Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,243
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
4,243 results for “seasonality”
Aqueous geochemical measurements and speciation calculations with concurrent copper resistance gene counts from sediment metagenomes over a seasonal cycle from 2015 to 2016 on Silver Bow Creek and Blacktail Creek near Butte, MT
<p>This dataset contains information from concurrently gathered geochemical and metagenomic samples collected from Silver Bow Creek and Blacktail Creek near Butte, MT (SBC/BC) during 2015 and 2016. SBC/BC is recovering from metal contamination related to extensive mining in the area. Full geochemical measurements, geochemical speciation calculations, and gene counts of sequences mapping to copper resistance genes using MG-RAST are included. </p>
Seasonal Terrestrial Water Load Modulation of Seismicity at the Southeastern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau Constrained by GNSS and GRACE Data
<p>Data Set S1. The earthquake catalog is used to decluster aftershocks and background events, and the time range is from July 2004 to July 2021. This data set includes 672585 events in the study area.</p> <p>Data Set S2. Focal mechanism solutions of M ≥ 4 earthquakes at the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. The data set includes 634 solutions of earthquakes M ≥ 4, and the time range is from 2009 to 2017.</p>
Dataset from Holding et al. (2019)––Seasonal and spatial patterns of primary production in a high latitude fjord
<p>Unprecedented melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) is impacting the coastal ocean, and its effects on fjord ecology remain understudied. It has been suggested that as glaciers retreat, primary production regimes may be altered, rendering fjords less productive. Here we present data from the paper Holding et al. (2019). Seasonal and spatial patterns of primary production in a high-latitude fjord affected by Greenland Ice Sheet run-off. <em>Biogeosciences</em>, <em>16</em>(19), 3777-3792, /doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3777-2019. This paper investigates patterns of primary productivity in a northeast Greenland fjord (Young Sound, 74°N), which receives run-off from the GrIS via land-terminating glaciers. This dataset includes measures of size fractioned primary production and chlorophyll <em>a </em>biomass, as well as CTD data and biochemical parameters. Furthermore, primary production was measured using photosynthesis v. irradiance (PI) curves, thus PI curve parameters are also available. The data were taken during the ice-free season along a spatial gradient of meltwater influence. </p> <p>We thank Egon Frandsen, Kunuk Lennert, and Ivali Lennert for excellent assistance during fieldwork. This research has beensupported by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency’s programme for Arctic research (DANCEA) (grant no. MST-112-0023), The Carlsberg Foundation (grant no. 2013_01_0532), the Norwegian Research Council (Mi- croPolar) (grant no. RCN 225956), and the European Commission, H2020 Research Infrastructures (GrIS-Melt (grant no. 752325) and INTAROS (grant no. 727890)). </p>
Copernicus EMS fire activations delimitations (2012 - 2020) rasterised at 30m and aggregated per year and season
<p>This dataset was created as part of the <a href="https://opendatascience.eu/">Geo-harmonizer project</a>, with the scope of making open data easier to access. It contains all the fire activations (forest fire, wild fire, wildfire) mapped by the<a href="https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/list-of-activations-rapid"> Copernicus Emergency Rapid Mapping Service</a> between 2012 and 2020. To obtain these GeoTIFFs, the vector data packages from CEMS were individually downloaded, rasterized and mosaicked per year and season, resampled at 30-m and reprojected to <a href="https://epsg.io/3035">EPSG 3035: ETRS89-extended / LAEA Europe</a>. If no CEMS fire activation was identified in a specific year and season, the raster was not created. The rasters are provided as COG files, type=16Int, nodata value is 255.</p> <p>To allow an easier and faster search through all 2012 - 2020 CEMS fire activations, we have prepared a point vector layer (geojson) containing one point for each fire activation area of interest with the following attributes attached: CEMS identification number <ems_id>, area of interest defined by CEMS <ems_aoi>, URL link to the CEMS activation <ems_link>, year of the event <year_start>, <year_end> , <season> and the name of the <geo_harmonizer_raster> where the 30m rasterised delimitations of the burned areas of the corresponding fire activation can be found. </p> <p>For any additional questions regarding the data please contact the author at codrina.ilie[at]terrasigna.com.</p> <p>The Copernicus Emergency Rapid Mapping Service data access policy is available <a href="https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/sites/default/files/files/CopernicusEMS-Data_and_Dissemination_Policy.pdf">here</a>.</p>
Data from: Understanding the Influence of Check Dam and Season on Habitat Use to Develop Habitat Suitability Criteria for Overwintering Tadpoles of Nanorana spp.
