Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 14 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 14. Head in lateral view. A. Enicospilus merdarius (Gravenhorst, 1829), ♀. B. Enicospilus repentinus (Holmgren, 1860), ♀.

Fig. 3 in Two new species of Yaginumaella (Araneae, Salticidae) from Wuling Mountain, China

Fig. 3. Distribution records of Yaginumaella hubeiensis sp. nov. (red triangles) and Y. pulchella sp. nov. (green dot).

Fig. 4 in The identification of the species of the 'Spilogona contractifrons species-group' and the 'Spilogona nitidicauda species-group' (Diptera, Muscidae) based on morphological and molecular analysis

Fig. 4. Males of Spilogona Schnabl, 1911. A–C. Head, lateral view. A. S. imitatrix (Malloch, 1921). B. S. nitidicauda (Schnabl, 1911). C. S. platyfrons Sorokina, 2018. D–F. Frons, anterior view. D. S. imitatrix. E. S. nitidicauda. F. S. platyfrons. G–I. Abdomen, dorsal view. G. S. imitatrix. H. S. nitidicauda. I. S. platyfrons. Scale bars: 1 mm.

opencc-by-3.0Mar 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogeny of Blaberidae (Dictyoptera, Blattodea), with implications for taxonomy and evolutionary scenarios

Fig. 1. [part 2 on next page] Optimal phylogenetic tree reconstructed in Maximum Likelihood with the combined dataset. Bootstrap values and posterior probabilities are reported for each node (bootstrap values below 25% are not displayed). The color of internal branches is proportional to bootstrap values. Geographic origin of the specimens sequenced is provided in brackets after the species names. In purple, monophyletic group congruent with morphological hypotheses; in blue, monophyletic group with geographic consistency at the continental level; in brown, incertae sedis species; in green, four species with conflicting and supported positions (Thanatophyllum akinetum Grandcolas, 1991 and Phoetalia pallida (Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1865) or congruent, but weakly supported positions (Laxta sp. and Pronauphoeta cf. viridula (Palisot de Beauvois, 1805)). The four latter species are discussed in the text (see also Fig. 2). The subfamilies indicated on the right of the tree are derived from traditional morphology-based classifications. Units for the branch length scale at the bottom right: number of expected substitutions per site.

Fig. 5 in Two new species of Yaginumaella (Araneae, Salticidae) from Wuling Mountain, China

Fig. 5. Yaginumaella hubeiensis sp. nov. A–B. ♂, HNU-HB-IV-1626. C–D. ♀, HNU-HB-IV-1624. A. Male palp, ventral view. B. Male palp, retrolateral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Fig. 7 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 7. Posterior metasomal segments and male parameres in lateral view. A. Enicospilus ryrholmi sp. nov., paratype, Ƌ (MZLU Type no. 06123:10). B. E. cederbergi sp. nov., paratype, Ƌ (NHRS- HEVA000008154).

opencc-by-3.0Mar 2017View details →

Figs 19–27 in Redescription of the types of species of Anastatus Motschulsky, 1859 (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) described by J.K. Sheng and coauthors

Figs 19–27. Anastatus fulloi Sheng & Wang, 1997. 19–24. Holotype, ♀. 25–27. Allotype, ♂. – 19. Head, frontal view. 20. Head, frontolateral view. 21. Head, dorsal view. 22. Antennae. 23. Fore wing. 24. Mesonotum. 25. Antennae. 26. Body, lateral view. 27. Head, dorsal view.

Fig. 2 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 2. Fore wing, ♀♀. A. Pachylosticta apicalis (Westwood, 1835) (NHRS). B. Agenocimbex maculata (Marlatt, 1898) (NSMT). C. Pergidae, Parasyzygoniinae: Parasyzygonia cyanoptera (Klug, 1824) (NHMD). Abbreviations: Rs, Rs+M, M, 2r, 2r-m, 2m-cu, 1a, 2a = wing veins; 1R*, Rs* = wing cells; violet arrow = junction between veins Sc+R and M; red arrow = junction between veins Sc+R and Rs+M.

Fig. 1. Antenna. A. Pseudabia fusca Schrottky, 1910 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 1. Antenna. A. Pseudabia fusca Schrottky, 1910, ♀ (NMNH). B. Trichiosoma latreillei (Leach, 1817), ♀ (NHML).

FIG. 6 in A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain

FIG. 6. — Stereo view of the right m1 BAT-5'10.G14.129 of Circamustela peignei n. sp. from Batallones-5: A, buccal view; B, lingual view; C, occlusal view; D, mesial view; E, distal view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

FIG. 8 in A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain

FIG. 8. — Bivariate plot of the length (L) and with (W) of the M1 of Neogene martens. The linear regression a' (r2 = 0.73) is defined by relatively hypercarnivorous martens, characterized by short M1 talon and comprise Circamustela spp., and Sinictis. The linear regression b' (r2 = 0.75) is defined by more generalist taxa, characterized by longer M1 talon, comprising Pekania Gray, 1865, Paramartes Kretzoi, 1952 and Martes Pinel, 1792. The values are given in mm. Abbreviations: r2, coefficient of determination. M1s pictures are showed scaled between them. Sources: Zdansky (1924); Viret (1951); Mein (1958); Petter (1976); Schmidt-Kittler (1995); Morlo (1997); Montoya et al. (2011); Wang et al. 2012; Peigné (2012); Samuels & Cavin (2013).

