Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 10. A–I in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 10. A–I. Ripidiorhynchushuotinus (Verneuil, 1845). A–D. CNIGR 763/4572 from the early Famennian, Zadonsk Horizon, central regions of Russia, in ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views. Sosna River basin. E–I.CNIGR 4/13076, ventral, dorsal, lateral, posterior, and anterior views. Kamenka village. J–Q. Ripidiorhynchusgriasicus (Nalivkin, 1934), from early Famennian, Elets Horizon, Sosna River basin. J–M. Neotype. CNIGR 266/4572, ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views. N–Q. CNIGR1046/4572, ventral, lateral, dorsal, and anterior views. R–U. Ripidiorhynchuscernosemicus (Nalivkin, 1934) CNIGR 862/4572, ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views. Early Famennian, Zadonsk Horizon, Sosna River basin. All × 1.5.

Fig. 15 in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 15. Transverse serial sections of Globulirhynchiaminima sp. nov. from the early Famennian, Evlanovo Horizon, Don River basin, Zadonsk region, central Russia.Numbers refer to distances in mm from the top of the ventral umbo. A. CNIGR 15/13076. B. CNIGR 16/13076. C. CNIGR 17/13076.

Fig. 5. A in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 5. A. Stratigraphic column of section 8 (see Fig. 3B); distribution of Globulirhynchia minima sp. nov. and other co−occurring brachiopods within the Evlanovo Horizon. B. Stratigraphical column of section 5 (see Fig. 3B); the uppermost part of the Frasnian, Livny Horizon. C. Stratigraphical column of section 6 (see Fig. 3B); appearance and distribution of Ripidiorhynchushuotinus (Verneuil, 1845) in Zadonsk Horizon. D. Stratigraphical column of section 1 (see Fig. 3B); distribution of Ripidiorhynchus griasicus (Nalivkin, 1934) in Elets horizon.

Fig. 12. A in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 12. A. Transverse serial section of Ripidiorhynchus huotinus (Verneuil, 1845). Numbers refer to distances in mm from the top of the ventral umbo, CNIGR 7/13076. B. Longitudinal section. CNIGR 8/13076. C. Reconstruction of the crural plates, CNIGR 9/13076. Early Frasnian, Zadonsk Horizon, Kamenka village, Elets region. D. CNIGR 10/13076 Zadonsk Horizon, Zadonsk region.

Fig. 8 in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 8. Early Frasnian (Pa.transitansZone)Ripidiorhynchus from Main Devonian Field, northwestwern Russia. A–D. Ripidiorhynchusaldogus (Nalivkin, 1941), CNIGR 40/6993, ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views. Pskov beds, Sjas River, Konopljankina village. E–P. Ripidiorhynchuslivonicus (Buch, 1834). E–H. CNIGR 45/6993, ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views. Chudovo beds, Velikaya River, Vybuty rapids. I–L. CNIGR 47/6993, ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views. Chudovo beds, Kerest River, Luki village. M–P. CNIGR 37/6993, in ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views. Pskov beds, Velikaya River. All × 1.5

Fig. 1 in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 1. Diversity dynamics of the Late Devonian rhynchonellids in the East European Platform (EEP). Three radiation levels of the Late Devonian rhynchonellids are marked as dotted areas. Devonian sea−level curve (after Johnson et al. 1985) and curve of relative Devonian sea−level changes in Moscow Syneclise (after Alekseev et al. 1996). The Standard Conodont Zonation by Klapper and Ziegler 1979, Ziegler and Sandberg 1990 and Conodont Zonation for Devonian of the East European Platform (EEP) proposed by Aristov 1988.

Fig. 14. A–E in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 14. A–E. Globulirhynchia minima sp. nov. from late Frasnian, Evlanovo Horizon, Chlevnoe village, Don River Basin. A–D. Holotype, CNIGR 13/13076, ventral, dorsal, lateral, and anterior views, × 5. E. CNIGR 14/13076, × 2. F–M. Paromoeopygma koscharica (Nalivkin, 1934) from early Famennian, Zadonsk Horizon, Koschary village, Zadonsk region. F–I. Neotype, CNIGR 1085/4572 ventral, dorsal, anterior, and lateral views, × 1.5. J–M. CNIGR 1083/4572, × 1.5.

Fig. 11 in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 11. Growth changes of shell of the Ripidiorhynchushuotinus (Verneuil, 1845) from the early Famennian, Zadonsk Horizon, Kamenka village, showing different fold deflection of the dorsal valve. A. CNIGR 5/13076. B. CNIGR 6/13076. C. CNIGR 4/13076.

Fig. 13 in Frasnian-Famennian extinction and recovery of rhynchonellid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 13. Transverse serial sections of Ripidiorhynchus griasicus (Nalivkin, 1934) from the early Famennian, Elets Horizon. Numbers refer to distances in mm from the top of the ventral umbo. A. CNIGR 11/13076. Argamach quarry, Elets region, B. CNIGR 12/13076. Lavy quarry, Elets region.