<p>Dataset for the article: Understanding the Influence of Check Dam and Season on Habitat Use to Develop Habitat Suitability Criteria for Overwintering Tadpoles of <em>Nanorana</em> spp.</p> <p>See readme.txt for details.</p>
Great Britain (GB) Domestic Electricity Usage by Low Carbon Technology by Season
<p><strong>Important</strong>: As an research not-for-profit organisation, if you found this dataset useful we would appreciate your time in filling out <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfqCAoQt4AzuGH8Th5tJjnkGP956Fgc6O8T6wJaM7Nhd_nRdg/viewform?usp=pp_url&entry.1276408097=10.5281/zenodo.6576108">this short survey</a>.</p> <p> </p> <p>This dataset contains 3 aggregate datasets from the electricity smart meter data of over 25,000 customers in Great Britain (GB) from March 2021 - March 2022.</p> <p>For each consumer, we know (via a survey) what low carbon technologies (LCTs) they own. The potential LCT options are: Solar PV, Heat Pump (Air Source, or Ground Source), Electric Vehicle, Battery, Electric Storage Heaters.</p> <p>For simplicity, this dataset contains only customers with one type of LCT (with the exception of Solar PV, where we include Solar PV + Battery customers as is common in GB). We do not include customers with multiple LCTs (for example home battery + EV)</p> <p>We include quantiles of usage for each half hour (the "profile") for each type of LCT ownership "archetype", both overall (when season=None) and by season. As is common in the literature, we normalise by the square meterage of the house using open EPC data in GB (https://epc.opendatacommunities.org/) to get the watt hours per square meter. You can also find the raw, unnormalised, kwh values by quantile in this release. These two datasets have the quantiles for each half hour period. In addition, we release the daily quantiles of electricity consumption, in kwh per square meterage, by LCT type.</p> <p>In summary the data we are releasing, aggregated over 25,000 customers over 1 year of usage from March 2021 - March 2020 is:</p> <ul> <li>daily_elec_consumption_quantiles_by_lct_ownership.csv - The daily quantiles of usage [kWh/m2] by LCT</li> <li>lct_elec_consumption_profiles.csv - The half hourly quantiles of usage [Wh/m2] by LCT by season</li> <li>lct_elec_consumption_profiles_kwh.csv - The half hourly quantiles of usage [kWh] by LCT by season</li> </ul> <p>We believe this data will be useful for modelling efforts, as customers with different types of LCTs use energy at different times of the day, and by different amounts daily. By releasing this data openly, we hope forecasting scenarios for the future energy system are more accurate. We have a supporting blog post on our website at https://www.centrefornetzero.org/res/lessons-from-early-adopters-electricity-consumption-profiles/.</p>
Data for: Seasonal dynamics of faunal diversity and population ecology in an estuarine seagrass bed
<p>These are the data used in the analyses described in the paper titled "Seasonal dynamics of faunal diversity and population ecology in an estuarine seagrass bed", accepted at Estuaries and Coasts. We acknowledge the tangata whenua for the rohe in which these data were collected, Ngāi Tārewa and Ngāti Īrakehu. We thank the Akaroa Taiāpure for their support of this research.</p> <p>The data included are:</p> <p>Raw count data of taxa for each tow, associated with additional metadata including the date of collection, tow coordinates, and estimated seagrass cover (MonthlyRawSampling_Duvauchelle_2020.csv). This data was put through cleaning steps outlined in the file docs/dataCleaning.Rmd prior to being used in any analyses.</p> <p>The cleaned community composition data (cleanedCommunity.csv), output from <a href="https://github.com/spflanagan/ecology-duvauchelle/blob/main/docs/dataCleaning.Rmd">docs/dataCleaning.Rmd</a> and used in the downstream community and population analyses.</p> <p>The GPS coordinates for the tows (gpsdat.csv). These were extracted from the raw data in the data cleaning process.</p> <p>NZsyngnathids_measurements.csv contains the measurements of the pipefish from images. These data also underwent a cleaning process documented in <a href="https://github.com/spflanagan/ecology-duvauchelle/blob/main/docs/dataCleaning.Rmd">docs/dataCleaning.Rmd</a>.</p> <p>The cleaned pipefish trait data (pipefishTraits.csv), output from docs/dataCleaning.Rmd and used in the downstream population analysis documented in <a href="https://github.com/spflanagan/ecology-duvauchelle/blob/main/docs/populationAnalyses.Rmd">docs/populationAnalyses.Rmd</a>.<br> </p>
SeasoNet: A Seasonal Scene Classification, Segmentation and Retrieval Dataset for Satellite Imagery over Germany
<p>This dataset consists of 1,759,830 multi-spectral image patches from the Sentinel-2 mission, annotated with image- and pixel-level land cover and land usage labels from the German land cover model LBM-DE2018 with land cover classes based on the CORINE Land Cover database (CLC) 2018. It includes pixel synchronous examples from each of the four seasons, plus an additional snowy set, spanning the time from April 2018 to February 2019. The patches were taken from 519,547 unique locations, covering the whole surface area of Germany, with each patch covering an area of 1.2km x 1.2km. The set is split into two overlapping grids, consisting of roughly 880,000 samples each, which are shifted by half the patch size in both dimensions. The images in each of the both grids themselves do not overlap.