual of Wanhuaphaenops zhangi C a platynine Colpodes beetle in the cave.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.