FIGURE 6. Shaded coloured 3D in Elongated theropod tracks from the Cretaceous Apenninic Carbonate Platform of southern Latium (central Italy

FIGURE 6. Shaded coloured 3D photogrammetric model of footprint F1 and F2 with relative section (S4) passing through the metatarsal impression and digit III.

FIGURE 5. Shaded coloured 3D in Elongated theropod tracks from the Cretaceous Apenninic Carbonate Platform of southern Latium (central Italy

FIGURE 5. Shaded coloured 3D photogrammetric model of footprint F3 and relative sections (S1, S2, S3).

FIGURE 2 in Elongated theropod tracks from the Cretaceous Apenninic Carbonate Platform of southern Latium (central Italy

FIGURE 2. Thin sections of the trampled block. 1, Nezzazata isabellae; 2, Cuneolina sliteri; 3, Aligned spathic calcite crystals suggesting emersive condition of the surface during trampling. Scale bar equals 0,5 mm (1 and 2) and 1,5 mm (3).

FIGURE 1 in Elongated theropod tracks from the Cretaceous Apenninic Carbonate Platform of southern Latium (central Italy

FIGURE 1. Map of provenance (black footprint) and present location of the track-bearing block (Lido di Porto Canale-Riomartino, grey spot).

FIGURE 4. 1, Shaded grey 3D in Elongated theropod tracks from the Cretaceous Apenninic Carbonate Platform of southern Latium (central Italy

FIGURE 4. 1, Shaded grey 3D photogrammetric model of the track-bearing block; 2, Shaded coloured 3D photogrammetric model.

FIGURE 3. 1 in Elongated theropod tracks from the Cretaceous Apenninic Carbonate Platform of southern Latium (central Italy

FIGURE 3. 1, The track-bearing block; 2, Close-up of the studied footprints; 3, Orthophoto of the trampled block; 4, Interpretative field drawing (scale bar equals 10 cm); F1, F2 and F3 indicate the three theropod tracks discussed in the text; A-D indicate poorly preserved traces, possibly produced by the trackmaker of F1, F2, and F3.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →

DIVERSITY OF URBAN REPTILES IN THREE MAJOR AMAZONIAN MUNICIPALITIES: AN ASSESSMENT USING A CITIZEN SCIENCE PLATFORM

This dataset describes the distribution of reptiles in three Amazonian cities (Belém, Manaus and Rio Branco) compiled from the citizen science platform Inaturalist. The dataset consist of photographs of reptiles taken in those cities available in the Inaturalist until December 2023. This data supports the scientific manuscript in preparation: Diversity of urban reptiles in three major Amazonian municipalities: an assessment using a citizen science platform. The dataset consist of a excel spreadsheet structured in 15 columns described below: ·         Seq: a numerical sequence ·         Inaturalist link: link to each of the photographs on the platform ·         Photographer: photographer's identity according to the platform ·         Date: date ·         City: city ·         Latitude: geographic coordinate available on the platform ·         Longitude: geographic coordinate available on the platform ·         Coordinates precision (m): coordinate precision ·         Used in spatial analysis: indicates whether that photograph was used (yes) or not (no) in the spatial analyses conducted in the study ·         Squamate group: identifies the three groups of reptiles studied as lizards, snakes or worm lizard ·         Species name (Inaturalist): species identification according to the platform ·         Standard species name (Guedes et al. 2023): standardization of species names following Guedes, T. B., Entiauspe-Neto, O. M., & Costa, H. C. (2023). List of reptiles of Brazil: 2022 update. Herpetologia Brasileira, 12(1), 56-161. ·         # of identifiers: number of platform contributors who suggested the species identity ·         Environment: indicates whether the photograph was taken in an urban or forest/rural environment ·         Landscape: indicates whether the animal photographed in an urban environment was inside or in the edge of an urban forest fragment, in an urbanized area less than 300 m from a forest fragment, in an urbanized area more than 300 m from a forest fragment, or outside an urban environment (not applied)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →

AI Platforms Overview for Higher Education

This release includes a detailed table comparing various AI platforms. The table covers: <ul> <li>Focus: Primary applications of each platform.</li> <li>Strengths: Key features and benefits.</li> <li>Uniqueness: Distinctive aspects.</li> <li>Limitations: Notable constraints.</li> </ul> How to Use <ol> <li>Download the attached file.</li> <li>Review the table for a comprehensive comparison.</li> </ol> DOI For more information, visit the DOI page: [10.5281/zenodo.13738758](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13738758) Contact For any inquiries, contact [bsrinivasan@twu.edu](mailto:bsrinivasan@twu.edu).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2006View details →

Fig. 8. A–C. Tetracornella tetraspinosa Zaspelova, 1952. A. Male left valve PIN 5128 in Benthic ostracods from the Early-Middle Frasnian transition in the north-western East European Platform, Russia