</p> <p><strong>Contents</strong></p> <p>Each sample includes:</p> <ul> <li>3 10m resolution bands (RGB), 120px x 120px</li> <li>1 10m resolution band (infrared), 120px x 120px</li> <li>6 20m resolution bands, 60px x 60px</li> <li>2 60m resolution bands, 20xp x 20px</li> <li>1 pixel-level label map</li> <li>2 binary masks for cloud and snow coverage</li> <li>2 binary masks for easy and medium segmentation difficulties, marks areas <300px and <100px respectively</li> <li>1 JSON-file containing additional meta-information</li> </ul> <p>The meta.csv contains the following information about each sample:</p> <ul> <li>Which season it belongs to</li> <li>Which of the two grids it belongs to</li> <li>Coordinates of the patch center</li> <li>Whether it was acquired from Sentinel-2 Satellite A or B</li> <li>Date and time of image acquisition</li> <li>Snow and cloud coverage percentages</li> <li>Image-level multi-class labels</li> <li>Three additional image-level urbanization labels, based on the center pixel (details below)</li> <li>The path to the sample</li> </ul> <p><strong>Classes</strong></p> <table> <thead> <tr> <th scope="col">ID</th> <th scope="col">Class</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>Continuous urban fabric</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2</td> <td>Discontinuous urban fabric</td> </tr> <tr> <td>3</td> <td>Industrial or commercial units</td> </tr> <tr> <td>4</td> <td>Road and rail networks and associated land</td> </tr> <tr> <td>5</td> <td>Port areas</td> </tr> <tr> <td>6</td> <td>Airports</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7</td> <td>Mineral extraction sites</td> </tr> <tr> <td>8</td> <td>Dump sites</td> </tr> <tr> <td>9</td> <td>Construction sites</td> </tr> <tr> <td>10</td> <td>Green urban areas</td> </tr> <tr> <td>11</td> <td>Sport and leisure facilities</td> </tr> <tr> <td>12</td> <td>Non-irrigated arable land</td> </tr> <tr> <td>13</td> <td>Vineyards</td> </tr> <tr> <td>14</td> <td>Fruit trees and berry plantations</td> </tr> <tr> <td>15</td> <td>Pastures</td> </tr> <tr> <td>16</td> <td>Broad-leaved forest</td> </tr> <tr> <td>17</td> <td>Coniferous forest</td> </tr> <tr> <td>18</td> <td>Mixed forest</td> </tr> <tr> <td>19</td> <td>Natural grasslands</td> </tr> <tr> <td>20</td> <td>Moors and heathland</td> </tr> <tr> <td>21</td> <td>Transitional woodland/shrub</td> </tr> <tr> <td>22</td> <td>Beaches, dunes, sands</td> </tr> <tr> <td>23</td> <td>Bare rock</td> </tr> <tr> <td>24</td> <td>Sparsely vegetated areas</td> </tr> <tr> <td>25</td> <td>Inland marshes</td> </tr> <tr> <td>26</td> <td>Peat bogs</td> </tr> <tr> <td>27</td> <td>Salt marshes</td> </tr> <tr> <td>28</td> <td>Intertidal flats</td> </tr> <tr> <td>29</td> <td>Water courses</td> </tr> <tr> <td>30</td> <td>Water bodies</td> </tr> <tr> <td>31</td> <td>Coastal lagoons</td> </tr> <tr> <td>32</td> <td>Estuaries</td> </tr> <tr> <td>33</td> <td>Sea and ocean</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Urbanization classes</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>SLRAUM</strong> <ul> <li>0: None</li> <li>1: Ländlicher Raum (~ rural area)</li> <li>2: Städtischer Raum (~ urban area)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>RTYP3</strong> <ul> <li>0: None</li> <li>1: Ländliche Regionen (~ rural areas)</li> <li>2: Regionen mit Verstädterungsansätzen (~ urbanizing areas)</li> <li>3: Städtische Regionen (~ urban areas)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>KTYP4</strong> <ul> <li>0: None</li> <li>1: Dünn besiedelte ländliche Kreise</li> <li>2: Kreisfreie Großstädte</li> <li>3: Ländliche Kreise mit Verdichtungsansätzen</li> <li>4: Städtische Kreise</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>Further information on the urbanization classes can be found here:</p> <p><strong>SLRAUM</strong></p> <p><a href="https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/kreise/staedtischer-laendlicher-raum/kreistypen.html">https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/kreise/staedtischer-laendlicher-raum/kreistypen.html</a></p> <p><strong>RTYP3</strong></p> <p><a href="https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/regionen/siedlungsstrukturelle-regionstypen/regionstypen.html">https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/regionen/siedlungsstrukturelle-regionstypen/regionstypen.html</a></p> <p><strong>KTYP4</strong></p> <p><a href="https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/kreise/siedlungsstrukturelle-kreistypen/kreistypen.html">https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/raumbeobachtung/Raumabgrenzungen/deutschland/kreise/siedlungsstrukturelle-kreistypen/kreistypen.html</a></p> <p><strong>License of landcover model</strong></p> <p>Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie</p> <p>dl-de/by-2-0 from <a href="https://www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0">https://www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0</a></p> <p>© GeoBasis-DE / <strong>BKG</strong> 2022</p> <p><strong>Source of landcover model</strong></p> <p><a href="https://gdz.bkg.bund.de/index.php/default/catalog/product/view/id/1071/s/corine-land-cover-5-ha-stand-2018-clc5-2018/">https://gdz.bkg.bund.de/index.php/default/catalog/product/view/id/1071/s/corine-land-cover-5-ha-stand-2018-clc5-2018/</a></p>
Seasonal ecophysiology of Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyceae) in the Northern Baltic Sea
