Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Temporal variation in the behavior of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Lycastrirhyncha nitens (Diptera: Syrphidae) on Pontederia sagittata (Commelinales: Pontederiaceae) inflorescences in relation to nectar availability

Fig. 4. Mean (± 95 % CI) standing crop of floral nectar on inflorescences of three floral morphs of Pontederia sagittata during daily periods of video-recording.

Fig. 3 in Temporal variation in the behavior of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Lycastrirhyncha nitens (Diptera: Syrphidae) on Pontederia sagittata (Commelinales: Pontederiaceae) inflorescences in relation to nectar availability

Fig. 3. Mean (± 95 % CI) number and duration of the foraging events recorded by Apis mellifera (A, B) and Lycastrirhyncha nitens (C, D) on inflorescences of L (black circle), M (gray circle) and S (white circle) morphs of Pontederia sagittata during daily periods of video-recording.

Figs. 2–8 in Speccafrons (Diptera: Chloropidae: Oscinellinae) newly found in mainland China with description of a new species

Figs. 2–8. Speccafrons digitiformis sp. nov. 2–5. Male. (2) Epandrium, posterior view; (3) Epandrium, lateral view; (4) Hypandrium and phallic complex, ventral view; and (5) Hypandrium and phallic complex, lateral view. 6–8. Female. (6) Abdominal terminalia, dorsal view; (7) Abdominal terminalia, lateral view; and (8) Abdominal terminalia, ventral view. Scale bar = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Temporal variation in the behavior of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Lycastrirhyncha nitens (Diptera: Syrphidae) on Pontederia sagittata (Commelinales: Pontederiaceae) inflorescences in relation to nectar availability

Fig. 2. Total activity time (± 95 % CI) of Apis mellifera and Lycastrirhyncha nites on inflorescences of L (black circle), M (gray circle) and S (white circle) morphs of Pontederia sagittata during daily periods of video-recording.

Fig. 1 in Temporal variation in the behavior of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Lycastrirhyncha nitens (Diptera: Syrphidae) on Pontederia sagittata (Commelinales: Pontederiaceae) inflorescences in relation to nectar availability

Fig. 1. Position of styles and stamens and differences in pollen size in the three floral morphs of Pontederia sp. a) long-styled [L], b) mid-styled [M] and c) shortstyled [S] (Zomlefer 1994). Legitimate pollinations are indicated by arrows.

Fig. 1 in Discovery and successful development of Cuterebra americana (Diptera: Oestridae) from an atypical host, Rattus rattus (Rodentia: Muridae), in Florida, U.S.A.

Fig. 1. Puparium of Cuterebra americana (Fabricius), A) puparium in profile, 24 × 13 × 12 mm l × w × h; B) extruded, yellow, elliptical anterior spiracles with subtri- angular operculum on the tergum of segments 1 to 3; C) spines on surface of puparium; and D) magnified plate-like, multi-pointed spines. This figure is displayed in color in the online version of this article.

Fig. 1 in A new species of the genus Forcipomyia (Lepidohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in China

Fig. 1. Forcipomyia (Lepidohelea) qinlingensis sp. nov., male; A: antenna; B: palpus; C: legs; D: wing; E: aedeagus; F: hypopygium, ventral view.

Figs. 1–5 in New record of Horaia (Diptera: Blephariceridae) in China with descriptions of two new species

Figs. 1–5. Horaia xizangana sp. nov. (male). 1. Habitus of male, lateral view; 2. Head; 3. Wing; 4. Male Genitalia, dorsal view; 5. Male Genitalia, ventral view. Abbreviations: c = cercus; ep = epandrium; gl = gonocoxal lobe; gs = gonostylus; gx = gonocoxite; hyd = hypandrium; pa = parameres. Scale bar: 1, 3 = 1 mm; 2, 4–5 = 0.25 mm.

Fig. 2 in Evaluation of field dispersal and survival capacity of the genetic sexing strain Tapachula-7 of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 2. General displacement of Anastrepha ludens SMR strain (solid line) and Tap-7 strain (broken line) in a Cartesian plane.

