Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
275
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
275 results for “Form 1”
Figure 1 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 1. Cosmochthonius ponticus, adult, dorsal aspect. Note: explanation of labels in text.
EXPLICATION DE LA PLANCHE XVI Learchis indica Bgh. Fig. 1. Mandibule droite, dessinée à la chambre claire, vue du côté interne. X 100. a, partie cardinale. b, prolongement masticateur. c, cavité buccale latérale. Fig. 2. Bord antérieur de la mandibule gauche, vue du côté interne. Cam. lue, X 200. a et b, comme ci-dessus. Fig. 3. Partie de la radule avec plaques dentaires. Cam. lue, X 350. Fig. 4. La même, vue d'en haut. Même grossissement. Mijja longicornis Bgh. Fig. 5. Animal vu du côté dorsal. (Dessin original d'après l'animal vivant.) Fig. 6. Extrémité d'une papille dorsale. (Dessin original.) Fig. 7. Papille. Cam. lue, X 55. a, grande papille avec deux follicules hépatiques. Fig. 8. Anus, en forme de coupe; b, ouverture du rein. Fig. 9. Cnidae. Cam. lue, X350. Fig. 10. Système nerveux central, vu d'en haut et de derrière. Cam. lue, X 200. a, ganglions cérébro-pleuraux. b, ganglions pédieux. ce, ganglions rhinophoriaux (olfactifs). d, ganglions buccaux (et gastro-oesophagiens) Fig'. 11. Langue avec la radule, vue de côté. Cam. lue, X 350. Fig. 12. Une partie de la radule. Cam. lue, X 350. Fig. 13. Plaque dentaire, vue d'en haut. Cam. lue, X 350. Ennoia briareus Bgh. Fig. 14. L'animal vu du côté dorsal. (Dessin original d'après l'animal vivant.) Fig. 15. Partie de la radule avec plaques dent aires, vue de côté. Cam. lue, X350. in Eolidiens d'Amboine
EXPLICATION DE LA PLANCHE XVI Learchis indica Bgh. Fig. 1. Mandibule droite, dessinée à la chambre claire, vue du côté interne. X 100. a, partie cardinale. b, prolongement masticateur. c, cavité buccale latérale. Fig. 2. Bord antérieur de la mandibule gauche, vue du côté interne. Cam. lue, X 200. a et b, comme ci-dessus. Fig. 3. Partie de la radule avec plaques dentaires. Cam. lue, X 350. Fig. 4. La même, vue d'en haut. Même grossissement. Mijja longicornis Bgh. Fig. 5. Animal vu du côté dorsal. (Dessin original d'après l'animal vivant.) Fig. 6. Extrémité d'une papille dorsale. (Dessin original.) Fig. 7. Papille. Cam. lue, X 55. a, grande papille avec deux follicules hépatiques. Fig. 8. Anus, en forme de coupe; b, ouverture du rein. Fig. 9. Cnidae. Cam. lue, X350. Fig. 10. Système nerveux central, vu d'en haut et de derrière. Cam. lue, X 200. a, ganglions cérébro-pleuraux. b, ganglions pédieux. ce, ganglions rhinophoriaux (olfactifs). d, ganglions buccaux (et gastro-oesophagiens) Fig'. 11. Langue avec la radule, vue de côté. Cam. lue, X 350. Fig. 12. Une partie de la radule. Cam. lue, X 350. Fig. 13. Plaque dentaire, vue d'en haut. Cam. lue, X 350. Ennoia briareus Bgh. Fig. 14. L'animal vu du côté dorsal. (Dessin original d'après l'animal vivant.) Fig. 15. Partie de la radule avec plaques dent aires, vue de côté. Cam. lue, X350.
Figure 1 from: Crowther A, Fautin D, Wallace C (2011) Stylobates birtlesi sp. n., a new species of carcinoecium-forming sea anemone (Cnidaria, Actiniaria, Actiniidae) from eastern Australia. ZooKeys 89: 33-48. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.89.825
Figure 1 - Stylobates birtlesi sp. n. holotype MTQ G57579 a, b soon after collection (photo: RA Birtles) c, d preserved specimen with Sympagurus trispinosus showing position of oral disc of anemone e preserved specimen: shortest tentacles beside longest ones (on right side of oral disc in this view); tentacles grade in length between longest and shortest around other side of oral disc (dashed line indicates directive axis) f preserved specimen without hermit crab showing aperture and part of carcinoecium not covered by anemone (arrow). Scale bars 20 mm.
Figures 1- 2 from: Shaw M, Jennings M, Quicke D (2011) The identity of Scambus planatus (Hartig, 1838) and Scambus ventricosus (Tschek, 1871) as seasonal forms of Scambus calobatus (Gravenhorst, 1829) in Europe (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae, Ephialtini). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 23: 55-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.23.1974
Figures 1- 2 - Head, dosal aspect, of Scambus calobatus morphs (female). 1, "calobatus". 2, "planatus/ventricosus" (equivalent in this respect). The specimen in Fig. 1 is the offspring of that in Fig. 2, from the "Chinon experiment" (see text); respectively BCLDQ0371 and BCLDQ0370 in Table 1.