<p>This dataset contains ecophysiological measurements of brown algae <em>Fucus vesiculosus</em> and environmental variables, measured in different seasons in 2017 in the Northern Baltic Sea, SW Finland. More specifically, the measured parameters include in situ chlorophyll <em>a</em> fluorescence: F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>, maximum relative electron transport rate, and quantum yield of photochemistry. Carbon and nitrogen content, carbon:nitrogen ratio and chlorophyll <em>a</em> and <em>c</em> content were determined in the laboratory. Environmental parameters monitored include in situ irradiance, temperature, salinity, alkalinity, DIC, pCO<sub>2</sub>, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>, CO<sub>2</sub>, seawater nitrogen (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) and phosphorus (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3-</sup>). Measurements were conducted in February, May, July, September and November in two sites, with additional three sites sampled in July. Irradiance was measured with 1 meter depth intervals from the surface. Irradiance values in the data are irradiances at <em>F. vesiculosus</em> sampling depths in each site, estimated with linear regression from the irradiance and depth data. F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> values for sites Spikarna, Ekö and Björnholmen in July were imputed from other variables using R package "Amelia". </p>
Data from: Seasonal variation in wildlife roadkills in plantations and tropical rainforest in the Anamalai Hills, Western Ghats, India
<p>This dataset contains animal roadkill data (2011-13) from the Valparai Plateau and Anamalai Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats, India. Occurrence records were gathered in the field by researchers of the <a href="https://www.ncf-india.org">Nature Conservation Foundation, India</a>. The dataset corresponds to the following publication:</p> <p>Jeganathan, P., Mudappa, D., Kumar, M. A., and Raman, T. R. S. 2018. <a href="https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/619-626">Seasonal variation in wildlife roadkills in plantations and tropical rainforest in the Anamalai Hills, Western Ghats, India</a>. <em>Current Science</em> 114(3): 619-626. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v114/i03/619-626</p> <p>CONTACT #1<br> 1. Name: P. Jeganathan<br> 2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br> 3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br> 4. Email address: jegan@ncf-india.org<br> 5. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0238-0655</p> <p>CONTACT #2<br> 1. Name: Divya Mudappa<br> 2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br> 3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br> 4. Email address: divya@ncf-india.org<br> 5. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-4826</p> <p>CONTACT #3<br> 1. Name: M. Ananda Kumar<br> 2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br> 3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br> 4. Email address: anand@ncf-india.org<br> 5. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-1314</p> <p>CONTACT #4<br> 1. Name: T. R. Shankar Raman<br> 2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br> 3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br> 4. Email address: trsr@ncf-india.org<br> 5. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-3953</p> <p><strong>Keywords: </strong>tropical rainforest, plantations, Anamalai Hills, animal roadkill, linear infrastructure intrusions, highways, road ecology, animal-vehicle collisions </p> <p><strong>Geographic Coverage:</strong><br> 1. Location/Study Area: Valparai Plateau, Tamil Nadu, India; Anamalai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India<br> 2. GPS coordinates: Valparai Plateau (10°15'- 10°22'N, 76°52' - 76°59'E); Anamalai Tiger Reserve (10°12' - 10°35'N, 76°49' - 77°24'E)</p> <p><strong>Temporal Coverage:</strong><br> 1. Begins: 2011-06-01 (Year, Month, Day)<br> 2. Ends: 2013-05-31 (Year, Month, Day)</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong></p> <p>Methods involved repeated surveys along the road routes searching for roadkills and habitat sampling as described in <a href="https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/619-626">Jeganathan et al. (2018),<em> Current Science</em> 114(3): 619-626</a>, DOI: 10.18520/cs/v114/i03/619-626</p> <p><strong>Files included:</strong></p> <p>Besides this 00_README.txt file, the dataset includes the following six files as explained below:<br> 1) 01_habitat_length.csv -- details of road routes surveyed as line transects<br> 2) 02_sampling_events.csv -- details of individual line transect sample surveys along road routes<br> 3) 03_roadkill_data_final.csv -- roadkill occurrence data from sample surveys along road routes<br> 4) 04_canopy_and_habitat.csv -- canopy and habitat readings along road routes (transects) surveyed<br> 5) 05_roadkill_transects_all.kml -- KML file containing geographic tracks of 11 road routes surveyed as roadkill transects<br> 6) 06_road_transects_map.jpg -- Map of surveyed routes corresponding to Figure 1 in Jeganathan et al. (2018)</p> <p><strong>01_habitat_length.csv</strong><br> transect: name of road route surveyed as a line transect<br> route_description: description of road route<br> tlength_km: transect length along road in kilometres (km)<br> tlength_m: transect length along road in metres (m)<br> forest: extent of the road in metres (m) with forest on both sides<br> forest_tea: extent of the road in metres (m) with forest on one side, tea on the other<br> coffee_forest: extent of the road in metres (m) with forest on one side, coffee plantation on the other<br> tea: extent of the road in metres (m) with tea plantation on both