Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11 in A review of Bennelongia De Deckker & McKenzie, 1981 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) species from eastern Australia with the description of three new species

Fig. 11. Bennelongia harpago De Deckker & Mckenzie, 1981, all from Lake Powlathanga, QLD. A. ♀, LVi (W40014). B. ♀, RVi (W40014). C. ♀, CpRl (W40015). D. ♀, Cp dorsal (RS35). E. ♀, RVi detail anteriorly (W40014). Scales: A-D = 500 μm, E = 100 μm.

Fig. 7 in A review of Bennelongia De Deckker & McKenzie, 1981 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) species from eastern Australia with the description of three new species

Fig. 7. Bennelongia regina sp. nov., all from Horseshoe Lagoon, QLD (Type locality). A. ♀, LVi (W40061). B. ♀, RVi (W40061). C. Holotype Ƌ, LVi (W40060). D. Holotype Ƌ, RVi (W40060). E. ♀, Cp dorsal (W40067). F. ♀, Cp ventral (W40066). G. Ƌ, Cp ventral (W40063). H. Ƌ, Cp dorsal (W40062). I. Holotype Ƌ, RVi detail anteriorly (W40060). J. Holotype Ƌ, RVi detail anteriorly (W40060). K. Ƌ, CpRl (W40064). L. Allotype ♀, CpRl (W40074). Scales: A-H, K-L = 1000 μm, J = 200 μm, I = 100 μm.

Fig. 10 in A review of Bennelongia De Deckker & McKenzie, 1981 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) species from eastern Australia with the description of three new species

Fig. 10. Bennelongia pinpi De Deckker, 1981. (A-D = W40043 from Pelican Lake QLD, E = W40035 from Lake Louisa QLD). A-B. Outlines of hemipenes. C. Left prehensile palp. D. Right prehensile palp. E. Left prehensile palp. Scales: A-B = 156.3 μm, C-D = 89.3 μm, E = 42.6 μm.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed with 57 in A review of Bennelongia De Deckker & McKenzie, 1981 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) species from eastern Australia with the description of three new species

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed with 57 novel COI sequences of Bennelongia, 26 published Bennelongia sequences and one Heterocypris spec. as outgroup (sequence names are given in brackets at the end of species names). This tree represents two trees of identical topology inferred by ML and BI. Bootstrap values (for 1000 bootstrap replicates) from ML analyses and Bayesian posterior probabilities (ranging from 0 to 1) are shown for each node (in the format: 'Bootstrap Support/Posterior Probability'). Branch lengths are proportional to the genetic distance scale at the bottom left. Clades with published sequences have been collapsed; the number of sequences in these clades is included in brackets after the species name. Nodes with less than 50% bootstrap support and a posterior probability of less than 0.5 have been collapsed. The tree shows six strongly supported clades that correspond to the species presented in this study.

Fig. 2 in Deep-sea nematodes (Comesomatidae) from the Southwest Pacific Ocean: five new species and three new species records

Fig. 2. Cervonema shiae Chen & Vincx, 2000 and Cervonema kaikouraensis sp. nov. light micrographs. A. Large sperm cells without nuclei in anterior testis of C. shiae. B. Small nucleated sperm in posterior testis of C. shiae. C. Large sperm cells without nuclei in anterior testis of C. kaikouraensis sp. nov. D. Small nucleated sperm in posterior testis of C. kaikouraensis sp. nov. Arrows point to the lenticular nuclei situated on the periphery of the small sperm cells in the posterior testes of both species. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Fig. 1 in Deep-sea nematodes (Comesomatidae) from the Southwest Pacific Ocean: five new species and three new species records

Fig. 1. Cervonema shiae Chen & Vincx, 2000. A. Ƌ anterior body region. B. Lateral view of Ƌ head region. C. ♀ reproductive system. D. ♀ tail. E. Ƌ posterior body region showing reproductive system and copulatory apparatus. Scale bar: A = 40 μm; B = 35 μm; C = 65 μm; D = 30 μm; E = 60 μm.

Fig. 5 in Three new species of Eupetersia Blüthgen, 1928 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Oriental Region

Fig. 5. Eupetersia yanegai sp. nov, ♀ paratype. A. Lateral view of head and mesosoma. B. Head, facial view. C. Head and mesosoma, dorsal view. D. Propodeum. E. Metasoma. F. Geographic distribution.