Figure 3 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 3 - A Neighbor-joining tree calculated by BOLD for ITS2 DNA barcode sequences amplified directly from genomic DNA (labels include corresponding collector and GenBank number; see dx.doi.org/10.5883/DS-CRATMONO and Table 1 for details). Dashed lines indicate the sectional affinity of the sequences B The corresponding Neighbor-Net network for the cloned ITS2 sequences has three branches representing: (a) ribotypes from individuals of Crataegus monogyna, and from its hybrids with both Crataegus suksdorfii and Crataegus punctata; (b) ribotypes from individuals of Crataegus suksdorfii and Crataegus ×cogswellii; and (c) ribotypes from individuals of Crataegus punctata and Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae (Table 3). The numbers shown are the % bootstrap support for each of the three branches.
Figure 4 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 4 - Geographic distribution of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. and Crataegus monogyna in Ontario. Filled square, holotype of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae; Crosses, TRT specimens of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae; asterisks, Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae specimens cited by Wells and Phipps (1989); stars, specimens of Crataegus monogyna in MT, MTMG, QFA, TRT, and UBC. Crataegus punctata occurs throughout the region depicted (Phipps and Muniyamma 1980; this paper also maps additional records for Crataegus monogyna).
Figure 6 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 6 - Holotype of Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. (♀Crataegus monogyna × ♂Crataegus punctata): TRT00002197, CANADA, Ontario, Peel R M, loc. ON22, Don Gould Park and E side of Erin Mills Parkway, 43°35'N, 79°40'W, abandoned fields with extensive hawthorn colonization, 2 Jun 1989, Dickinson D1492.
Figure 5 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 5 - Geographic distribution of Crataegus ×cogswellii K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. and its parental species in the Pacific Northwest. Filled square, holotype of Crataegus ×cogswellii; crosses, TRT specimens of Crataegus ×cogswellii; circles, diploid Crataegus suksdorfii; stars, Crataegus monogyna (specimens in OSC, TRT, UBC, and WTU).
Figure 7 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 7 - Holotype of Crataegus ×cogswellii K.I. Chr. & T.A. Dickinson nothosp. nov. (♀Crataegus suksdorfii × ♂Crataegus monogyna): TRT00002574, U.S.A., Oregon, Linn Co., Cogswell-Foster Preserve, 44.333082°N, 123.122547°W, 3 Sep 2009, Dickinson & Dickinson 2009-40.
Figure 2 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 2 - A Principal components analysis of 39 Fourier amplitudes for 86 subterminal short shoot leaves from 20 Crataegus individuals at the Cogswell-Foster Preserve in Linn Co., Oregon (one Crataegus suksdorfii (s), seven Crataegus monogyna (m), and 12 putative hybrids (h), Crataegus ×cogswellii). Leaf outlines illustrate the shape contrasts responsible for the ordination: in grey, six subterminal leaves from short shoots of a single individual (OR1–8) B Principal components analysis of 39 Fourier amplitudes averaged for leaves sampled regardless of position on short shoots of 64 herbarium specimens from the Cogswell-Foster Preserve and (circled points) other locations in the Pacific Northwest (Table 1). In both A and B the two PCA axes shown are significant according to the broken-stick criterion (Frontier 1976). In B arrowed point 1 represents the single individual of Crataegus suksdorfii for which individual leaves are represented in A, while arrowed point 2 represents the averaged data for the six leaves of Crataegus monogyna shown in grey in A.
Figure 1 from: Dickinson T, Christensen K, Zarrei M, Kuzmina M, Talent N, Lin C (2014) Crataegus ×ninae-celottiae and C. ×cogswellii (Rosaceae, Maleae), two spontaneously formed intersectional nothospecies. PhytoKeys 36: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.36.6784
Figure 1 - Principal components analysis biplot for five morphometric descriptors averaged for each of 41 Crataegus herbarium specimens from the Cogswell-Foster Preserve and other locations in the Pacific Northwest (Crataegus suksdorfii (s), Crataegus monogyna (m), and the putative hybrid, Crataegus ×cogswellii (h)): relX, leaf length above the widest point, scaled by the width; relZ, leaf length below the widest point, scaled by the width; invDI, inverse dissection index = 2(Aπ)1/2/P, where A is the leaf area and P is the leaf perimeter; STAM, number of stamens per flower; STYL, number of styles per flower. Both axes shown account for significant portions of the total variance according to the broken-stick criterion (Frontier 1976).