sides<br> coffee: extent of the road in metres (m) with coffee plantation on both sides<br> eucalyptus: extent of the road in metres (m) with eucalyptus plantation on both sides<br> eucalyptus_tea: extent of the road in metres (m) with eucalyptus on one side, tea plantation on the other</p> <p><strong>02_sampling_events.csv</strong><br> season: monsoon (June to December 2011) or summer (March to June 2012 prior to the onset of 2012 monsoon)<br> transect: name of road route surveyed as a line transect<br> transect: name of road route surveyed as a line transect<br> tcode: unique code for each individual survey of a road route (transect) coevered on a specific date<br> eventDate: date of road survey<br> tlength: transect length along road in kilometres (km)</p> <p><strong>03_roadkilldata_final.csv</strong><br> sno: serial number of observation<br> season: monsoon (June to December 2011) or summer (March to June 2012 prior to the onset of 2012 monsoon)<br> transect: name of road route surveyed as a line transect<br> tcode: unique code for each individual survey of a road route (transect) coevered on a specific date<br> eventDate: date of road survey<br> fielddate: date of road survey as initially noted (for two surveys completed over two successive days, the initial date was recorded as eventDate for 2011-06-17 = 2011-06-16 and eventDate for 2011-07-06 = 2011-07-05<br> tlength: transect length along road in kilometres (km)<br> verbatimIdentification: original identification of roadkilled taxon<br> vernacularName: common name of taxon<br> scientificName: scientific name of taxon for corresponding taxonomic level of identification<br> taxonRank: rank of taxon indicating for corresponding taxonomic level of identification<br> taxonRemarks: category of taxon as noted for analysis<br> verbatimCoordinateSystem: coordinate system used for initial data collection<br> verbatimSRS: SRS of the location data collected (EPSG:32643/WGS84)<br> georeferenceRemarks: note indicating locations were converted from UTM (zone 43 N) to latitude longitude using QGIS software<br> verbatimLongitude: UTM longitude (Easting) as originally recorded<br> verbatimLatitude: UTM latitude (Northing) as originally recorded<br> decimalLongitude: longitude in decimal degree East<br> decimalLatitude: latitude in decimal degrees North<br> habitat: habitat on either side of the road (forest - forest on both sides; forest_tea - forest on one side, tea on the other; human - human settlements; coffee - coffee plantation on both sides; coffee_forest - coffee on one side, forest on the other; eucalyptus - eucalyptus plantation on both sides; eucalyptus_tea - eucalyptus on one side, tea on the other; tea - tea plantation)<br> individualCount: number of individuals recorded as roadkill (0 if no roadkills in that survey)<br> occurrenceStatus: indicated as 'present' for roadkills, or 'absent' if no roadkills recorded<br> occurrenceRemarks: notes and remarks if any</p> <p><strong>04_canopy_and_habitat.csv</strong><br> transect: name of road route surveyed as a line transect<br> verbatimroute: route name as originally noted<br> sno: serial number<br> canopycover: 0 if tree canopy absent, 1 if tree canopy present above point of observation<br> canopyoverlap: horizontal overlap of tree canopy above point of observation ranked as 0 - no canopy above; 1 canopy present but barely touching or overrlapping; 2 - canopy overlapping with sky still visible through leaves; 3 - canopy overlaps overhead densely with sky scarcely visible<br> verticaloverlap: vertical gap between canopy or branches of trees above point of observation ranked as 0 - very wide; 1 - barely touching, 2 - significant vertical overlap, 3 - substantial and dense vertical overlap<br> habcode: two letter alphabetical code with each letter indicating habitat on one side of the road at the point of observation with f - forest, t - tea, c - coffee, e - eucalyptus, v - village or human habitation, m - dam or reservoir<br> habno: numeric category for habitat on either side coded as 1 for monocultures (ee, tt); 2 for mixed forest and plantation (ef, ft, etc.); 3 for forest (ff), and 4 for coffee plantation (cc)<br> longitude: longitude in decimal degrees east<br> latitude: latitude in decimal degrees north</p> <p><strong>05_roadkill_transects_all.kml</strong><br> This KML file contains all 11 road routes surveyed as roadkill transects.</p> <p><strong>06_road_transects_map.jpg</strong><br> This map illustrating the surveyed road routes corresponds to Figure 1 in <a href="https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/619-626">Jeganathan et al. (2018), <em>Current Science</em> 114(3): 619-626</a>, DOI: 10.18520/cs/v114/i03/619-626</p>
Data from: Cross-scale regulation of seasonal microclimate by vegetation and snow in the Arctic tundra
<p>The zip file contains data and code from the analyses for von Oppen et al. (2022) <em>Global Change Biology</em> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16426">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16426</a>). Access through the provided R project file (e.g. with RStudio) is recommended for seamless running of the code. Please see the paper (link below) for methodological details, results and discussion, and the ReadMe included in the archive for further detail and usage policy.</p>
The Titan Seasonally Varying Radiative Species (SVRS) Dataset
