Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,023
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,023 results for “landing”
Decadal time series of spatially enhanced relative humidity for Europe at 30 arc seconds resolution (2000 - 2021) derived from ERA5-Land data
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land air temperature 2 m above ground and dewpoint temperature 2 m data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (<a href="https://chelsa-climate.org/">https://chelsa-climate.org/</a>). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds.<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>Subsequently, the temperature time series have been aggregated on a daily basis. From these, daily relative humidity has been calculated for the time period 01/2000 - 07/2021.</p> <p>Relative humidity (rh2m) has been calculated from air temperature 2 m above ground (Ta) and dewpoint temperature 2 m above ground (Td) using the formula for saturated water pressure from Wright (1997):</p> <p><code>maximum water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Ta / (240.97 + Ta))</code></p> <p><code>actual water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Td / (240.97 + Td))</code></p> <p><code>relative humidity = actual water pressure / maximum water pressure</code></p> <p>The resulting relative humidity has been aggregated to decadal averages. Each month is divided into three decades: the first decade of a month covers days 1-10, the second decade covers days 11-20, and the third decade covers days 21-last day of the month.</p> <p>Resultant values have been converted to represent percent * 10, thus covering a theoretical range of [0, 1000].</p> <p>File naming scheme (YYYY = year; MM = month; dD = number of decade):<br> <code>ERA5_land_rh2m_avg_decadal_YYYY_MM_dD.tif</code></p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> Decadal</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> Percent * 10 (scaled to Integer; example: value 738 = 73.8 %)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/">https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Reference: Wright, J.M. (1997): Federal meteorological handbook no. 3 (FCM-H3-1997). Office of Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research. Washington, DC</p> <p>Data is also available in EU LAEA (EPSG: 3035) projection: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7427010">https://zenodo.org/record/7427010</a></p>
PEATCLSM_Trop: Integrating peat-specific land surface hydrology of natural and drained tropical peatlands in the GEOS CLSM framework
<p>The datasets archived here include simulation results shown in the peer-reviewed article “Tropical peatland hydrology simulated with a global land surface model“, published in the open access AGU Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES; Apers et al., 2022). The output was produced using the Catchment land surface model (CLSM), the land model component of the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) modeling framework, and various versions of peatland-specific adaptations of CLSM, i.e. PEATCLSM. Here, we provide netCDF files (*.nc or *.nc4c) for CLSM, the natural (PEATCLSM<sub>Trop,Nat</sub>), and drained (PEATCLSM<sub>Trop,Drain</sub>) tropical versions of PEATCLSM. The simulations are at a 9-km spatial resolution (EASEv2 grid) for the three major tropical peatland regions in Central and South America, the Congo Basin, and Southeast Asia, using a peat grid cell distribution that is a combination of the PEATMAP distribution from Xu et al. (2018) and the peat distribution from De Lannoy et al. (2014). Simulations with the northern version of PEATCLSM (PEATCLSM<sub>North,Nat</sub>) are not included in the archived dataset but can be obtained upon request. We provide three types of netCDF files:<br> • daily_images_*.nc4c: daily land states and fluxes for variables discussed in Apers et al., (2022; Table 1), provided as netCDF image-chunked image stack;<br> • daily_mean_*.nc: 20-year mean of the land states and fluxes (Table 1), provided as a single netCDF image;<br> • daily_std_*.nc: 20-year standard deviation of the land states and fluxes (Table 1), provided as a single netCDF image.</p> <p>The file content is described in the file PEATCLSM_Trop-Simulations.pdf.</p> <p>Please contact Sebastian Apers (sebastian.apers@kuleuven.be) or Michel Bechtold (michel.bechtold@kuleuven.be) for any questions.<br> <br> References:<br> Apers, S., De Lannoy, G. J. M., Baird, A. J., Cobb, A. R., Dargie, G. C., del Aguila Pasquel, J., … others (2022). Tropical peatland hydrology simulated with a global land surface model. <em>Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems</em>. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002784<br> Bechtold, M., De Lannoy, G. J. M., Koster, R. D., Reichle, R. H., Mahanama, S. P., Bleuten, W., ... others (2019). PEAT-CLSM: A specific treatment of peatland hydrology in the NASA Catchment Land Surface Model. <em>Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11</em>(7), 2130–2162. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001574<br> De Lannoy, G. J. M., Koster, R. D., Reichle, R. H., Mahanama, S. P. P., & Liu, Q. (2014). An updated treatment of soil texture and associated hydraulic properties in a global land modeling system. <em>Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 6</em>(4), 957– 979. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000330<br> Xu, J., Morris, P. J., Liu, J., & Holden, J. (2018). PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. <em>Catena, 160</em>, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010</p>
A global spatiotemporally seamless daily mean land surface temperature from 2003 to 2019
<p>The global daily mean land surface temperature product (GADTC product) was generated based on the improved ADTC-based framework (termed IADTC framework) which basically combines the annual temperature cycle and diurnal temperature cycle model. </p> <p>The GADTC product is organized by year and each .tif image contains the global spatiotemporally seamless daily mean land surface temperature (LST) for each day with the unit of Kelvin. </p> <p>The demo code of the IADTC framework is available at https://github.com/faluhong/IADTC-framework. </p>
Daily time series of spatially enhanced relative humidity for Europe at 30 arc seconds resolution (Set 5: 2020 - 2021) derived from ERA5-Land data
