Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
261
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
261 results for “Research assessment”
Automatic Multimodal Assessment of Occurrence and Intensity of Pain for Research and Clinical Use
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04833244. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Mid-Atlantic Research Group Single-Operator Cholangioscopic Assessment of Biliary Strictures
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02615210. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 15.
Dane County Safety Assessment (SAFE) Research Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00140322. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Figure 3 from: Moldovan OT, Øvrevik Skoglund R, Banciu HL, Dinu Cucoș A, Levei EA, Perșoiu A, Lauritzen S-E (2019) Monitoring and risk assessment for groundwater sources in rural communities of Romania (GROUNDWATERISK). Research Ideas and Outcomes 5: e48898. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e48898
Figure 3 The flow of the WPs and their relationship.
Figure 1 from: Moldovan OT, Øvrevik Skoglund R, Banciu HL, Dinu Cucoș A, Levei EA, Perșoiu A, Lauritzen S-E (2019) Monitoring and risk assessment for groundwater sources in rural communities of Romania (GROUNDWATERISK). Research Ideas and Outcomes 5: e48898. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e48898
Figure 1 The project logo.
Figure 8 from: Sharaf MR, Aldawood AS, Mohamed AA, Hita Garcia F (2020) The genus Lepisiota Santschi, 1926 of the Arabian Peninsula with the description of a new species, Lepisiota elbazi sp. nov. from Oman, an updated species identification key, and assessment of zoogeographic affinities. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 76: 127-152. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.76.50193
Figure 8 Zoogeographic analysis of the Arabian Lepisiota.
Figure 7 from: Sharaf MR, Aldawood AS, Mohamed AA, Hita Garcia F (2020) The genus Lepisiota Santschi, 1926 of the Arabian Peninsula with the description of a new species, Lepisiota elbazi sp. nov. from Oman, an updated species identification key, and assessment of zoogeographic affinities. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 76: 127-152. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.76.50193
Figure 7 Ayn Razat, the type locality of Lepisiota elbazi sp. nov. (Mostafa Sharaf).
A Two-Stage Research Performance Assessment of Turkish Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Beta Regression
<p>Raw data used in the first and second stage of our analysis.</p>
Figure 5 from: Schmitt M, Uhl G (2017) Oulema septentrionis and O. erichsonii are neither conspecific nor melanic variants of O. melanopus as assessed by micro CT analysis of their lectotypes (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Criocerinae). In: Chaboo CS, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 7. ZooKeys 720: 121-130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.720.19760
Figure 5 - Flagella of a Oulema duftschmidi b O. melanopus, photos taken at the same magnification.
Figure 6 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 6 Rating criteria for the analysis of the evaluated tools.
Figure 11 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 11 Result of the assessment for the task overview changes.
Figure 8 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 8 Result of the assessment for the task identify splits.
Figure 3 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 3 An abstract representation of TaxVis´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
Figure 4 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 4 An abstract representation of TTT´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
Figure 10 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 10 Result of the assessment for the task identify moves.
Figure 13 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 13 Summary of the assessment, contrasting tasks and tools.
Figure 1 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 1 Components of the process for the comparison of biological taxonomies.
Figure 9 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 9 Result of the assessment for the task identify merges.
Figure 5 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 5 An abstract representation of ProvenanceMatrix´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
Figure 2 from: Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018) Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e25742. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Figure 2 An abstract representation of TreeJuxtaposer´s environment for taxonomy comparison.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.