<p><strong>Update 17 June 2023: The 'latitude' array is erroneously reversed relative to the 'abundance' array in svrs_molecule.nc. The user should reverse the order of 'latitude' upon reading it. Example: netCDF4.Dataset('svrs_molecule.nc)['latitude'][::-1]. This did not affect Lombardo & Lora (2023).</strong></p> <p>Here is archived the Titan <strong>S</strong>easonally <strong>V</strong>arying <strong>R</strong>adiative <strong>S</strong>pecies (SVRS) dataset, which consists of netCDF files containing trace gas abundances (svrs_molecule.nc) and the aerosol opacity (svrs_haze.nc). SVRS was developed with the intent of providing a single source of seasonal scale climatological information on Titan's radiatively active species from the troposphere through the stratopause. This was accomplished by interpolating between measurements from individual Cassini flybys of Titan where trace gas abundance and aerosol opacity were determined. The trace gases included are C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>, C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>, C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>, p-C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>4</sub>, C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>, HCN, and HC<sub>3</sub>N. The trace gas abundances are on 2° latitude, 5° <em>L<sub>s</sub></em> grid, with 99 levels extending from just above the surface to 0.001 Pa. Haze opacity is included for the infrared, visible, and ultraviolet spectral windows, spanning 1 cm<sup>-1</sup> -- 40000 cm<sup>-1</sup>. The haze opacity is on a 2° latitude, 5° <em>L<sub>s</sub></em> grid with 900 levels extending from 10<sup>6</sup> Pa (extrapolated to pressures greater than Titan's surface pressure) to 10<sup>-3</sup> Pa. The methods used to produce SVRS are detailed in Lombardo & Lora (2023), <em>Icarus</em>, doi: j.icarus.2022.115291. </p> <p>This archive also includes simulation data from the Titan Atmospheric Model (TAM), discussed in the above reference. This simulation utilized molecular abundance and aerosol opacity profiles from SVRS to calculate seasonally accurate radiative heating rates. This archive contains zonal means of the simulated zonal and meridional winds, temperature, and the calculated meridional mass stream function. The data are averaged over 10° <em>L<sub>s</sub></em> windows, and sampled every 10° <em>L<sub>s</sub></em> (with 1° <em>L<sub>s</sub></em> corresponding to approximately 1 Earth month), and extends from the surface (1.465×10<sup>5 </sup>Pa) through the lower mesosphere (about 0.01 Pa). An animation of the data included in this netCDF file is included as Lombardo_TAM_2023_data.mp4.</p> <p><strong>We ask that you cite us in your use of the data: Lombardo & Lora (2023), <em>Icarus</em>, doi: j.icarus.2022.115291</strong></p>
WACCM-X simulation output in support of publication "Impact of upward propagating migrating diurnal and semidiurnal tides on the ionosphere-thermosphere seasonal variation"
<p>This dataset contains simulation output from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with thermosphere-ionosphere eXtension (WACCM-X) in support of the publication "Impact of upward propagating migrating diurnal and semidiurnal tides on the ionosphere-thermosphere seasonal variation". Data files include the simulation results for a five-member ensemble of free-running simulations, simulations without the upward propagating diurnal migrating tide (DW1), and simulations without the upward propagating semidiurnal migrating tide (SW2). </p>
Supporting data for "Forest carbon uptake as influenced by snowpack and length of photosynthesis season in seasonally snow-covered forests of North America"
<p>This is a supporting dataset for the paper :</p> <div> <div>Yang, J. C., Bowling, D. R., Smith, K. R., Kunik, L., Raczka, B., Anderegg, W. R. L., Bahn, M., Blanken, P. D., Richardson, A. D., Burns, S. P., Bohrer, G., Desai, A. R., Arain, M. A., Staebler, R. M., Ouimette, A. P., Munger, J. W., and Litvak, M. E.: Forest carbon uptake as influenced by snowpack and length of photosynthesis season in seasonally snow-covered forests of North America, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 353, 110054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110054">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110054</a>, 2024.</div> </div> <p>Descriptions and units for each column can be found in a dedicated page within the data file. Methods are decribed in the paper.</p>
2021_2022_E4_EBIRD_30spp_SEASONAL_BirdDistribution_WMV_hosts
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>A series of weekly bird abundance distribution datasets is now available from EBIRD (<a href="https://science.ebird.org/en/status-and-trends" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://science.ebird.org/en/status-and-trends</a>). ERGO has processed these data in several tranches to provide weekly species richness and weekly aggregated abundance indices at 3km resolution. Data for thirty species have now been processed. These species have been selected as being West Nile Virus hosts, using literature search, inference from mosquito WNV vector blood meals and from bird serology reports. The two tranches are a) all 30 selected species and b) the top 15 E4Warning priority species . Details are provided in the accompanying Excel Spreadsheet (e4ebird readmeJune24.xls).