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land air temperature 2 m above ground and dewpoint temperature 2 m data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (<a href="https://chelsa-climate.org/">https://chelsa-climate.org/</a>). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>Subsequently, the temperature time series have been aggregated on a daily basis. From these, daily relative humidity has been calculated for the time period 01/2000 - 07/2021.</p> <p>Relative humidity (rh2m) has been calculated from air temperature 2 m above ground (Ta) and dewpoint temperature 2 m above ground (Td) using the formula for saturated water pressure from Wright (1997):</p> <p><code>maximum water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Ta / (240.97 + Ta))</code></p> <p><code>actual water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Td / (240.97 + Td))</code></p> <p><code>relative humidity = actual water pressure / maximum water pressure</code></p> <p>Data provided is the daily averages of relative humidity. This set provides data for the years 2000 - 2004. For other time periods, please see further linked data sets.</p> <p>Resultant values have been converted to represent percent * 10, thus covering a theoretical range of [0, 1000].</p> <p>File naming scheme (YYYY = year; MM = month; DD = day):<br> <code>ERA5_land_rh2m_avg_daily_YYYYMMDD.tif</code></p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> Daily</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> Percent * 10 (scaled to Integer; example: value 738 = 73.8 %)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/">https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Reference: Wright, J.M. (1997): Federal meteorological handbook no. 3 (FCM-H3-1997). Office of Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research. Washington, DC</p> <p>Data is also available in EU LAEA (EPSG: 3035) projection: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7434396">https://zenodo.org/record/7434396</a></p>
Daily time series of spatially enhanced relative humidity for Europe at 30 arc seconds resolution (Set 3: 2010 - 2014) derived from ERA5-Land data
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land air temperature 2 m above ground and dewpoint temperature 2 m data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (<a href="https://chelsa-climate.org/">https://chelsa-climate.org/</a>). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>Subsequently, the temperature time series have been aggregated on a daily basis. From these, daily relative humidity has been calculated for the time period 01/2000 - 07/2021.</p> <p>Relative humidity (rh2m) has been calculated from air temperature 2 m above ground (Ta) and dewpoint temperature 2 m above ground (Td) using the formula for saturated water pressure from Wright (1997):</p> <p><code>maximum water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Ta / (240.97 + Ta))</code></p> <p><code>actual water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Td / (240.97 + Td))</code></p> <p><code>relative humidity = actual water pressure / maximum water pressure</code></p> <p>Data provided is the daily averages of relative humidity. This set provides data for the years 2000 - 2004. For other time periods, please see further linked data sets.</p> <p>Resultant values have been converted to represent percent * 10, thus covering a theoretical range of [0, 1000].</p> <p>File naming scheme (YYYY = year; MM = month; DD = day):<br> <code>ERA5_land_rh2m_avg_daily_YYYYMMDD.tif</code></p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> Daily</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> Percent * 10 (scaled to Integer; example: value 738 = 73.8 %)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/">https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Reference: Wright, J.M. (1997): Federal meteorological handbook no. 3 (FCM-H3-1997). Office of Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research. Washington, DC</p> <p>Data is also available in EU LAEA (EPSG: 3035) projection: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7432432">https://zenodo.org/record/7432432</a></p>
Daily time series of spatially enhanced relative humidity for Europe at 30 arc seconds resolution (Set 4: 2015 - 2019) derived from ERA5-Land data
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land air temperature 2 m above ground and dewpoint temperature 2 m data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (<a href="https://chelsa-climate.org/">https://chelsa-climate.org/</a>). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>Subsequently, the temperature time series have been aggregated on a daily basis. From these, daily relative humidity has been calculated for the time period 01/2000 - 07/2021.</p> <p>Relative humidity (rh2m) has been calculated from air temperature 2 m above ground (Ta) and dewpoint temperature 2 m above ground (Td) using the formula for saturated water pressure from Wright (1997):</p> <p><code>maximum water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Ta / (240.97 + Ta))</code></p> <p><code>actual water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Td / (240.97 + Td))</code></p> <p><code>relative humidity = actual water pressure / maximum water pressure</code></p> <p>Data provided is the daily averages of relative humidity. This set provides data for the years 2000 - 2004. For other time periods, please see further linked data sets.</p> <p>Resultant values have been converted to represent percent * 10, thus covering a theoretical range of [0, 1000].</p> <p>File naming scheme (YYYY = year; MM = month; DD = day):<br> <code>ERA5_land_rh2m_avg_daily_YYYYMMDD.tif</code></p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> Daily</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> Percent * 10 (scaled to Integer; example: value 738 = 73.8 %)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/">https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Reference: Wright, J.M. (1997): Federal meteorological handbook no. 3 (FCM-H3-1997). Office of Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research. Washington, DC</p> <p>Data is also available in EU LAEA (EPSG: 3035) projection: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7434447">https://zenodo.org/record/7434447</a></p>
Daily time series of spatially enhanced relative humidity for Europe at 30 arc seconds resolution (Set 1: 2000 - 2004) derived from ERA5-Land data
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land air temperature 2 m above ground and dewpoint temperature 2 m data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (<a href="https://chelsa-climate.org/">https://chelsa-climate.org/</a>). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>Subsequently, the temperature time series have been aggregated on a daily basis. From these, daily relative humidity has been calculated for the time period 01/2000 - 07/2021.</p> <p>Relative humidity (rh2m) has been calculated from air temperature 2 m above ground (Ta) and dewpoint temperature 2 m above ground (Td) using the formula for saturated water pressure from Wright (1997):</p> <p><code>maximum water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Ta / (240.97 + Ta))</code></p> <p><code>actual water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Td / (240.97 + Td))</code></p> <p><code>relative humidity = actual water pressure / maximum water pressure</code></p> <p>Data provided is the daily averages of relative humidity. This set provides data for the years 2000 - 2004. For other time periods, please see further linked data sets.</p> <p>Resultant values have been converted to represent percent * 10, thus covering a theoretical range of [0, 1000].</p> <p>File naming scheme (YYYY = year; MM = month; DD = day):<br> <code>ERA5_land_rh2m_avg_daily_YYYYMMDD.tif</code></p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> Daily</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> Percent * 10 (scaled to Integer; example: value 738 = 73.8 %)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/">https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Reference: Wright, J.M. (1997): Federal meteorological handbook no. 3 (FCM-H3-1997). Office of Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research. Washington, DC</p> <p>Data is also available in EU LAEA (EPSG: 3035) projection: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/6147830">https://zenodo.org/record/6147830</a></p>
