Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2015View details →

Fig. 2b. Phylogenetic tree indicating the Asia-I in Prevalence of a new genetic group, MEAM-K, of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Karnataka, India, as evident from mtCOI sequences

Fig. 2b. Phylogenetic tree indicating the Asia-I group, which was the most abundant genetic group in this study.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Database of Benchmark Molecules with Functional Groups

<p>A dataset was created by calculating 156 molecules, each with around 800 conformers. To store the dataset, a database was designed that supports CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations, allowing efficient management and retrieval of the data. Each molecule is associated with a unique identifier (SMILES), and each conformer has an ID as well. The molecules also have their corresponding functional groups, which they can be identified by, as well. A PDF file representing the functional groups is included, ensuring comprehensive documentation and easy access to the molecular data.<br>The python script, can be accessed via the repository link.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Fig 4 in Diversity and distribution of scleractinian corals from Mandapam group of Islands in Gulf of Mannar marine national park, South East coast of India

Fig 4: Correspondence Analyses of life form categories recorded from the reef islands in Mandapam group, Gulf of Mannar Marina National Park. HC – Hard corals, SC- Soft coral, CB- Coral bleaching, AA-Algae, SP – Sponges, DC-Dead corals, RB-Rubbles, SD- Sand, SI – Silt, OT-Others, SI –Shingle Island, KI – Kurusadai Island, PI – Pullivasal Island, POI – Poomarichan Island, MPI – Manoliputti Island, MI – Manoli Island, HI - Hare Island.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Figure 3 in Description of Upeneus madras (Mullidae), a new goatfish species from SE India (NE Indian Ocean), with establishment of the pori-species group and a review of barbel colour in Upeneus species

Figure 3. – Relationship among five morphometric characters in Upeneus madras n. sp. and four other species of the pori group.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Figure 4 in Description of Upeneus madras (Mullidae), a new goatfish species from SE India (NE Indian Ocean), with establishment of the pori-species group and a review of barbel colour in Upeneus species

Figure 4. – Relationship among four morphometric characters in Upeneus madras n. sp. and U. guttatus from the NE Indian Ocean (NEIO) and all other areas of the Indo-Pacific, showing data for the newly designated lectotype (LT) and paralectotype (PLT).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Figure 1. – A-I in Description of Upeneus madras (Mullidae), a new goatfish species from SE India (NE Indian Ocean), with establishment of the pori-species group and a review of barbel colour in Upeneus species

Figure 1. – A-I: The nine species of the pori group: A: Upeneus madras n. sp., BPBM 20658, PT, 110 mm SL, Chennai, SE India (J.E. Randall); B: U. asymmetricus, CSIRO H 7517-02, 93 mm SL, Lombok, S Indonesia (W.T. White); C: U. australiae, CSIRO H 4056-01, 105 mm SL (A. Graham); D: U. dimipavlov, VNMN-I 2056, HT, 120 mm SL, N of Hon Tre Island, Nha Trang, S-central Vietnam (D.A. Pavlov); E: Upeneus elongatus, KAUM-I. 58746, HT, 89 mm SL, Tanega-shima Island, S Japan (H. Motomura); F: U. floros, SAIAB 204583, HT, 107 mm SL, Two Miles Reef, Sodwana Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (C. Floros); G: U. itoui KAUM-I. 13595, PT, 118 mm SL, Kagoshima Prefecture, S Japan (H. Motomura); H: U. pori, SAIAB 209540 (wrongly referred to as SAIAB 192775 by Uiblein et al., 2020: fig. 6F, and Uiblein and Motomura, 2021: fig. 7E), 94 mm SL, off NE Madagascar (J. Escobar-Porras); I: U. willwhite, CSIRO H 7217-07, HT, 90 mm SL, Lombok, S Indonesia (W.T. White); J: the japonicus-group species U. guttatus, SAIAB 13947, 100 mm SL, off Kenya (P.C. Heemstra). Scale bars = 20 mm.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Grouping and genetic diversity of different watermelon ecotypes based on agro-morphological traits and ISSR marker

Fig. 1. Grouping the watermelon ecotypes based on agro-morphological traits using UPGMA method. The symbols for the ecotypes are presented in Table 1.

Fig. 7 in Two new species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the rio Paraguay basin, with a redescription of Hypostomus cochliodon Kner, 1854

Fig. 7. Spots and color pattern of fins in Hypostomus cochliodon; (a) NUP 12071, 151.1 mm SL, showing spots smaller and closely spaced on head and larger and widely spaced on the body; (b) NUP 12768, 241.1 mm SL, the base of fin with same color of body, becoming dark brown in tip; and uniform spot pattern in ventral portion of body.

Fig. 5 in Two new species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the rio Paraguay basin, with a redescription of Hypostomus cochliodon Kner, 1854

Fig. 5. Mouth and teeth of (a) Hypostomus cochliodon, NUP 10807, 208.0 mm SL, showing one series of papillae in inner face of upper and lower jaws; (b) Hypostomus basilisko, holotype, MZUSP 111110, 182.5 mm SL, showing the agglomerated papillae on inner face of upper and lower jaws; and (c) Hypostomus khimaera, MZUSP 111129, holotype, 139.1 mm SL, showing weakly developed papillae not forming series.

Fig. 6 in Two new species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the rio Paraguay basin, with a redescription of Hypostomus cochliodon Kner, 1854

Fig. 6. Keels, ridges and odontodes of (a) Hypostomus cochliodon, NUP 10807, 208.0 mm SL, showing two weakly developed ridges in compound pterotic, weakly developed keels, few and weakly developed odontodes and predorsal keels weakly developed; (b) Hypostomus basilisko, holotype, MZUSP 111110, 182.5 mm SL, showing the three ridges on top of head, strongly developed keels, numerous welldeveloped odontodes on plates covering body and head and strong V-shaped predorsal keels; (c) Hypostomus khimaera, holotype, MZUSP 111129, 139.1 mm SL, showing moderately developed keels and dermal plates supporting moderately developed odontodes.