</p> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> <p>This dataset has been requested for 'the Horizon e4Warning project on mapping and modelling West Nile Virus Disease and its Hosts' then been downloaded from ebird.org and it includes weekly abundance geospatial tifs for 30 species:</p> <ol> <li>weekly presence</li> <li>weekly species richness</li> <li>week abundance sum</li> </ol> <p>Data obtained from Ebird https://science.ebird.org/en/status-and-trends/species/</p> <p><strong>Species Names: </strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Species</strong></td> <td><strong>English Name</strong></td> <td><strong>filname code</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Alcedo atthis</td> <td>Common Kingfisher</td> <td>comkin1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Anas platyrhynchos</td> <td>Mallard</td> <td>mallar3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Anser anser</td> <td>Graylag Gose</td> <td>gragoo</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Athene noctua</td> <td>Little Owl</td> <td>litowl1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Bulbulcus ibis</td> <td>Cattle Egret</td> <td>categr</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Buteo buteo</td> <td>Common Buzzard</td> <td>combuz1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Columba palumbus</td> <td>Commin Wood Piegon</td> <td>cowpig</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Corvus cornix</td> <td>Hooded Crow</td> <td>hoocro1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Corvus corone cornix</td> <td>Carrion Crow</td> <td>carcro1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Corvus monedula</td> <td>Eurasian Jackdaw</td> <td>eurjac</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Cyanistes caeruleus</td> <td>Blue Tit</td> <td>blutit</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Egretta garzetta</td> <td>(Little Egret)</td> <td>litegr</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Eremophila alpestris</td> <td>Horned Lark</td> <td>horlar</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Falco tinnunculus</td> <td>Eurasian Kestrel</td> <td>eurkes</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Garrulus glandarius</td> <td>Eurasian Jay</td> <td>eurjay1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Hirundo rustica</td> <td>Barn Swallow</td> <td>barswa</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Larus argentatus</td> <td>Herring Gull</td> <td>hergul</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lulua arborea</td> <td>Woodlark</td> <td>woolar1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Luscinia Luscinia</td> <td>Thrush Nightinglae</td> <td>thrnig1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Luscinia megarhynchos</td> <td>Common nightingale</td> <td>comnig1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Passer domesticus (including Passer italiae and Passer hispaniolensis)</td> <td>House Sparrow</td> <td>houspa</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Pica pica</td> <td>Eurasian Magpie</td> <td>eurmag1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Streptopelia decaocto</td> <td>Eurasian Collared Dove</td> <td>eucdov</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Turdus merula</td> <td>Eurasian Blackbird</td> <td>eurbla</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Ciconia ciconia</td> <td>White Stork</td> <td>whisto1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Sturnus vulgaris</td> <td>European Starling</td> <td>eursta</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Sylvia atricapilla</td> <td>Eurasian Bl;ackcap</td> <td>blackc1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Acrocephalus scirpaceus</td> <td>Common Reed Warbler</td> <td>eurwar1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fulica atra</td> <td>Eurasian Coot</td> <td>eurcoo</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Columba livia</td> <td>Rock Pigeon</td> <td>rocpig</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Gallus gallus</td> <td>Domestic chicken</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>File Names:</strong></p> <div> <div><strong>a)</strong> e4ebirdabundanceall30weeklyJune24 All weekly abundance datasets for 30 availablke spp at 3km resolution, June 24</div> <div><strong>b) </strong>e4ebirdPAall30weeklyJune24 Presence absence with missing recoded to 0 for all 30 species available in June 24. This recoding is based of ad hoc checks of weekly datasets against the birdlife species ranges, which suggest that the maximum extents of combined weekly abundance distributions match the rage boundares fairly well </div> <div> </div> <div><strong>c)</strong> e4ebirdspprichnessall23SUMMEANweeklyFeb24 Summed and mean weekly presence absence for 23 available species calc Feb24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap</div> <div><strong>d)</strong> e4ebirdspprichnesse415SUMMEANweeklyJun24 Summed and mean weekly presence absence for e4 15 priority species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap</div> <div><strong>e)</strong> e4ebirdspprichnessall30SUMMEANweeklyJun24 Summed and mean weekly presence absence for 30 available species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap</div> <div> </div> <div><strong>f)</strong> e4ebirdabundanceall30summeanweekJun24 Summed and mean weekly median abundance for 30 available species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap</div> <div><strong>g)</strong> e4ebirdeabundance415summeanweekJun24 Summed and mean weekly median abundance for e4 15 priority species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap</div> <p> </p> </div> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Data used for doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018338 : Baars et al, 2012: Aerosol profiling with lidar in the Amazon Basin during the wet and dry season