Daily time series of spatially enhanced relative humidity for Europe at 30 arc seconds resolution (Set 2: 2005 - 2009) derived from ERA5-Land data
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land air temperature 2 m above ground and dewpoint temperature 2 m data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (<a href="https://chelsa-climate.org/">https://chelsa-climate.org/</a>). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>Subsequently, the temperature time series have been aggregated on a daily basis. From these, daily relative humidity has been calculated for the time period 01/2000 - 07/2021.</p> <p>Relative humidity (rh2m) has been calculated from air temperature 2 m above ground (Ta) and dewpoint temperature 2 m above ground (Td) using the formula for saturated water pressure from Wright (1997):</p> <p><code>maximum water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Ta / (240.97 + Ta))</code></p> <p><code>actual water pressure = 611.21 * exp(17.502 * Td / (240.97 + Td))</code></p> <p><code>relative humidity = actual water pressure / maximum water pressure</code></p> <p>Data provided is the daily averages of relative humidity. This set provides data for the years 2000 - 2004. For other time periods, please see further linked data sets.</p> <p>Resultant values have been converted to represent percent * 10, thus covering a theoretical range of [0, 1000].</p> <p>File naming scheme (YYYY = year; MM = month; DD = day):<br> <code>ERA5_land_rh2m_avg_daily_YYYYMMDD.tif</code></p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> Daily</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> Percent * 10 (scaled to Integer; example: value 738 = 73.8 %)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/">https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/licences/copernicus/</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Reference: Wright, J.M. (1997): Federal meteorological handbook no. 3 (FCM-H3-1997). Office of Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research. Washington, DC</p> <p>Data is also available in EU LAEA (EPSG: 3035) projection: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7434376">https://zenodo.org/record/7434376</a></p>
Global Daily Surface Blue-sky Albedo Climatology and Land Cover Climatology Dataset from 20-year MODIS Products (CMG)
<p>Surface albedo plays a critical role in climate, hydrological, and biogeochemical modeling and weather forecasting. Therefore, precisely mapping surface albedo climatology globally is necessary to better parameterize environmental systems. We generated a new global surface blue-sky actual and snow-free albedo climatology dataset from 20-year MODIS products from the Google Earth Engine (GEE). </p> <p>The 500m global surface blue-sky daily albedo climatology dataset is available at .... After reprojection and aggregation, the global Climate Modeling Grid (CMG) albedo climatology datasets at 0.05° and 0.5° are available here. All of the published datasets include historical and snow-free blue-sky albedo climatology data. For application convenience, the land cover climatology of MODIS product (MCD12Q1) is also generated and attached in the CMG files. The International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and PFT classification results of MCD12Q1 since 2001 were reprojected and aggregated to 0.05° and 0.5° by find mode in each aggregation group. In order to check the heterogeneity of the land cover climatology, the percentage of the dominant type in each aggregation group was also calculated.</p>
Land-use and climate drive shifts in Bombus assemblage composition
<p>Pollinators play pivotal roles in maintaining agricultural and natural plant communities, yet some bee populations are declining. The conversion of agricultural and semi-natural lands for urban use has reduced bee abundance and diversity. Additionally, climate change has affected bee distributions and led to disruption of plant-pollinator synchrony, impacting ecosystem processes. However, how these factors concurrently influence bee assemblages is poorly understood. Therefore, we linked differences in bumble bee (<em>Bombus</em>) diversity to landscape composition and climate in agroecosystems to understand their co-occurring effects. <em>Bombus </em>assemblages were evaluated in relation to the proportion of agricultural, semi-natural, and urban landscapes and interannual variation in temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity in Utah agroecosystems from 2014 to 2018. <em>Bombus </em>species richness and diversity were highest in rural agricultural landscapes characterized by low temperatures and high relative humidity during the growing season, and lowest in urbanized agricultural areas with high temperatures and low relative humidity. Ongoing and future land-use and climate change may therefore lead to reduced <em>Bombus </em>diversity in Utah. Although some historically uncommon species, such as <em>B. pensylvanicus, </em>may thrive under future land-use and climate scenarios, others (e.g., <em>B. sylvicola, B. californicus, </em>and <em>B. occidentalis</em>) are at increased risk of extirpation due to loss of suitable habitat. Continually monitoring <em>Bombus </em>populations will help document shifts in assemblages and potential consequential impacts to ecosystem services. These findings emphasize that management strategies should consider the effect of co-occurring factors based on geographic location and local diversity to prevent ecological homogenization and to foster future resiliency of <em>Bombus </em>populations.</p>
Global Surface Temperature Changes over Land Dataset
<p>Annual averages of global surface temperature changes for land only based on Berkeley Earth monthly dataset above the 1951-1980 baseline. The dataset is from 1750 in °C, 3 decimal places.</p>
Supplementary material for "Long-term trends of reproductive success of black grouse Lyrurus tetrix in the southern Swiss Alps in relation to changes in climate and land use"