FIG. 3 in A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain

FIG. 3. — Micro CT-scan reconstruction of the fragmentary cranium BAT-3'10.1246 of Circamustela peignei n. sp. from Batallones-3: A, Ventral view; B, sagittal slice; C, horizontal slice; D, transversal slice. Abbreviations: ac, accessory crest; as, accessory septum; co, cochleae; eam, external auditory meatus; fm, foramen magnum; oc, occipital condyle. Scale bar: 20 mm.

Fig. 5 in Second contribution to the knowledge of the Lithosiini of Gabon: the genus Nanna Birket-Smith (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae)

Fig. 5. Female genitalia. Figures are not in equal proportion. A. Nanna ceratopygia Birket-Smith, 1965, ♀ allotype. B. Nanna eningae (Plötz, 1880), ♀, Gabon, Makokou-Ipassa, 500 m, 0°30'43''N 12°48'13''E, 5-10 Apr. 2010, gen. prep. n. 558/10 MAD. C. Nanna semigrisea sp. nov., ♀ paratype

FIG. 2 in A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain

FIG. 2. — Cranium and upper dentition of Circamustela peignei n. sp. from Batallones-3: A-E, cranium BAT-3'10.1570 (Holotype); A, lateral view; B, dorsal view; C, occlusal view of the Micro CT-scan reconstruction; D, rostral view; E, caudal view; F-L, fragmentary cranium BAT-3'11.1041, comprising the muzzle (F-G), a left fragment of the maxillary with a fragmented P3 and a complete P4 (H-I) and an isolated right P4 (J-L); F, dorsal view; G, rostral view; H, buccal view; I, occlusal view; J, buccal view; K, lingual view; L, occlusal view. Scale bar: 20 mm.

FIG. 9 in A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain

FIG. 9. — Bivariate plot of the length (L) and with (W) of the m1 of Neogene martens. The linear regression a' (r2 = 0.37) is defined by relatively hypercarnivorous mustelids, characterized by slender m1 and comprise Circamustela spp., and Sinictis. The linear regression b' (r2 = 0.73) is defined by more generalist taxa, characterized by robust m1 talonid, comprising Pekania Gray, 1865, Paramartes Kretzoi, 1952 and Martes Pinel, 1792. The values are given in mm. Abbreviations: r2, coefficient of determination. Same legend than Figure 6 and m1s pictures are showed scaled between them. Source: Zdansky (1924); Pilgrim (1931); Colbert (1933, 1935); Viret (1951); Kretzoi (1952); Mein (1958); Petter (1963; 1964, 1967); Pons-Moyà (1990); Schmidt-Kittler (1995); Roussiakis (2002); Ghaafar et al. (2004); Montoya et al. (2011); Wang et al. (2012); Peigné (2012); Samuels & Cavin (2013).

FIG. 4 in A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain

FIG. 4. — Micro CT-scan reconstruction of the fragmentary cranium BAT-3'10.1246 of Circamustela peignei n. sp. from Batallones-3: A-D, the skull and jaw are shown in semitransparent turquoise and the dentition in grayscale; A, rostral view; B, dorsal view; C, ventral view; D, lateral view; E, upper dentition, occlusal view; F, lower dentition, occlusal view; G-I, left hemimandible; G, buccal view; H, lingual view; I, occlusal view. Scale bars: A-D, 10 mm; E-I, 5 mm.

FIG. 7 in A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain

FIG. 7. — Main comparative material of species of late Miocene martens and marten-like mustelids from Eurasia analysed herein: A, BAT-3'10.1570, micro CTscan reconstruction of the left upper dentition of Circamustela peignei n. sp. (holotype) from Batallones-3, occlusal view; B-D, left hemimandible BAT-3'13.1048 of Circamustela peignei n. sp. (paratype) from Batallones-3; B, buccal view; C, lingual view; D, occlusal view; E, IPS-28086, left M1 of Circamustela dechaseauxi

Fig. 11 in Iphimediidae of New Zealand (Crustacea, Amphipoda)

Fig. 11. Labriphimedia martinae nov. sp., holotype ♂, 6.5 mm, NIWA 84743. A. Pereopod 5. B. Pleopod 1. C. Right uropod 2. D. Uropod 1. E. Uropod 3. F. Telson. Scale bars: A-F = 100 µm.

Fig. 10 in Iphimediidae of New Zealand (Crustacea, Amphipoda)

Fig. 10. Labriphimedia martinae nov. sp., holotype ♂, 6.5 mm, NIWA 84743. A. Pereopod 4. B. Presumed carpus to dactylus of pereopod 4. C. Pereopod 7. D. Pereopod 6. Scale bars: A-D = 100 µm.

Fig. 6 in Iphimediidae of New Zealand (Crustacea, Amphipoda)

Fig. 6. Labriphimedia meikae nov. sp., holotype ♂, 6 mm, NIWA 84598. A. Pereopod 6. B. Coxa of pereopod 7. C. Basis to merus of pereopod 7. D. Uropod 3. E. Uropod 2. F. Uropod 1. G. Telson. Scale bars: A-C = 200 µm, D-G = 100 µm.