Fig. 8. A–C. Tetracornella tetraspinosa Zaspelova, 1952. A. Male left valve PIN 5128/16; sample 6/4; Porkhov Beds, Palmatolepis punctata Zone. B. Male left valve PIN 5128/17; borehole No 5, sample i5/202; Porkhov Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. C. Female right valve PIN 5128/18; Svinord Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. D, E. Tetracornella? sp. nov. A. Female carapaces PIN 5128/19 and PIN 5128/20 in left and right lateral views; CDF, Il'men borehole, sample 67; Semiluki Horizon, Pa. punctata Zone. F. Tetracornella formosa Zaspelova, 1952. Female left valve PIN 5128/21; MDF, borehole No 5, sample i5/205; Pa. punctata Zone. G, H. Tetracornella cf. glebovskaja Zaspelova, 1952. G. Female left valve PIN 5128/22; MDF, Porkhov section, sample 98−6/3; Porkhov Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. H. Male left valve PIN 5128/23; MDF, Porkhov section, sample 98−6/4; Porkhov Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. I, L. Tetracornella schelonica Zaspelova, 1952. I. Female right valve PIN 5128/24; MDF, Porkhov section, sample 98−6/4; Porkhov Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. L. Female left valve PIN 5128/25; MDF, borehole No 6, sample i6/44; Pa. punctata Zone. J, K. Tetracornella sp. nov. B aff. schelonica Zaspelova, 1952. J. Female right valve PIN 5128/26; MDF, borehole No 6, sample i6/44; Pa. punctata Zone. K. Female right valve PIN 5128/27; MDF, Porkhov section, sample 98−6/3; Porkhov Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. M–O. Neodrepanella tricornis (Batalina, 1941). M. Carapace PIN 5128/28 in left lateral view; MDF, borehole No 5, sample i5/209; Porkhov Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. N, O. Right valves PIN 5128/29 and PIN 5128/30; MDF, Koloshka River; Svinord Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. P. Neodrepanella gnedensis Zaspelova, 1952. Right valve PIN 5128/31; MDF, Porkhov section, sample 98−6/4; Porkhov Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. Q, R. Neodrepanella tichomirovi Zaspelova, 1952. Right and left valves PIN 5128/32 and PIN 5128/33; CDF, sample CDF−9/9; Semiluki Horizon, Pa. punctata Zone. S. Neodrepanella aff. parva Zaspelova, 1952. Carapace PIN 5128/34 in left lateral view; CDF, Il'men borehole, sample 49; Semiluki Horizon, Pa. punctata Zone. T. Neodrepanella cf. prisca Zaspelova, 1952. Left valve PIN 5128/35, MDF, Izborsk Quarry section, sample 5/1; Dubnik Beds, Pa. transitans Zone. U. Neodrepanella sp. Right valve PIN 5128/36; MDF, Koloshka River, Svinord Beds, Pa. punctata Zone. Scale bars 0.1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2006View details →

Fig. 10 in Early-Middle Frasnian cyrtospiriferid brachiopods from the East European Platform

Fig. 10. Cyrtospiriferids from Middle Frasnian of the Main and Central Devonian Fields. A–C. Cyrtospirifer tenticulum (Verneuil, 1845). A. Buregi Beds, Main Devonian Field. CNIGR 93/6993, neotype, ventral (A1), dorsal (A2), posterior (A3), and lateral (A4) views. B, C Semiluki Horizon, Central Devonian Field. B. CNIGR 3535/2858, ventral (B1), dorsal (B2), posterior (B3), anterior (B4), and lateral (B5) views, and shell surface showing microornament (B6). C. CNIGR 3534/2858, ventral (C1), dorsal (C2), posterior (C3), anterior (C4), and lateral (C5) views. D, E. Cyrtospirifer lictor Nalivkin, 1930, Semiluki Horizon, Don river, Central Devonian Field. D. CNIGR 3530/2858, ventral (D1), dorsal (D2), posterior (D3), anterior (D4), and lateral (D5) views. E. CNIGR 3531/2858, ventral (E1), posterior (E2), anterior (E3), and lateral (E4) views. F. Cyrtospirifer sp. A, Porkhov Beds, Main Devonian Field. CNIGR 11/13157, ventral (F1), posterior (F2), anterior (F3), and lateral (F4) views. G, H. Cyrtospirifer schelonicus (Nalivkin, 1941), Svinord Beds, Main Devonian Field. G. CNIGR 88/6993, ventral (G1), dorsal (G2), posterior (G3), and lateral (G4) views. H. CNIGR 87/6993, ventral (H1), dorsal (H2), posterior (H3), and lateral (H4) views. I. Cyrtospirifer tschudovi Nalivkin, 1941, Chudovo Beds, Main Devonian Field, CNIGR 1/6993, ventral (I1) and posterior (I2) views.