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>Breeding success of an Alpine black grouse <em>Lyrurus tetrix</em> population in southern Switzerland was monitored from 1981 to 2020. This long-term dataset allows exploring relationships of reproductive rates with climate and habitat, which have shown marked changes during this period. Over the 40 years, the average elevation of black grouse breeding sites increased by around 100 m in Central/Southern Ticino but showed only a slight increase in Northern Ticino, where black grouse occur at higher elevations. Average reproductive rates in Northern Ticino remained constant throughout the study period but declined in Central/Southern Ticino. Relationships between reproductive success and weather as well as habitat variables were analysed with a multiple regression model. Temperature during the early chick-rearing phase and the time of egg-laying was positively correlated with reproductive rate. Correlations between reproductive rates and precipitation were less clear, and only small proportions of the variance in reproductive rates could be explained by precipitation. Brush forest explained the greatest amount of variation in reproductive rate (6.2%). Forest, alpine agricultural areas, and unproductive vegetation all showed a positive relationship with reproductive rate, but the proportion of the variance explained was small. Year (5.1%) and its interaction with region (2.3%) explained considerable amounts of the variance. While in Northern Ticino reproductive success did not show a negative trend when correcting for weather and habitat changes, there remained a negative trend over the years in Central/Southern Ticino. Despite the positive correlations of reproductive rate with temperature, increasing temperatures do not appear to have improved reproductive success, likely as a result of habitat changes that forced black grouse towards higher elevations. Changes in reproductive success were limited to the southern region, indicating deteriorating conditions at the edge of the distribution range.</p> <p> </p>
Annual maps of cropland abandonment, land cover, and other derived data for time-series analysis of cropland abandonment
<p>This archive contains raw annual land cover maps, cropland abandonment maps, and accompanying derived data products to support:</p> <blockquote> <p>Crawford C.L., Yin, H., Radeloff, V.C., and Wilcove, D.S. 2022. Rural land abandonment is too ephemeral to provide major benefits for biodiversity and climate. <em>Science Advances</em> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm8999">doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm8999</a><em>.</em></p> </blockquote> <p>An archive of the analysis scripts developed for this project can be found at: <a href="https://github.com/chriscra/abandonment_trajectories">https://github.com/chriscra/abandonment_trajectories</a> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6383127">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6383127</a>).</p> <p>Note that the label "_2022_02_07" in many file names refers to the date of the primary analysis. "dts” or “dt” refer to “data.tables," large .csv files that were manipulated using the data.table package in R (Dowle and Srinivasan 2021, <a href="http://r-datatable.com/">http://r-datatable.com/</a>). “Rasters” refer to “.tif” files that were processed using the raster and terra packages in R (Hijmans, 2022; <a href="https://rspatial.org/terra/">https://rspatial.org/terra/</a>; <a href="https://rspatial.org/raster">https://rspatial.org/raster</a>).</p> <p>Data files fall into one of four categories of data derived during our analysis of abandonment: <strong>observed</strong>, <strong>potential</strong>, <strong>maximum</strong>, or <strong>recultivation</strong>. Derived datasets also follow the same naming convention, though are aggregated across sites. These four categories are as follows (using “age_dts” for our site in Shaanxi Province, China as an example):</p> <ol> <li><strong>observed</strong> abandonment identified through our primary analysis, with a threshold of five years. These files do not have a specific label beyond the description of the file and the date of analysis (e.g., shaanxi_age_2022_02_07.csv);</li> <li><strong>potential</strong> abandonment for a scenario without any recultivation, in which abandoned croplands are left abandoned from the year of initial abandonment through the end of the time series, with the label “_potential” (e.g., shaanxi_potential_age_2022_02_07.csv);</li> <li><strong>maximum</strong> age of abandonment over the course of the time series, with the label “_max” (e.g., shaanxi_max_age_2022_02_07.csv);</li> <li><strong>recultivation </strong>periods, corresponding to the lengths of recultivation periods following abandonment, given the label “_recult” (e.g., shaanxi_recult_age_2022_02_07.csv).</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p><strong>This archive includes multiple .zip files, the contents of which are described below:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>age_dts.zip</strong> - Maps of abandonment age (i.e., how long each pixel has been abandoned for, as of that year, also referred to as length, duration, etc.), for each year between 1987-2017 for all 11 sites. These maps are stored as .csv files, where each row is a pixel, the first two columns refer to the x and y coordinates (in terms of longitude and latitude), and subsequent columns contain the abandonment age values for an individual year (where years are labeled with "y" followed by the year, e.g., "y1987"). Maps are given with a latitude and longitude coordinate reference system. Folder contains observed age, potential age (“_potential”), maximum age (“_max”), and recultivation lengths (“_recult”) for all sites. Maximum age .csv files include only three columns: x, y, and the maximum length (i.e., “max age”, in years) for each pixel throughout the entire time series (1987-2017). Files were produced using the custom functions "cc_filter_abn_dt()," “cc_calc_max_age()," “cc_calc_potential_age(),” and “cc_calc_recult_age();” see "_util/_util_functions.R."</li> <li><strong>age_rasters.zip</strong> - Maps of abandonment age (i.e., how long each pixel has been abandoned for), for each year between 1987-2017 for all 11 sites. Maps are stored as .tif files, where each band corresponds to one of the 31 years in our analysis (1987-2017), in ascending order (i.e., the first layer is 1987 and the 31st layer is 2017). Folder contains observed age, potential age (“_potential”), and maximum age (“_max”) rasters for all sites. Maximum age rasters include just one band (“layer”). These rasters match the corresponding .csv files contained in "age_dts.zip.”</li> <li><strong>derived_data.zip</strong> - summary datasets created throughout this analysis, listed below.</li> <li><strong>diff.zip</strong> - .csv files for each of our eleven sites containing the year-to-year lagged differences in abandonment age (i.e., length of time abandoned) for each pixel. The rows correspond to a single pixel of land, and the columns refer to the year the difference is in reference to. These rows do not have longitude or latitude values associated with them; however, rows correspond to the same rows in the .csv files in "input_data.tables.zip" and "age_dts.zip." These files were produced using the custom function "cc_diff_dt()" (much like the base R function "diff()"), contained within the custom function "cc_filter_abn_dt()" (see "_util/_util_functions.R"). Folder contains diff files for observed abandonment, potential abandonment (“_potential”), and recultivation lengths (“_recult”) for all sites.