Figure 2 from: Leavitt S, Fernández-Mendoza F, Pérez-Ortega S, Divakar P, Lumbsch T, St. Clair L (2013) DNA barcode identification of lichen-forming fungal species in the Rhizoplaca melanophthalma species-complex (Lecanorales, Lecanoraceae), including five new species. MycoKeys 7: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.7.4508
Figure 2 - A Cartoon representation of the maximum likelihood ITS topology obtained from 240 Rhizoplaca melanophthalma sensu lato specimens in Leavitt et al. (in review). Values at each node indicate non-parametric-bootstrap support; only support values > 50% are indicated B Box plots of ITS genetic distances within each new species, all intraspecific distances, and all interspecific distances. In each box plot, the box shows the interquartile range (IQR) of the data. The IQR is defined as the difference between the 75th percentile and the 25th percentile. The solid and dotted line through the box represent the median and the average length, respectively; and C The coalescent-based species-tree for the Rhizoplaca melanophthalma species-complex estimated from five genetic markers (ITS, IGS, group I intron, β-tubulin, and MCM7 loci) in Leavitt et al. 2011a.
Figure 1 from: Leavitt S, Fernández-Mendoza F, Pérez-Ortega S, Divakar P, Lumbsch T, St. Clair L (2013) DNA barcode identification of lichen-forming fungal species in the Rhizoplaca melanophthalma species-complex (Lecanorales, Lecanoraceae), including five new species. MycoKeys 7: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.7.4508
Figure 1 - Variation in morphology and habit within Rhizoplaca melanophthalma sensu lato. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Figure 1 from: dos Santos G (2012) On immature and adult forms of Trichognathus marginipennis Latreille, 1829 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Galeritini). ZooKeys 212: 45-62. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.212.2705
Figure 1 - Trichognathus marginipennis: a habitus of third instar larva in dorsal view; habitus of pupa b dorsal view c ventral view d lateral view.
Figure 1 from: Toome M, Aime M (2014) Pycnopulvinus aurantiacus gen. et sp. nov., a new sporocarp-forming member of Pucciniomycotina. MycoKeys 8: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.8.7676
Figure 1 - Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the placement of Pycnopulvinus aurantiacus in relation to other known members of Heterogastridiaceae. The analysis was performed with combined LSU and ITS sequence data and the topology was rooted with Rhodotorula yarrowii. The numbers above and below branches show the bootstrap and posterior probability values, respectively. LSU and ITS GenBank accession numbers of each used strain are given in the brackets. Superscript letter T indicates sequence data that originate from the type.
Figure 1 from: Zach P, Panigaj Ľ, Honěk A, Nedvěd O, Kulfan J, Martinková Z, Selyemová D, Viglášová S, Roy H (2014) The invasion history, distribution and colour pattern forms of the harlequin ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pall.) (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) in Slovakia, Central Europe. ZooKeys 412: 89-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.412.6587
Figure 1 - Distribution of Harmonia axyridis across Slovakia with the time sequence of the 153 records. Map of the Databank of the Fauna of Slovakia in which each "square" is approximately 11 by 12 km. White circles = 2008, grey circles = 2009, black circles = 2010–2012.
Figure 1 from: Kirika PM, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Mugambi G, Orock EA, Leavitt SD, Gatheri GW, Lumbsch HT (2016) Phylogenetic studies uncover a predominantly African lineage in a widely distributed lichen-forming fungal species. MycoKeys 14: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.14.8971
Figure 1 - Phylogenetic relationships among Parmelinella taxa based on a maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis of a concatenated, three locus dataset (ITS, nuLSU & mtSSU rDNA). Since the ML and Bayesian inference topologies were identical, only the ML topology is shown here. Posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95/ ML bootstrap values ≥ 70% are given above the branches.
Figures 1-4 from: Serri S, Frisch J, von Rintelen T (2016) Genetic variability of two ecomorphological forms of Stenus Latreille, 1797 in Iran, with notes on the infrageneric classification of the genus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Steninae). ZooKeys 626: 67-86. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.626.8155
Figures 1-4 - 1 Stenus erythrocnemus Eppelsheim, 1884. 2 Stenus callidus Baudi di Selve, 1848. 3 Haplotype network for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) DNA sequences of Stenus erythrocnemus. The circle size shows the frequency of the haplotypes. Each dashed line represents a single mutation. 4 Haplotype network for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) DNA sequences of Stenus callidus. The circle size shows the frequency of the haplotypes. Each dashed line represents a single mutation. Scale bars: 1mm.
Figure 1 from: Grewe F, Lagostina E, Wu H, Printzen C, Lumbsch HT (2018) Population genomic analyses of RAD sequences resolves the phylogenetic relationship of the lichen-forming fungal species Usnea antarctica and Usnea aurantiacoatra. MycoKeys 43: 91-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.43.29093
Figure 1 Phylogenetic tree inferred from the U.antarctica and U.aurantiacoatraRADseq data. The clades of each species are highlighted by brackets. Bootstrap values are indicated at the branches. The unit of branch length is substitutions per site. Note that branches leading to both major clades were abbreviated by 0.4 substitutions per site.
Supplementary material 1 from: Grewe F, Lagostina E, Wu H, Printzen C, Lumbsch HT (2018) Population genomic analyses of RAD sequences resolves the phylogenetic relationship of the lichen-forming fungal species Usnea antarctica and Usnea aurantiacoatra. MycoKeys 43: 91-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.43.29093
Origin of samples used for this study :
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.