Fig. 12 in Two new species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the rio Paraguay basin, with a redescription of Hypostomus cochliodon Kner, 1854

Fig. 12. Sexual dimorphism of Hypostomus basilisko; (a) MNRJ 40184, paratype, 162.3 mm SL, showing pelvic-fin spine with no tumescence in adult female; (b) MNRJ 40184, paratype, 149.1 mm SL, showing a weakly developed tumescence (indicated by arrow) in juvenile male; (c) MZUSP 111110, holotype, 182.5 mm SL, showing well-developed tumescence (indicated by arrow) in adult male.

Fig. 8 in Two new species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the rio Paraguay basin, with a redescription of Hypostomus cochliodon Kner, 1854

Fig. 8. Color pattern of live specimen of Hypostomus cochliodon (uncatalogued specimen) from córrego da Onça, Mato Grosso, rio Paraguay basin.

Fig. 4 in Two new species of the Hypostomus cochliodon group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from the rio Paraguay basin, with a redescription of Hypostomus cochliodon Kner, 1854

Fig. 4. Lateral view of juvenile in (a) Hypostomus cochliodon, NUP 11956, 92.8 mm SL, (b) Hypostomus basilisko, paratype, ZUFMS-PIS 3083, 64.2 mm SL and (c) Hypostomus khimaera, NUP 13494, 68.8 mm SL.

Fig. 3 in Morphometric variation of the Herichthys bartoni (Bean, 1892) species group (Teleostei: Cichlidae): How many species comprise H. labridens (Pellegrin, 1903)?

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic analysis of the Herichthys bartoni species group obtained from the Bayesian analysis of an approximately 652 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (DNA Barcode). Numbers above nodes are the Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) for the principal clades recovered in the analysis. The haplotypes of the species included in the H. cyanoguttatus species group were collapsed to facilitate representation.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2015View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular and cytogenetic analyses of cryptic species within the Synbranchus marmoratus Bloch, 1795 (Synbranchiformes: Synbranchidae) grouping: species delimitations, karyotypic evolution and intraspecific diversification

Fig. 3. Representative ideograms of the analyzed karyomorphs of Synbranchus marmoratus showing the heterochromatic blocks, as determined by C-banding, and hybridization patterns of ribosomal sites.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2015View details →

Fig. 1. A in Molecular and cytogenetic analyses of cryptic species within the Synbranchus marmoratus Bloch, 1795 (Synbranchiformes: Synbranchidae) grouping: species delimitations, karyotypic evolution and intraspecific diversification

Fig. 1. A map showing the Synbranchus marmoratus specimen collection sites. Numbers indicate the sample locality, whereas symbols represent the karyomorphs found at each locality.

Fig. 2 in Morphometric variation of the Herichthys bartoni (Bean, 1892) species group (Teleostei: Cichlidae): How many species comprise H. labridens (Pellegrin, 1903)?

Fig. 2. Landmarks recorded in this study. 1. Anterior end of the lower maxilla 2. Anterior end of the upper maxilla 3. Length of the ascending premaxillary process 4. End of the supraoccipital bone 5. Start of the dorsal fin 6. Last spine of the dorsal fin 7. End of the dorsal fin 8. Upper boundary of the caudal fin 9. Center of the caudal fin 10. Base of the caudal fin 11. End of the anal fin 12. Last spine of the anal fin 13. Origin of the anal fin 14. Origin of the pelvic fin 15. Posterior end of the lower maxilla 16. Posterior end of the upper lip 17. Maximum point of curvature at the preoperculum 18. Upper end of the preoperculum 19. Upper end of the operculum 20. Most posterior end at the operculum 21. Origin of the pectoral fin 22. Upper extreme of the sphenotic orbit 23. Base of the sphenotic orbit 24. Left extreme of the sphenotic orbit 25. Right extreme of the sphenotic orbit.

Fig. 5 in Morphometric variation of the Herichthys bartoni (Bean, 1892) species group (Teleostei: Cichlidae): How many species comprise H. labridens (Pellegrin, 1903)?

Fig. 5. Canonical variance analysis derived from the geometric morphometric analysis of the species included in the Herichthys bartoni species group. A) canonical variate 1 and 2 for the head, B) canonical variate 2 and 3 for the head, C) canonical variate 1 and 2 for the body, D) canonical variate 2 and 3 for the body. Symbology: Blue: H. bartoni, Red: H. cf. labridens, Green: H. labridens, Violet: H. molango, Black: H. pame, Gray: H. pantostictus, Brown: H. steindachneri.

Fig. 1 in Morphometric variation of the Herichthys bartoni (Bean, 1892) species group (Teleostei: Cichlidae): How many species comprise H. labridens (Pellegrin, 1903)?

Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of the species included in the Herichthys bartoni group. Note: The species H. pratinus was not included in this work.

Fig. 4 in Morphometric variation of the Herichthys bartoni (Bean, 1892) species group (Teleostei: Cichlidae): How many species comprise H. labridens (Pellegrin, 1903)?

Fig. 4. Canonical variance analysis derived from the discriminant function analysis of the species included in the Herichthys bartoni species group. A) Meristic data B) Morphometric data adjusted by the method of Mossimann C) Morphometric data adjusted as proportions. Symbology: Blue: H. bartoni, Red: H. cf. labridens, Green: H. labridens, Violet: H. molango, Black: H. pame, Gray: H. pantostictus, Brown: H. steindachneri.