</li> <li><strong>input_dts.zip</strong> - annual land cover maps for eleven sites with four land cover classes (see below), adapted from Yin et al. 2020 <em>Remote Sensing of Environment </em>(<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873</a>)<em>. </em>Like “age_dts,” these maps are stored as .csv files, where each row is a pixel and the first two columns refer to x and y coordinates (in terms of longitude and latitude). Subsequent columns contain the land cover class for an individual year (e.g., "y1987"). Note that these maps were recoded from Yin et al. 2020 so that land cover classification was consistent across sites (see below). This contains two files for each site: the raw land cover maps from Yin et al. 2020 (after recoding), and a “clean” version produced by applying 5- and 8-year temporal filters to the raw input (see custom function “cc_temporal_filter_lc(),” in “_util/_util_functions.R” and “1_prep_r_to_dt.R”). These files correspond to those in "input_rasters.zip," and serve as the primary inputs for the analysis.</li> <li><strong>input_rasters.zip</strong> - annual land cover maps for eleven sites with four land cover classes (see below), adapted from Yin et al. 2020 <em>Remote Sensing of Environment. </em>Maps are stored as ".tif" files, where each band corresponds one of the 31 years in our analysis (1987-2017), in ascending order (i.e., the first layer is 1987 and the 31st layer is 2017). Maps are given with a latitude and longitude coordinate reference system. Note that these maps were recoded so that land cover classes matched across sites (see below). Contains two files for each site: the raw land cover maps (after recoding), and a “clean” version that has been processed with 5- and 8-year temporal filters (see above). These files match those in "input_dts.zip."</li> <li><strong>length.zip</strong> - .csv files containing the length (i.e., age or duration, in years) of each distinct individual period of abandonment at each site. This folder contains length files for observed and potential abandonment, as well as recultivation lengths. Produced using the custom function "cc_filter_abn_dt()" and “cc_extract_length();” see "_util/_util_functions.R."</li> </ul> <p><strong>derived_data.zip</strong> contains the following files:</p> <ul> <li>"<strong>site_df.csv</strong>" - a simple .csv containing descriptive information for each of our eleven sites, along with the original land cover codes used by Yin et al. 2020 (updated so that all eleven sites in how land cover classes were coded; see below).</li> <li><strong>Primary derived datasets </strong>for both observed abandonment (“area_dat”) and potential abandonment (“potential_area_dat”). <ul> <li><strong>area_dat</strong> - Shows the area (in ha) in each land cover class at each site in each year (1987-2017), along with the area of cropland abandoned in each year following a five-year abandonment threshold (abandoned for >=5 years) or no threshold (abandoned for >=1 years). Produced using custom functions "cc_calc_area_per_lc_abn()" via "cc_summarize_abn_dts()". See scripts "cluster/2_analyze_abn.R" and "_util/_util_functions.R."</li> <li><strong>persistence_dat</strong> - A .csv containing the area of cropland abandoned (ha) for a given "cohort" of abandoned cropland (i.e., a group of cropland abandoned in the same year, also called "year_abn") in a specific year. This area is also given as a proportion of the initial area abandoned in each cohort, or the area of each cohort when it was first classified as abandoned at year 5 ("initial_area_abn"). The "age" is given as the number of years since a given cohort of abandoned cropland was last actively cultivated, and "time" is marked relative to the 5th year, when our five-year definition first classifies that land as abandoned (and where the proportion of abandoned land remaining abandoned is 1). Produced using custom functions "cc_calc_persistence()" via "cc_summarize_abn_dts()". See scripts "cluster/2_analyze_abn.R" and "_util/_util_functions.R." This serves as the main input for our linear models of recultivation (“decay”) trajectories.</li> <li><strong>turnover_dat</strong> - A .csv showing the annual gross gain, annual gross loss, and annual net change in the area (in ha) of abandoned cropland at each site in each year of the time series. Produced using custom functions "cc_calc_abn_diff()" via "cc_summarize_abn_dts()" (see "_util/_util_functions.R"), implemented in "cluster/2_analyze_abn.R." This file is only produced for observed abandonment.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Area summary files </strong>(for observed abandonment only) <ul> <li><strong>area_summary_df</strong> - Contains a range of summary values relating to the area of cropland abandonment for each of our eleven sites. All area values are given in hectares (ha) unless stated otherwise. It contains 16 variables as columns, including 1) "site," 2) "total_site_area_ha_2017" - the total site area (ha) in 2017, 3) "cropland_area_1987" - the area in cropland in 1987 (ha), 4) "area_abn_ha_2017" - the area of cropland abandoned as of 2017 (ha), 5) "area_ever_abn_ha" - the total area of those pixels that were abandoned at least once during the time series (corresponding to the area of potential abandonment, as of 2017), 6) "total_crop_extent_ha" - the total area of those pixels that were classified as cropland at least once during the time series, 7) "total_area_abn_remaining_2017" - duplicate of "area_abn_ha_2017," the area abandoned as of 2017 (ha), taken from "area_recult_threshold," 8) "total_initial_area_abn" - the sum of the initial area of each cohort of abandonment when it is first classified as "abandoned," i.e., at the 5 year mark (note that this is cumulative, and because it counts those pixels that were abandoned more than once, it is therefore larger than "area_ever_abn_ha"), taken from "area_recult_threshold" 9) "total_area_abn_recultivated_2017" - the area of abandoned land that was recultivated as of 2017 (cumulatively, i.e., "total_initial_area_abn" - "area_abn_ha_2017"), taken from "area_recult_threshold," 10) "proportion_recultivated" - the proportion of all abandoned cropland (including multiple periods per pixel) that was recultivated by 2017, taken from "area_recult_threshold," 11) "area_2017_as_prop_site" - area abandoned as of 2017 as a proportion of the total site area, 12) "area_2017_as_prop_total_crop" - area abandoned as of 2017 as a proportion of the total crop extent, 13) "area_2017_as_prop_crop87" - area abandoned as of 2017 as a proportion of cropland area in 1987, 14) "area_ever_abn_as_prop_site" - area ever abandoned as a proportion of the total site area, 15) "area_ever_abn_as_prop_total_crop" - area ever abandoned as a proportion of the total crop extent, 16) "area_ever_abn_as_prop_crop87" - area ever abandoned as a proportion of cropland area in 1987. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> <li><strong>area_recult_threshold</strong> - Contains data on the proportion of observed abandoned cropland area that is recultivated by the end of our time series. This includes the area of abandoned cropland as of 2017 ("total_area_abn_remaining_2017") and the sum of the initial area of each cohort of abandonment when it is first classified as abandoned (at year 5; "total_initial_area_abn"). This "total_initial_area_abn" is cumulative, and allows for pixels that were abandoned multiple times during the time series to be counted multiple times. The difference between these two columns yields the "total_area_abn_recultivated_2017," which in turn is used to calculate the "proportion_recultivated," and the (ascending) "order" of sites based on this proportion. This file includes recultivation stats for each site for three abandonment definitions: 5, 7, and 10 years. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> <li><strong>abn_lc_area_2017</strong> - Contains the number of pixels and corresponding area (in ha) of abandoned cropland in the year 2017 at each site, according to the land cover class (either woody vegetation [2], or herbaceous vegetation [4]) and the age in 2017 (5 to 30 years). See script "cluster/6_lc_of_abn.R."</li> <li><strong>abn_prop_lc_2017 </strong>- Contains the number of pixels and corresponding area (ha) of cropland abandoned in the year 2017 in each land cover type (woody vegetation [2], or herbaceous vegetation [4]). It also shows this area as a proportion of the total area abandoned at each site (i.e., in either land cover class: 2 or 4). See script "cluster/6_lc_of_abn.R."</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Carbon</strong> <ul> <li><strong>carbon_df </strong>– contains the observed and potential carbon accumulation in abandoned croplands in each site in each year (in Mg C), for two abandonment thresholds: 5 years (our default abandonment definition) and 1 year (i.e., no threshold). Each data point corresponds to one of two scenarios (“type” column), either “observed” or “potential.” Carbon accumulation figures are for both the sum of forest and soil carbon at each site in a given year. Carbon accumulation is listed in three columns: 1) “C_up_to_20” contains the total carbon accumulated in those abandoned croplands with abandonment durations between 5 and 20 years. 2) “C_21_30” contains the total carbon accumulation in croplands with durations between 21 and 30 years, which are differentiated in order to account for non-linear carbon accumulation rates in soils over time, and 3) “total_C_Mg” contains the sum of the previous two columns, representing the total carbon accumulated across all abandoned croplands in each year.</li> <li><strong>soc_mean</strong> – contains mean soil organic carbon accumulation rates for years 1-20 and years 21-80, derived from Sanderman et al. 2020 (in Mg C; <a href="https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HA17D3">https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HA17D3</a>). These values correspond to accumulation rates in croplands upon abandonment and regeneration to natural vegetation (Sanderman et al. 2020’s “rewilding” scenario). These mean values are calculated across those pixels identified as cropland by Sanderman et al. 2020 at each site. Mean values in year 20 and 80 are contained in columns “mean_soc_20” and “mean_soc_80” respectively, and the annualized rate over the first 20 years and the subsequent years 21 through 80 are contained in columns “mean_annual_soc_1_20” and “mean_annual_soc_21_80” respectively.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Decay model data</strong> – two R data files containing data products for our linear models of abandonment recultivation trajectories. <ul> <li><strong>decay_endpoints_files</strong> – an R data file (.rds) containing seven data products produced as part of our common endpoint analysis, which calculated mean trajectories for each site across a range of common endpoints, ensuring that means were based on coefficient estimates derived from a consistent number of observations for each cohort. These files are: <ul> <li><strong>common_endpoint_dat – </strong>a .csv containing subsets of “persistence_dat” for each “endpoint” (7 through 29).</li> <li><strong>endpoint_n – </strong>a .csv describing, for each endpoint, the corresponding number of observations per cohort (“n_obs”), the number of cohorts (“n_cohorts”), the total number of observations across cohorts included (“total_obs”), and the cohorts that meet the endpoint threshold (“cohorts”).</li> <li><strong>coef_l3_endpoints – </strong>corresponding model coefficients for our primary model (“l3”) parameterized by the range of subsets across endpoints.</li> <li><strong>augment_endpoints – </strong>fitted values (i.e., model predictions) for linear models produced across the full range of endpoint subsets.</li> <li><strong>fitted_endpoints – </strong>a simplified .csv containing the mean linear and log coefficients for each site at each endpoint, and the corresponding predicted proportion remaining abandoned through time (based on the “age,” or duration, of abandonment).</li> <li><strong>time_to_endpoints – </strong>a .csv containing, for mean trajectories for each endpoint at each site, the estimated time required for a given amount of abandoned cropland in a cohort to be recultivated (deciles, 10% through 100%).</li> <li><strong>endpoint_half_lives – </strong>a .csv containing the half-lives calculated for the mean trajectories for each endpoint at each site.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>decay_mod_archive</strong> - an R data file (.rds) containing eleven data products derived from linear models of abandonment recultivation ("decay"): <ul> <li><strong>lm_mega_lin_log_lin_l</strong> – the primary linear model produced in our analysis. This model is referred to as “lin_log_lin” (or “l3”) because the model predicts linear persistence (“lin”) as a function of a log term of time (“log”) and a linear term of time (“lin”). “mega” refers to the fact that this model is run for the full dataset, pooled across all 11 sites.</li> <li><strong>coef_l3_mega</strong> – a .csv containing model coefficients for our primary linear model of recultivation (“lin_log_lin”, or “l3”), with a single row each for the linear term of time and the log term of time, for 26 cohorts at 11 sites.</li> <li><strong>mean_coef_l3_mega</strong> – a data frame containing the mean coefficient values for the log and linear terms of time across cohorts at each site. This also contains the mean of the low and high coefficient estimates, based on the 95% confidence interval.</li> <li><strong>half_lives_all_cohorts_l3</strong> – half-lives calculated for each cohort at each site, for our primary model.</li> <li><strong>half_life_mean_coefs_l3</strong> – half-lives calculated based on the mean trajectory for each site (based on the mean log coefficients and mean linear coefficients across all cohorts), for our primary model.</li> <li><strong>mod_AIC_mega</strong> – Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) values for all tested model specifications.</li> <li><strong>fitted_combo</strong> – fitted values (i.e., model predictions) for our primary model (“l3”) and a series of alternative model specifications (“l3_trim” – excluding cohorts with fewer than 5 observations; “lin_log” – a model including only one log time term; “log2_lin” – in which the log of persistence is predicted by log and linear time terms; and “l3_no_cohort” – our primary model, predicting linear persistence as a function of log time and linear time, but without cohort-level fixed effects).</li> <li><strong>time_to_combo</strong> – contains the estimated time required for a certain amount of abandoned cropland in a cohort to be recultivated (deciles, 10% through 100%). See script "2_decay_models.Rmd." These values are calculated for a range of alternative model specifications ("l3_trim", “lin_log”, "log2_lin", and "l3_no_cohort"; see above).