Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 4. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962 in Ontogeny of morphological traits in Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, with remarks on juveniles of Oribatellidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURE 4. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, adult: (a) leg III, left, antiaxial view, (b) leg IV, left, antiaxial view.

FIGURE 5. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962 in Ontogeny of morphological traits in Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, with remarks on juveniles of Oribatellidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURE 5. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, adult, SEM photos: (a) dorsal view, (b) ventral view, (c) lateral view.

FIGURE 10. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962 in Ontogeny of morphological traits in Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, with remarks on juveniles of Oribatellidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURE 10. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, tritonymph, SEM photos: (a) dorsal view without exuvial scalp, (b) ventral view.

FIGURE 2. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962 in Ontogeny of morphological traits in Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, with remarks on juveniles of Oribatellidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURE 2. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, adult: (a) ventral view (gnathosoma and legs not illustrated), (b) posterior part of body, lateral view, (c) subcapitulum, ventral view, (d) palp, right, antiaxial view, (e) chelicera, left, paraxial view.

FIGURE 3. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962 in Ontogeny of morphological traits in Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, with remarks on juveniles of Oribatellidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURE 3. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, adult: (a) leg I, right, antiaxial view, (b) leg II, right, antiaxial view.

FIGURE 1. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962 in Ontogeny of morphological traits in Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, with remarks on juveniles of Oribatellidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURE 1. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, adult: (a) dorsal view (legs not illustrated), (b) anterior part of body, lateral view (legs not illustrated), (c) posterior view.

FIGURE 11. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962 in Ontogeny of morphological traits in Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, with remarks on juveniles of Oribatellidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURE 11. Oribatella palustris Hammer, 1962, tritonymph, SEM photos: (a) lateral view with exuvial scalps, (b) dorsal view with exuvial scalps.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Genotypes for GWAS study on feed efficiency traits in rabbits

<p>Dataset with genotypes on rabbits</p>

FIGURE 57 in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 57. Loadings plots of 12 acoustical variables for the first two components of a Principal Compoment Analysis (PCA) based on 45 species (= samples) of Physalaemus (A–C). Plots with the ordered variable loadings for first (A) and second (B) components. Distribution of the samples along the first and second components with the variable loadings depicted as vectors on the biplot (C). Colors indicate the species groups to which the species belong (see caption in the figure). "N_A" means "no species group assigned" (see Table 1). Note that the two groups are mainly separated by the frequency delta, fundamental frequency, bandwidth, and dominant frequencies at the beginning and end of the call along the second component (see text). The variable variances were scaled in order to equalize their influence in the PCA.

FIGURE 53. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 53. Call A of Physalaemus evangelistai. Oscillograms (A, C, and D) and audiospectrograms (B, E, and F). A typical call (A–B). Variant calls with different envelopes (C–F). Note the absence of PAM in the call (D–F). Horizontal scale bars have 0.2 s; vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 110 (B); 69 (E); 42.3 (F).

FIGURE 55. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 55. Call A of Physalaemus jordanensis. Oscillograms (A, C–H) and audiospectrograms (B, I–N). A typical call (A–B). Variant calls with different envelopes (C and I; E–H, K–N). Final pulses of a call (D and J). Note the longer duration of the final pulse (D and J). Horizontal scale bars have 0.3 s (C and I; E–H, K–N) and 0.1 s (D and J); vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 135 (L); 78.9 (M); 110 (J); 61.4 (N); 69 (I and K); 61.9 (B).

FIGURE 51. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 51. Call A of Physalaemus lisei. Oscillograms (A, C, E–I) and audiospectrograms (B, D, J–N). Ten calls gathered in groups (A–B). A typical call (C–D). Variant calls with different envelopes and spectral features (E–N). Note PFM and the subharmonics in the calls (J, K, L, M, and N). Horizontal scale bars have 0.5 s; vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 61.9 (D and P); 46 (K, L, N, and O); 69 (B); 55.2 (M).

FIGURE 52 in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 52. Multiplicity relationship between "instantaneous" dominant frequency and w of calls A of four Physalaemus species. Each graph shows a single call A of P. gracilis (A), P. lisei (B), P. evangelistai (C), P. barrioi (D), P. jordanensis (E). Grid corresponds to the harmonic values (right y-axis). Red squares are the values of "instantaneous" dominant frequency; blue circles are the values of the reciprocal of w; green triangles are the factor values of the ratio "instantaneous" dominant frequency / w reciprocal per delta time. Delta time corresponds to the duration of one period of the measured acoustic oscillation. Note that factors around integer values suggest harmonic relationship between the frequency calculated (w reciprocal) and the dominant frequency.

FIGURE 50. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 50. Call A of Physalaemus gracilis. Oscillograms (A, C–G, and M–P) and audiospectrograms (B, H–L, and Q–T). A typical call A (A–B). Variant calls A with different envelopes and spectral features (C–T). Note the presence of subharmonics at the beginning or middle of the call (I, L, Q, and R). Horizontal scale bars have 0.5 s (C–L) and 0.2 s (M–T); vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 42.3 (B); 84.6 (K, L, and T); 74.6 (J); 55.2 (I and R); 69.0 (H and S); 61.4 (Q).

FIGURE 48. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 48. Call A of Physalaemus santafecinus. Oscillograms (A and C) and audiospectrograms (B and D). A typical call (A–B). A variant call with a different envelope and spectral features (C–D). Note the different slopes in the FM segments (D). Horizontal scale bars have 0.1 s; vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 84.6 (B and D).

FIGURE 46. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 46. Call A of Physalaemus biligonigerus. Oscillograms (A, C, and D) and audiospectrograms (B, E, and F). A typical call (A–B). Variant calls with different envelopes and spectral features (C–F). Note the shorter duration of the initial FM segment (F). Horizontal scale bars have 0.1 s; vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 61.9 (B); 62.8 (E); 69.0 (F). Pulses of high frequency in the background in (F) correspond to calls of Pseudopaludicola sp.

FIGURE 45. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 45. Call A of Physalaemus riograndensis. Oscillograms (A, C, and D) and audiospectrograms (B, E, and F). A typical call (A–B). Variant calls with different envelopes (C–F). Horizontal scale bars have 0.2 s; vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 92.1 (E and F); 42.3 (B).

FIGURE 54. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 54. Call A of Physalaemus barrioi. Oscillograms (A, C–G) and audiospectrograms (B, H–L). A typical call (A–B). Variant calls with different envelopes (C–L). Note the subharmonics at the middle of the call (B). Horizontal scale bars have 0.5 s; vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. FFT (points): 2000 (H, J, and I); 2500 (B); 1024 (K); 1500 (L).

FIGURE 44. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 44. Call A of Physalaemus olfersii. Oscillograms (A and C) and audiospectrograms (B and D). A typical call (A–B). A variant call with a different envelope and spectral features (C–D). Note the deterministic chaos at the beginning of the call (B). Note the higher noise level in the call and the irregular PFM (D). Horizontal scale bars have 0.5 s; vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 25.4 (B and D).

FIGURE 43. Call A in Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae)

FIGURE 43. Call A of Physalaemus lateristriga. Oscillograms (A, C, and D) and audiospectrograms (B, E, and F). A typical call (A–B). Variant calls with different envelopes and different spectral features (C–F). Horizontal scale bars have 0.5 s (C and E) and 0.1 s (D and F); vertical scale bars have 1 kHz. Filter bandwidth (Hz): 18.4 (E); 42.3 (B); 31.7 (F).