Fig. 5 in Female remating inhibition and fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) associated with male accessory glands

Fig. 5. Fecundities of Bactrocera dorsalis females of various mating statuses. A. Lifetime mean number (± S.E.) of eggs laid per female, and B. Mean oviposition rates per week of Bactrocera dorsalis females of various mating statuses. G1, virgin females housed alone (n = 30); G2, females mated once (n = 26); G3, females mated twice with different virgin males (n = 32); G4, females mated with males that had mated on the previous day (n = 29); G5, females housed with males at a sex ratio of 1: 1 (n = 23); G6, females housed with males at a sex ratio of 1♀: 23 (n = 24). Different letters indicate significant differences.

Fig. 2 in Morphometry of compound eyes of three Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) species

Fig. 2. SEM micrographs of the compound eye of 3 Bactrocera species showing the shapes of the ommatidia (square and hexagonal), central region (A, C, E) and dorsal region (B, D, F). Scale bar = 20 µm A, B: B. cucurbitae C, D: B. tau E, F: B. dorsalis.

Fig. 1 in Female remating inhibition and fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) associated with male accessory glands

Fig. 1. Male accessory glands of Bactrocera dorsalis. One pair of long tube mesodermal accessory glands (MAG) and 3 pairs of long, convoluted, complex and fragile ectodermal accessory glands (EAG).

Fig. 1 in Morphometry of compound eyes of three Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae) species

Fig. 1. Light micrographs of the compound eyes of the 3 Bactrocera species. Scale bar = 100 µm. A: Female B. cucurbitae B: Male B. cucurbitae C: Female B. tau D: Male B. tau E: Female B. dorsalis F: Male B. dorsalis.

Fig. 6 in Female remating inhibition and fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) associated with male accessory glands

Fig. 6. Fertilities of Bactrocera dorsalis females of various mating statuses. A. Lifetime mean percent hatch of eggs laid by females of G2 – G6 mating statuses, B. Mean percent hatch of eggs laid each week by females of G2 – G6 mating statuses. G2, females mated once (n = 18); G3, females mated twice with virgin males (n= 20); G4, females mated with non-virgin males (n = 18); G5, females housed with males with a sex ratio of 1: 1 (n = 18); G6, females housed with males with a sex ratio of 1♀: 23 (n = 19). Data for the unfertilized eggs laid by virgin females in group G1 and for females that produced fewer than 5 eggs in total were not analyzed. Different letters indicate significant differences.

Fig. 3 in Female remating inhibition and fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) associated with male accessory glands

Fig. 3. Mean percentage of successful matings among Bactrocera dorsalis of different mating statuses. M1, matings of 8-day old virgin females with of 8-day old virgin males on day 1; M2, matings of 9-day old virgin females with 9-day old virgin males on day 2; M3, matings of 10-day old virgin females with 10-day old males on day 3; M4, matings on day 2 of virgin females with males that had mated on day 1; M5, both first and second matings with virgin males; M6, first mating to non-virgin male and remating to virgin male. Different letters indicate significantly different proportions.

Fig. 1 in Toxicities and residual effects of toxic baits containing spinosad or malathion to control the adult Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 1. The mortality of Anastrepha fraterculus adult afer 1, 3, 5 and 7 days of exposure to toxic baits. (Vertical bars indicate the standard error of the mean). Mortality was calculated by the formula of Schneider-Orelli (1947).

Fig. 1 in Evaluation of field dispersal and survival capacity of the genetic sexing strain Tapachula-7 of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 1. Contours of displacement of the SMR strain (lef) and Tap-7 strain (right) of Anastrepha ludens inside the field plot. The density of the flies at each contour is indicated by the number.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in Survey for spotted-wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the five-county nursery production region of middle Tennessee, USA

Fig. 1. Average trap captures of Drosophila suzukii males (gray triangles) and females (black circles) by week in 2013 and 2014. Weeks with an asterisk above them indicate significant differences (P <0.05) between the sexes by pair-wise LSMeans comparison in the negative binomial regression analysis (PROC GENMOD).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Survey for spotted-wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the five-county nursery production region of middle Tennessee, USA

Fig. 2. Average trap captures of Drosophila suzukii in red (black circles) and yellow traps (gray triangles) by week in 2013 and 2014. No significant differences (P> 0.05) were found between the colors by pair-wise LSMeans comparison in the negative binomial regression analysis (PROC GENMOD).