Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in Two new species of the genus Terrobittacus Tan & Hua, 2009 (Mecoptera: Bittacidae) from southwestern China with a key to species

Fig. 1. Terrobittacus rostratus sp. nov. A. ♀, habitus in lateral view. B. Head in frontal view. C. Thorax in dorsal view. Abbreviations: Ant = antenna; Cly = clypeus; Fr = frons; Lr = labrum; MP = maxillary palp. Scale bars: A = 5.0 mm; B–C = 0.5 mm.

Figs 41–48 in Redescription of the types of species of Anastatus Motschulsky, 1859 (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) described by J.K. Sheng and coauthors

Figs 41–48. Anastatus shichengensis, ♀. 41–46. Holotype. 41. Body, lateral view. 42. Head, frontal view. 43. Body, dorsal view. 44. Head, lateral view. 45. Mesosoma, dorsal view. 46. Head, frontolateral view. – 47–48. Paratype. 47. Front leg (the tooth is arrowed). 48. Apex of mesotibia and mesotarsus.

Figs 34–40 in Redescription of the types of species of Anastatus Motschulsky, 1859 (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) described by J.K. Sheng and coauthors

Figs 34–40. Anastatus meilingensis Sheng & Yu, 1998. 34–36, 39. Holotype, ♀. 37, 38, 40. Paratype, ♀. – 34. Body, dorsal view. 35. Head, frontodorsal view. 36. Body, lateral view. 37. Head, frontal view. 38. Mesonotum, dorsal view. 39. Antenna. 40. Head, dorsal view.

Fig. 2 in Two new species of Yaginumaella (Araneae, Salticidae) from Wuling Mountain, China

Fig. 2. Yaginumaella pulchella sp. nov. A–B. ♂, HNU-HN-IV-1417-02. C–D. ♀, HNU-HN-IV-1417-02. A. Male palp, ventral view. B. Male palp, retrolateral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogeny of Blaberidae (Dictyoptera, Blattodea), with implications for taxonomy and evolutionary scenarios

Fig. 2. Conflicting results among different molecular markers. The phylogenetic relationships of four species are detailed for separate and combined analyses performed in Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI). Boxes colored as 'Untested or unresolved' refer to missing data and multifurcation, respectively.

Figs 28–33 in Redescription of the types of species of Anastatus Motschulsky, 1859 (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) described by J.K. Sheng and coauthors

Figs 28–33. Anastatus huangi Sheng & Yu, 1998, holotype, ♀. 28. Body, lateral view. 29. Head, frontodorsal view. 30. Head, frontal view. 31. Mesosoma, dorsal view. 32. Scutellar-axillar complex and fore wing, dorsal view. 33. Middle and hind legs.

Fig. 4 in Two new species of Yaginumaella (Araneae, Salticidae) from Wuling Mountain, China

Fig. 4. Yaginumaella hubeiensis sp. nov. A–C. Holotype, ♂ (HNU-HB-IV-1626). D–F. Paratype, ♀ (HNU-HB-IV-1624). A. Male body, dorsal view. B. Male palp, ventral view. C. Male palp, retrolateral view. D. Female body, dorsal view. E. Epigyne, ventral view. F. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, D = 1 mm; B–C, E–F = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 2 in The identification of the species of the 'Spilogona contractifrons species-group' and the 'Spilogona nitidicauda species-group' (Diptera, Muscidae) based on morphological and molecular analysis

Fig. 2. Spilogona orthosurstyla Xue & Tian, 1988. A. Terminalia, lateral view. B. Terminalia, dorsal view. C. Sternite 5. Scare bars: 0.25 mm.

Fig. 1 in The identification of the species of the 'Spilogona contractifrons species-group' and the 'Spilogona nitidicauda species-group' (Diptera, Muscidae) based on morphological and molecular analysis

Fig. 1. Males of Spilogona Schnabl, 1911. A–C. Male head and scutum, anterior view. A. S. contractifrons (Zetterstedt, 1838). B. S. arctica (Zetterstedt, 1838). C. S. alticola (Malloch, 1920). D–F. Sternite 5. D. S. contractifrons. E. S. arctica. F. S. alticola. G–I. Abdomen, dorsal view. G. S. contractifrons. H. S. arctica. I. S. alticola. J–L. Terminalia, lateral view. J. S. contractifrons. K. S. arctica. L. S. alticola. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 12. Epicnemial carina, anterior view. A in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 12. Epicnemial carina, anterior view. A. Enicospilus ryrholmi sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (NHRS- HEVA000008173). B. E. adustus (Haller, 1885), ♀.

Fig. 13 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 13. Central part of fore wing. A. Enicospilus repentinus (Holmgren, 1860), ♀. B. Enicospilus merdarius (Gravenhorst, 1829), ♀. C. Enicospilus inflexus (Ratzeburg, 1844), ♀.

Fig. 6 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 6. Occipital carina, postero-ventral view. A. Enicospilus adustus (Haller, 1885), ♀. B. E. ryrholmi sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (NHRS-HEVA000008149).

Fig. 4 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 4. Central part of fore wing. A. Enicospilus combustus (Gravenhorst, 1829), ♀. B. E. cederbergi sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (NHRS-HEVA000008146). C. E. ryrholmi sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (NHRS- HEVA000008173). D. E. adustus (Haller, 1885), ♀.

Fig. 3. Central and apical flagellomeres. A–B. Enicospilus cerebrator Aubert, 1966. C–D. E in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 3. Central and apical flagellomeres. A–B. Enicospilus cerebrator Aubert, 1966. C–D. E. cederbergi sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (NHRS-HEVA000008148). E–F. E. adustus (Haller, 1885). G–H. E. ryrholmi sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (NHRS-HEVA000008173).

Fig. 2 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 2. Enicospilus cederbergi sp. nov., holotype, ♀ (NHRS-HEVA00008145). A. Habitus, dorsolateral view. B. Habitus, lateral view. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 16 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 16. Distribution of South American Cimbicidae. Records marked with an asterisk are for states within the relevant countries for which no more precise records were available; the markers have been placed approx. in the middle of the state in question. Some records have not been plotted to avoid cluttering the map.

Fig. 15 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 15. Pseudopachylosticta subflavata (Kirby, 1882), Ƌ, habitus, dorsal view (MHNH). Abbreviations: M, Rs = wing veins; M*, Rs* = wing cells; n2 = mesoscutum; T1 = 1st abdominal tergum; yellow arrow = median mesoscutal sulcus; green arrow = notaulus.

Fig. 15. Hind tarsal claws. A in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 15. Hind tarsal claws. A. Enicospilus ramidulus (Linnaeus, 1758), ♀. B. E. adustus (Haller, 1885), ♀.

Fig. 9 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 9. Head, anterior and lateral view. A–C. Enicospilus intermedius sp. nov., paratypes, ♀♀ (NHRS-HEVA000008171, NHRS-HEVA000008166). D–F. E. myricae Broad & Shaw, 2016, ♀♀. G–I. E. adustus (Haller, 1885), ♀♀.

Fig. 1 in Two new species of Yaginumaella (Araneae, Salticidae) from Wuling Mountain, China

Fig. 1. Yaginumaella pulchella sp. nov. A–C. Holotype, ♂ (HNU-HN-IV-1417-02). D–F. Paratype, ♀ (HNU-HN-IV-1417-02). A. Male body, dorsal view. B. Male palp, ventral view. C. Male palp, retrolateral view. D. Female body, dorsal view. E. Epigyne, ventral view. F. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: A, D = 1 mm; B–C, E–F = 0.2 mm.