</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Length data</strong> – includes “_distill_df” files and “mean_length_df” files for observed, potential, and recultivation. <ul> <li><strong>length_distill_df</strong> - .csvs containing the number ("freq") of abandonment periods of a specific "length" of time (i.e., age) at each site over the course of the entire time series. Derived from the "length" files in "length.zip." See script "cluster/5_distill_lengths.R."</li> <li><strong>mean_length_df</strong> - .csvs with the mean, median, and standard deviation, for each site, for both "all" lengths or just the "max" length per pixel, and for a range of abandonment definitions (1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years). Derived from "length_distill_df." See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Duration summary files</strong> – includes “summary_stats_all_sites” and “summary_stats_all_sites_pooled,” for observed and potential abandonment, and recultivation periods following abandonment. <ul> <li><strong>“summary_stats_all_sites”</strong> - A simple .csv derived from "mean_length_df" files containing summary stats across the 11 sites. This includes the mean of the mean abandonment duration ("length", in years) for each of our 11 sites ("mean_of_means"), the standard deviation of these site mean abandonment lengths ("sd_of_means"), the mean of the standard deviation at each site ("mean_of_sds"), the mean median ("mean_of_medians"), and the mean number of abandonment periods ("mean_n_abn_periods"). Note that length "all" indicates that these stats account for all periods (including multiple per pixel), rather than just the max duration per pixel. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> <li><strong>“summary_stats_all_sites_pooled”</strong> - A summary .csv similar to "summary_stats_all_sites," but calculated by pooling all distinct periods of abandonment across all eleven sites, and then calculating the mean, median, and standard deviation of abandonment duration. See script "1_summary_stats.Rmd."</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Comparing annual approach to identifying abandonment to a two-timepoint (“2yr”) approach:</strong> <ul> <li><strong>abn_2yr_ages_df</strong> - Contains the age of former croplands identified as "abandoned" using a two-timepoint method (i.e., 2017 - 1987), where age values (as of 2017) are derived from our map of abandonment identified using the full annual time series. This includes the area in hectares (ha), in each age class (along with the number of pixels), at each of our 11 sites. This dataset is used to calculate the percent of cropland "abandonment" identified using the two-year method that is actually too "young," i.e., less than 5 years old, and therefore not truly abandonment according to our five-year abandonment definition</li> <li><strong>abn_2yr_overestimation</strong> - Compares the area (in hectares) of cropland abandonment at each site identified with our full annual time series (and a five-year abandonment definition) and the "abandonment" identified using a two-timepoint method (2017-1987). This also includes the percent difference in area between the two methods, the Jaccard similarity of the areas identified as abandonment, and the percent of "young" (i.e., <5-year-old) "abandonment" identified by the two-timepoint method.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Input land cover maps:</strong></p> <p>As noted, the file "input_rasters.zip" contain the raw annual land cover maps for eleven sites generated by:</p> <blockquote> <p>Yin, H., A. Brandão, J. Buchner, D. Helmers, B. G. Iuliano, N. E. Kimambo, K. E. Lewińska, E. Razenkova, A. Rizayeva, N. Rogova, S. A. Spawn, Y. Xie, and V. C. Radeloff. 2020. Monitoring cropland abandonment with Landsat time series. <em>Remote Sensing of Environment</em> 246:111873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873</p> </blockquote> <p>These land cover maps served as raw inputs for this project and form the basis of the analysis.</p> <p>All land cover maps have a resolution of 30-m and exist for each year from 1987 through 2017. The exceptions are Nebraska / Wyoming (1986-2018) and Wisconsin (1987-2018); these additional years were excluded from our analysis of abandonment duration.</p> <p><strong>Land cover categories in these maps are coded as follows:</strong></p> <ol> <li>Non-vegetated area (e.g., water, urban, barren land)</li> <li>Woody vegetation (e.g., forests)</li> <li>Cropland</li> <li>Herbaceous vegetation (e.g., grassland)</li> </ol> <p><strong>Site file names correspond to the following geographic locations:</strong></p> <ul> <li>belarus = Vitebsk, Belarus / Smolensk, Russia</li> <li>bosnia_herzegovina = Bosnia & Herzegovina</li> <li>chongqing = Chongqing, China</li> <li>goias = Goiás, Brazil</li> <li>iraq = Iraq</li> <li>mato_grosso = Mato Grosso, Brazil</li> <li>nebraska = Nebraska / Wyoming, USA</li> <li>orenburg = Orenburg, Russia / Uralsk, Kazakhstan</li> <li>shaanxi = Shaanxi/Shanxi, China</li> <li>volgograd = Volgograd, Russia</li> <li>wisconsin = Wisconsin, USA</li> </ul> <p>This dataset is minimally altered from Yin et al. 2020. However, land cover codes were updated for five sites (Iraq, Nebraska/Wyoming, Orenburg/Uralsk, Volgograd, and Wisconsin) in order to maintain consistency in how land cover was coded across all sites. The original land cover codes (matching Yin et al. 2020) are described in the file "site_df.csv" and are as follows:</p> <ol> <li>Iraq: 1 Non-vegetated; 2 Cropland; 3 Woody; 4 Herbaceous</li> <li>Nebraska / Wyoming (USA): 1 Cropland; 2 Woody; 3 Non-vegetated; 4 Herbaceous</li> <li>Orenburg, Russia / Uralsk, Kazakhstan: 1 Non-vegetated; 2 Cropland; 3 Herbaceous; 4 Woody</li> <li>Volgograd (Russia): 1 Non-vegetated; 2 Cropland; 3 Herbaceous; 4 Woody</li> <li>Wisconsin (USA): 1 Cropland; 2 Herbaceous; 3 Woody; 4 Non-vegetated</li> </ol>
Data for: A severe landslide event in the Alpine foreland under possible future climate and land-use changes
<p>Data underlying manuscript and supplementary figures of the corresponding publication, as well as the scripts to conduct the final analyses.</p>
Theia OSO Land Cover Map 2020
<p>Land cover map of France based on Sentinel-2 satellite images with iota² chain (https://framagit.org/iota2-project/iota2/)</p>
Theia OSO Land Cover Map 2019
<p>Land cover map of France based on Sentinel-2 satellite images with iota² chain (https://framagit.org/iota2-project/iota2/)</p>
Theia OSO Land Cover Map 2021
<p>Land cover map of France based on Sentinel-2 satellite images with iota² chain (https://framagit.org/iota2-project/iota2/)</p>
Improving ERA5-Land soil temperature in permafrost regions
<p>Cao et al. (2020) have previously reported a warm bias in ERA5-Land soil temperature in permafrost regions that was supposedly being caused by an underestimation of the snow density. This study evaluates a new multi-layer snow scheme in the land surface scheme of ERA5-Land, i.e., HTESSEL, with a revised snow densification parametrization. The revised HTESSEL significantly improved the representation of soil temperature in permafrost regions compared to ERA5-Land.</p> <p>The original simulation data, on the Octahedral reduced gaussian grid, were interpolated on a 0.25/0.25 regular lat/lon grid (global) and aggregated in daily mean from 2000-01-01 to 2018-12-31. More information on the dataset is contained in info_dataset.txt</p>