Fig. 3. Eupetersia nathani Baker, 1974 in Three new species of Eupetersia Blüthgen, 1928 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Oriental Region

Fig. 3. Eupetersia nathani Baker, 1974, ♀ holotype. A. Lateral habitus. B. Dorsal view of habitus. C. Facial view. D. Geographic distribution.

Fig. 2 in Three new species of Eupetersia Blüthgen, 1928 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Oriental Region

Fig. 2. Eupetersia sabahensis sp. nov., ♂ holotype. A. Lateral habitus. B. Dorsal view of head and mesosoma. C. Facial view. D. Propodeum. E. Metasoma. F. Geographic distribution.

Fig. 4 in Three new species of Eupetersia Blüthgen, 1928 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Oriental Region

Fig. 4. Eupetersia yanegai sp. nov., ♂ holotype. A. Dorsal view of habitus. B. Lateral habitus. C. Head, facial view. D. Mesosoma and head. E. Propodeaum. F. Metasoma.

Fig. 7 in Three new species of Eupetersia Blüthgen, 1928 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Oriental Region

Fig. 7. Malaise trap in a mangrove swamp, habitat of Eupetersia singaporensis sp. nov., Kranji Nature Trail (Sungei Buloh), Singapore.

Fig. 1 in Three new species of Eupetersia Blüthgen, 1928 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Oriental Region

Fig. 1. Eupetersia singaporensis sp. nov., ♂ holotype. A. Lateral habitus. B. Dorsal view of head and mesosoma. C. Facial view. D, Propodeum. E. Metasoma. F. Geographic distribution.

Fig. 2. A. D in Three new species of Dolichoiulus millipedes from the underground of Gran Canaria, with notes on the circumscription of the genus (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

Fig. 2. A. D. typhlocanaria sp. nov., male from Cueva de la Luna, midbody rings. Scale 0.1 mm. B. D. oromii sp. nov., detail of posterior margin of midbody ring, showing diagnostic setae. Scale 0.05 mm.

Fig. 4. Posterior gonopods, mesal views. A. D in Three new species of Dolichoiulus millipedes from the underground of Gran Canaria, with notes on the circumscription of the genus (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

Fig. 4. Posterior gonopods, mesal views. A. D. typhlocanaria sp. nov., specimen from Barranco Draguillo. B. D. typhlocanaria sp. nov., specimen from Cueva de la Luna. C. D. oromii sp. nov. ap: anterior process, pp: posterior process, mp: mesomerital process. Scales 0.1 mm.

Fig. 6 in Three new species of Eupetersia Blüthgen, 1928 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Oriental Region

Fig. 6. Eupetersia yanegai sp. nov. A. ♂, end of metasoma with pygidial plate. B. ♀, end of metasoma without pygidial plate.

Fig. 1 in Three new species of Dolichoiulus millipedes from the underground of Gran Canaria, with notes on the circumscription of the genus (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

Fig. 1. Size diagram for Dolichoiulus typhlocanaria sp. nov. The diagram shows number of podous (leg-bearing) body rings (p.r., x axis) and vertical body diameter in mm (y axis). For a given number of podous rings D. typhlocanaria sp. nov. is thicker than the two other species (see Fig. 5), and females are thicker than males.

Fig. 6 in Capalictus, a new subgenus of Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 from South Africa, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Halictidae)

Fig. 6. Lasioglossum (Capalictus) tigrinum sp. nov., Ƌ. A. Head and forelegs. B. Mesoscutum and scutellum. C. Propodeum and metanotum. D. Metasoma, dorsal view. E. First tergum. F. Metasoma ventral view. Scale line = 0,5 mm.

Fig. 5 in Capalictus, a new subgenus of Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 from South Africa, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Halictidae)

Fig. 5. Lasioglossum (Capalictus) hantamense sp. nov., ♀. A. Head. B. Mesoscutum and scutellum. C. Propodeum and metanotum. D. First tergum. E. Metasoma. Scale line = 0,5 mm.

Fig. 10. Dorsal habitus. — A-B in Capalictus, a new subgenus of Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 from South Africa, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Halictidae)

Fig. 10. Dorsal habitus. — A-B. Lasioglossum mosselinum (Cockerell, 1945). A. ♀. B. Ƌ. — C-D. Lasioglossum timmermanni sp. nov. C. ♀. D. Ƌ. Scale line = 1 mm.

Fig. 18 in Capalictus, a new subgenus of Lasioglossum Curtis, 1833 from South Africa, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Halictidae)

Fig. 18. Summary of phylogenetic relationships of Capalictus relative to remaining Lasioglossum, based on Gibbs et al. 2012. Numbers represent posterior probability support values.