Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 2. Photograph of Llankibatrachus truebae (Holotype, BAR 2469–10) representing a nearly complete, articulated cranial and postcranial skeleton. The specimen is mostly preserved as a dorsal impression, although the ventral surface of several sectioned bones still in situ is also evident. Note the body outline preserved in this specimen. Scale bar = 3 mm.

Figure 14 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 14. Nasals and sphenethmoid of two anuran taxa in dorsal view. A, Shelania pascuali (CBPA 12213). B, Xenopus laevis (KU 69842). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Not to scale.

Figure 11. Nieuwkoop & Faber Stage 57 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 11. Nieuwkoop & Faber Stage 57/58 tadpole of Llankibatrachus truebae in ventral view. The irregular, stippled area in the posterior half of the head denotes calcium deposits. Stippling in the left leg (right side of the figure) shows ossification of the femur, tibia, and fibula. Scale bar = 3 mm.

Figure 1 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 1. Map of north-western Patagonia showing location of the two fossiliferous sites near the northern margin of the Nahuel Huapi Lake, from which Llankibatrachus truebae was recovered.

Figure 5 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 5. Skull and pectoral girdle of Llankibatrachus truebae in ventral view (BAR 2720–10). Bones are shown in stippling; dashed lines indicate broken bones. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 8 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 8. Ventral view of the left humerus. A, Llankibatrachus truebae (BAR 2367–1, partially reconstructed). B, Xenopus muelleri (MCZ 1631). 'Xenopus' romeri (DNPM 572, right humerus reversed). Not to scale.

Figure 17 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 17. Dorsal views of the skulls of three anuran taxa. A, Discoglossus sardus (KU 129239). B, Saltenia ibanezi redrawn from Báez (1981: fig. 2). C, Xenopus muelleri (KU 196043). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Spaces between bones are shown in black, cartilage is shown in grey, and bone is shown in white; the pterygoids are stippled. Not to scale.

Figure 26 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 26. Mandibles and hyoid apparatuses of two anuran taxa in ventral view. A, Pipa parva (USNM 115771). B, Silurana tropicalis (KU 195667). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Cartilage is shown in grey, bone is shown in white, and combined grey and stippling denotes calcification. Not to scale.

Figure 23 in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 23. Scapulae of two anuran taxa in ventral view. A, Pipa carvalhoi (MCZ 97277). B, Xenopus laevis (KU 69842). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Not to scale.

Figure 22. Vertebrae I–IV in Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution

Figure 22. Vertebrae I–IV of two anuran taxa in dorsal view. A, Xenopus wittei (KU 195673). B, Rhinophrynus dorsalis (KU 69084). Numbers before the colon indicate the character and numbers after the colon indicate the character state. Spaces between bones are shown in black, cartilage is shown in grey, and bone is shown in white. Not to scale.

Figure 7 in Nanoa, an enigmatic new genus of pimoid spiders from western North America (Pimoidae, Araneae)

Figure 7. One of the eight minimal length trees of 188 steps that result from the analysis of the data matrix presented in the Appendix (CI = 0.53, RI = 0.73). Exclusion of the six parsimony uninformative characters decreases the tree length to 179 steps and the ensemble consistency index to 0.51. Most of the ambiguous character changes are resolved under 'Farris optimization.' Closed circles represent nonhomoplasious character changes. The three nodes that collapse in the strict consensus cladogram of the eight most parsimonious trees (Fig. 6) are marked with a closed rectangle. The basal trichotomy has been resolved according to the araneoid topology presented in Griswold et al. (1998) (see text for details).

Figure 5 in Nanoa, an enigmatic new genus of pimoid spiders from western North America (Pimoidae, Araneae)

Figure 5. Nanoa enana sp. nov. Female. A, epigynum, ventral; B, epigynum, caudoventral; C, epigynum, caudal; D, partially damaged PLS and PMS (PMS cylindrical spigot has shaft broken off; left PLS, on right, has one cylindrical spigot and part of the triplet broken off); E, right PLS triplet with ectal cylindrical spigot; F, prosoma, lateral. See main text for abbreviations.

Figure 4 in Nanoa, an enigmatic new genus of pimoid spiders from western North America (Pimoidae, Araneae)

Figure 4. Nanoa enana sp. nov. Female. A, cheliceral teeth and fang, ventral; B, detail of cephalic region and prosoma, lateral; C, detail of ectal cheliceral side; D, cheliceral teeth, anterior; E, labium and maxillae (arrow points to serrula); F, prosoma, anterior.

Figure 3 in Nanoa, an enigmatic new genus of pimoid spiders from western North America (Pimoidae, Araneae)

Figure 3. Nanoa enana sp. nov. A, male, ventral; B, female, dorsal; C, epigynum, ventral; D, cleared epigynum, ventral (arrow points out to possible location of copulatory opening); E, cleared epigynum, dorsal (arrow points out to distal end of fertilization duct). Scale bars: A, B = 0.5 mm; C–E = 0.1 mm. See main text for abbreviations.

Figure 2 in Nanoa, an enigmatic new genus of pimoid spiders from western North America (Pimoidae, Araneae)

Figure 2. Nanoa enana sp. nov. A–B, male palp, schematic drawings. A, ventral; B, dorsoectal (arrow points out the homologue of alveolar sclerite, seen by transparency through the cymbial cuticle). See main text for abbreviations.

Figure 1 in Nanoa, an enigmatic new genus of pimoid spiders from western North America (Pimoidae, Araneae)

Figure 1. Nanoa enana sp. nov., male palp (embolus in a slightly displaced position; normally its distal end rests tightly against the tegulum, next to the conductor). A, ventral; B, dorsoectal (arrow points out to homologue of alveolar sclerite); C, mesal; D, ectal. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. See main text for abbreviations.

Map 8 in Lichenology in North America, 1947 - 1972.

Map 8: Distributions of Geostiba aucta (filled circles), G. orduica (square), and G. soganlica (open circle) in Turkey.

Map 6 in Lichenology in North America, 1947 - 1972.

Map 6: Distribution of Geostiba lucens (BENICK) in the Eastern Mediterranean region, based on examined records.

Map 5 in Lichenology in North America, 1947 - 1972.

Map 5: Distribution of Geostiba oertzeni (EPPELSHEIM) in the Eastern Mediterranean region, based on examined records.

Map 4 in Lichenology in North America, 1947 - 1972.

Map 4: Distributions of Geostiba solodovnikovi (square), G. elmaica (open circle), and G. priva (filled circle) in Turkey.