ERA5-Land weekly: Surface temperature, weekly time series for Europe at 1 km resolution (2016 - 2020)
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Surface temperature:<br> Temperature of the surface of the Earth. The skin temperature is the theoretical temperature that is required to satisfy the surface energy balance. It represents the temperature of the uppermost surface layer, which has no heat capacity and so can respond instantaneously to changes in surface fluxes.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (https://chelsa-climate.org/). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>The spatially enhanced daily ERA5-Land data has been aggregated on a weekly basis (starting from Saturday) for the time period 2016 - 2020. Data available is the weekly average of daily averages, the weekly minimum of daily minima and the weekly maximum of daily maxima of surface temperature.</p> <p>File naming:<br> Average of daily average: <code>era5_land_ts_avg_weekly_YYYY_MM_DD.tif</code><br> Max of daily max: <code>era5_land_ts_max_weekly_YYYY_MM_DD.tif</code><br> Min of daily min: <code>era5_land_ts_min_weekly_YYYY_MM_DD.tif</code></p> <p>The date in the file name determines the start day of the week (Saturday).</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> °C * 10 Example: Value 302 = 30.2 °C</p> <p>The QML or SLD style files can be used for visualization of the temperature layers.</p> <p>Coordinate reference system:<br> ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (EPSG:3035) (EPSG:3035)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82N<br> south: 18S<br> west: -32W<br> east: 61E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 1 km</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> weekly</p> <p>Time period:<br> 01/01/2016 - 12/31/2020</p> <p>Format: GeoTIFF</p> <p>Representation type: Grid</p> <p>Software used:<br> GRASS 8.0</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/api/v2/terms/static/licence-to-use-copernicus-products.pdf">https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/api/v2/terms/static/licence-to-use-copernicus-products.pdf</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Other resources:<br> https://data.mundialis.de/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/601ea08c-0768-4af3-a8fa-7da25fb9125b</p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Contact:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, info@mundialis.de</p>
ERA5-Land weekly: Air temperature at 2 meter above surface, weekly time series for Europe at 1 km resolution (2016 - 2020)
<p>Overview:<br> ERA5-Land is a reanalysis dataset providing a consistent view of the evolution of land variables over several decades at an enhanced resolution compared to ERA5. ERA5-Land has been produced by replaying the land component of the ECMWF ERA5 climate reanalysis. Reanalysis combines model data with observations from across the world into a globally complete and consistent dataset using the laws of physics. Reanalysis produces data that goes several decades back in time, providing an accurate description of the climate of the past.</p> <p>Air temperature (2 m):<br> Temperature of air at 2m above the surface of land, sea or in-land waters. 2m temperature is calculated by interpolating between the lowest model level and the Earth's surface, taking account of the atmospheric conditions.</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original hourly ERA5-Land data has been spatially enhanced from 0.1 degree to 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m) spatial resolution by image fusion with CHELSA data (V1.2) (https://chelsa-climate.org/). For each day we used the corresponding monthly long-term average of CHELSA. The aim was to use the fine spatial detail of CHELSA and at the same time preserve the general regional pattern and fine temporal detail of ERA5-Land. The steps included aggregation and enhancement, specifically:<br> 1. spatially aggregate CHELSA to the resolution of ERA5-Land<br> 2. calculate difference of ERA5-Land - aggregated CHELSA<br> 3. interpolate differences with a Gaussian filter to 30 arc seconds<br> 4. add the interpolated differences to CHELSA</p> <p>The spatially enhanced daily ERA5-Land data has been aggregated on a weekly basis starting from Saturday for the time period 2016 - 2020.<br> Data available is the weekly average of daily averages, the weekly minimum of daily minima and the weekly maximum of daily maxima of air temperature (2 m).</p> <p>File naming:<br> Average of daily average: <code>era5_land_t2m_avg_weekly_YYYY_MM_DD.tif</code><br> Max of daily max: <code>era5_land_t2m_max_weekly_YYYY_MM_DD.tif</code><br> Min of daily min: <code>era5_land_t2m_min_weekly_YYYY_MM_DD.tif</code></p> <p>The date in the file name determines the start day of the week (Saturday).</p> <p>Pixel value:<br> °C * 10<br> Example: Value 44 = 4.4 °C</p> <p>The QML or SLD style files can be used for visualization of the temperature layers.</p> <p>Coordinate reference system:<br> ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (EPSG:3035) (EPSG:3035)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 1km</p> <p>Temporal resolution:<br> weekly</p> <p>Time period:<br> 01/01/2016 - 12/31/2020</p> <p>Format: GeoTIFF</p> <p>Representation type: Grid</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0 (r.resamp.stats -w; r.relief)</p> <p>Lineage:<br> Dataset has been processed from original Copernicus Climate Data Store (ERA5-Land) data sources. As auxiliary data CHELSA climate data has been used.</p> <p>Original ERA5-Land dataset license:<br> <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/api/v2/terms/static/licence-to-use-copernicus-products.pdf">https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/api/v2/terms/static/licence-to-use-copernicus-products.pdf</a></p> <p>CHELSA climatologies (V1.2):<br> Data used: Karger D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E, Linder, H.P., Kessler, M. (2018): Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Dryad digital repository. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4">http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5061/dryad.kd1d4</a><br> Original peer-reviewed publication: Karger, D.N., Conrad, O., Böhner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W., Zimmermann, N.E., Linder, P., Kessler, M. (2017): Climatologies at high resolution for the Earth land surface areas. Scientific Data. 4 170122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122</a></p> <p>Other resources:<br> <a href="https://data.mundialis.de/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/601ea08c-0768-4af3-a8fa-7da25fb9125b">https://data.mundialis.de/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/601ea08c-0768-4af3-a8fa-7da25fb9125b</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p>Contact:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, info@mundialis.de</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.