<p><span>This is the data whoch ahs been used for the publication:</span></p> <p><span><span>Baars, H.</span></span><span>, <span>A. Ansmann</span>, <span>D. Althausen</span>, <span>R. Engelmann</span>, <span>B. Heese</span>, <span>D. Müller</span>, <span>P. Artaxo</span>, <span>M. Paixao</span>, <span>T. Pauliquevis</span>, and <span>R. Souza</span> (<span>2012</span>), <span>Aerosol profiling with lidar in the Amazon Basin during the wet and dry season</span>, <em>J. Geophys. Res.</em>, <span>117</span>, D21201, doi:<a title="Link to external resource: 10.1029/2012JD018338" href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018338" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.1029/2012JD018338</a>.</span></p> <p><span>For each of the Figures in the Publication the underlaying data is provided in a respective folder.</span></p> <p><span>The raw data (i.e,. the analyzed lidar data for several case during the one-year campaign in 2008) is provided separately.</span></p> <p><span>As the time of data creation is more than 10 years ago, the data description does not comply to current standards. Thus, in case of any questions, please contact the first author.</span></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Data archive and code for "Predicting September Arctic Sea Ice: A Multi-Model Seasonal Skill Comparison"
<p>This upload contains data and code related to the paper "Predicting September Arctic Sea Ice: A Multi-Model Seasonal Skill Comparison" by M. Bushuk, S. Ali, D. Bailey, Q. Bao, L. Batte, U. S. Bhatt, E. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E. Blockley, G. Cawley, J. Chi, F. Counillon, P. Goulet Coulombe, R. Cullather, F. X. Diebold, A. Dirkson, E. Exarchou, M. Gobel, W. Gregory, V. Guemas, L. Hamilton, B. He, S. Horvath, M. Ionita, J. E. Kay, E. Kim, N. Kimura, D. Kondrashov, Z. M. Labe, W. Lee, Y. J. Lee, C. Li, X. Li, Y. Lin, Y. Liu, W. Maslowski, F. Massonnet, W. N. Meier, W. J. Merryfield, H. Myint, J. C. Acosta Navarro, A. Petty, F. Qiao, D. Schroder, A. Schweiger, Q. Shu, M. Sigmond, M. Steele, J. Stroeve, N. Sun, S. Tietsche, M. Tsamados, K. Wang, J. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Williams, Q. Yang, X. Yuan, J. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0163.1.</p> <p>See README.txt for a description of the datasets and code.</p>
Data from: Multifaceted density dependence: Social structure and seasonality effects on Serengeti lion demography
<p>This dataset contains the data and R scripts to estimate the survival, transition, and detection probabilities (Lions_Survival_Transition_MultistateCMRModel.zip) as well as the probability of reproduction and recruitment to 1 year old (Lions_Reproduction_Recruitment_GLMM.zip) in a population of African lions (<em>Panthera leo</em>) monitored between 1984 and 2014 in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania.</p> <p>We assessed the season-specific effects of density measures at the intra- (number of females in a pride and male coalition size) and extra-group levels (number of nomadic coalitions in the home range of a group) using a Bayesian multistate capture-mark-recapture model for the survival and transition rates and Bayesian generalized linear mixed models for reproduction probability and recruitment. <br><br>The README file further describes each uploaded file.</p>
Seasonal Carbonate Chemistry Variability in Marine Surface Waters of the Pacific Northwest. Data Archive.
<p>This archive includes two .nc files (NetCDF format) containing observational data (discrete and mooring) from marine surface waters of the Pacific Northwest that have not yet been submitted to a long-term data repository. These data contributed to the development of seasonal cycle data products described in the manuscript by Fassbender et al. A metadata file is provided for the discrete data subset (upper 10 m of discrete observational data); however, the complete cruise datasets and metadata will be submitted for archival in the National Centers for Environmental Information’s (NCEI) Ocean Carbon and Acidification Data repository (<a href="https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/oceanacidification/">https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/oceanacidification/</a>). Data subsets are provided here for accelerated public access. Data users are encouraged to download the complete datasets from NCEI once they are available (<a href="https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/oceanacidification/stewardship/data_portal.html">https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/oceanacidification/stewardship/data_portal.html</a>). Metadata for the University of Washington Oceanic Remote Chemical/Optical Analyzer (ORCA) mooring observations used by Fassbender et al., including the temperature and salinity data from the Dabob Bay and Twanoh moorings, are not provided here. Quality control protocols applied to the ORCA mooring data are outlined in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (<a href="http://nwem.ocean.washington.edu/ORCA_QAPP.pdf">http://nwem.ocean.washington.edu/ORCA_QAPP.pdf</a>; Newton and Devol, 2012).</p>
Assessment of the condition of winter crops before winter dormancy on the basis of Planet data; season 2018
<p>NDVI determined on the basis of images of Planets from the dates 07.09.2018 and 14.10.2018, were used to study the assessment of the winter crop before winter dormancy. Available data from the September and October dates were used to assess the degree of development and density of plants.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.