Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 33–36 in Description of two new species of Pheles Herrich – Schäffer, [1853] and notes on the taxonomic position of two species hitherto included in the genus (Riodinidae: Riodininae)

FIGURES 33–36. Male genitalia of some species belonging to Pheles Herrich–Schäffer, [1853], Pachythone Bates, 1868 and Melanis Hübner, [1819]. 33. Pheles plaumanni sp. nov., paratype (DZ 21.010). 34. Pheles atricolor atricolor. 35. Pachythone bicolor comb. nov. 36. Melanis caatingensis comb. nov., paratype (DZ 21.059).

FIGURES 1–20 in Description of two new species of Pheles Herrich – Schäffer, [1853] and notes on the taxonomic position of two species hitherto included in the genus (Riodinidae: Riodininae)

FIGURES 1–20. Species belonging to Pheles Herrich–Schäffer, [1853], Pachythone Bates, 1868 and Melanis Hübner, [1819], dorsal and ventral. 1–4. Pheles plaumanni sp. nov. 1–2. Male holotype, Nova Teutônia, Seara, Santa Catarina, Brazil (DZ 28.363). 3–4. Female allotype, Nova Teutônia, Seara, Santa Catarina, Brazil (DZ 28.344). 5–12. Pheles atricolor atricolor. 5–8. Typical phenotype pattern from Atlantic ombrophilous dense forest and Araucaria moist forest. 5–6. Male, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil (DZ 28.294). 7–8. Female, Cedro, Antonina, Paraná, Brazil (DZ 28.312). 9–12. Phenotype pattern from Cerrado and Atlantic semideciduous forest. 9–10. Male, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil (DZ 26.412). 11–12. Female, Fazenda Água Limpa, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil (DZ 28.316). 13–14. Pheles obscura sp. nov. female holotype, Piên, Paraná, Brazil (DZ 30.136). 15–16. Pachythone bicolor comb. nov. male, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil (DZ 28.362). 17–20. Melanis caatingensis comb. nov. 17–18. Male paratype, Brejo Santo, Ceará, Brazil (DZ 31.899). 19–20. Female paratype, Brejo Santo, Ceará, Brazil (DZ 31.938).

FIGURES 21–32 in Description of two new species of Pheles Herrich – Schäffer, [1853] and notes on the taxonomic position of two species hitherto included in the genus (Riodinidae: Riodininae)

FIGURES 21–32. Male head of some species belonging to Pheles Herrich–Schäffer, [1853], Pachythone Bates, 1868 and Melanis Hübner, [1819], frontal and lateral. 21–22. Pheles plaumanni sp. nov. 23–26. Pheles atricolor atricolor. 23–24. Typical phenotype pattern from Atlantic ombrophilous dense forest and Araucaria moist forest. 25–26. Phenotype pattern from Cerrado and Atlantic semideciduous forest. 27–28. Pheles obscura sp. nov. 29–30. Pachythone bicolor comb. nov. 31–32. Melanis caatingensis comb. nov.

FIGURE 2 in On the systematic position of Electrocrania Kusnezov, 1941 with the description of a new species from Baltic amber (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae)

FIGURE 2. Morphological details of E. michalskii: A) venation, B) head, laterally, C) antennal segments with ascoid sensillae from mid-antenna.

FIGURE 1 in On the systematic position of Electrocrania Kusnezov, 1941 with the description of a new species from Baltic amber (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae)

FIGURE 1. Holotype of E. michalskii: Baltic region, Baltic amber, Eocene, Lutetian, in coll. Michael Kurz (photo by courtesy of Michalski Artur).

FIGURE 5 in Phylogenetic positions of four hypotrichous ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora) based on SSU rRNA gene, with notes on their morphological characters

FIGURE 5. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree based on SSU rRNA sequences showing the position of Rigidohymena inquieta, Pattersoniella vitiphila, Notohymena australis and Cyrtohymena (Cyrtohymenides) australis (in bold). Numbers at nodes are the bootstrap values from ML and the posterior probabilities from BI. Accession numbers are provided after species names. Asterisks at nodes indicate disagreement between the two methods. Arrows indicate the first included sequences. Bar, 1 substitution 100nt positions. Urostyla grandis and Anteholosticha multistilata are the outgroup taxa.

FIGURE 3 in Phylogenetic positions of four hypotrichous ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora) based on SSU rRNA gene, with notes on their morphological characters

FIGURE 3. Notohymena australis from life (A–E) and after staining with protargol (F, G). A, B. Ventral (A) and dorsal (B) view of typical individual, showing the cortical granules that arranged in rows on dorsal side (arrowheads in B). C, E. Details of cortical granules on dorsal side, showing the different clusters (arrowheads). D. Lateral view of cortical granules (arrowheads). F. Anterior part of ventral infraciliature, arrowhead depicts the curve at the anterior end of paroral membrane. G. Ventral view of infraciliature, arrowhead refers to the multiple caudal cirri. Scale bars = 40 Μm.

FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic positions of four hypotrichous ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora) based on SSU rRNA gene, with notes on their morphological characters

FIGURE 2. Photomicrographs of Pattersoniella vitiphila in vivo (A–D) and after staining with protargol (E–G). A, B. Ventral view of two cells, showing the cirri on ventral side (A) and the contractile vacuole (B, arrow); C. Details of membranelles and their basal fibers (arrows); D. Frontal cirri and their well-developed associated basal fibers; E. Details of oral structure, showing the basal fibers of cirri; F. Dorsal kinetids and associated fibers; G. Ventral infraciliature. Scale bars: A, B = 180 Μm, G = 75 Μm.

FIGURE 1 in Phylogenetic positions of four hypotrichous ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora) based on SSU rRNA gene, with notes on their morphological characters

FIGURE 1. Rigidohymena inquieta from life (A, F–K) and after staining with protargol (D, E, L). A. Ventral view of living cells; B, C, L. Ventral (B, L) and dorsal (C) view of infraciliature; D, E. Ventral and dorsal view during later stage of reorganization; F, G. Ventral view of two typical individuals, arrow in G marks the contractile vacuole; G. Showing the crystals in cytoplasm; H. Showing the membranelles of adoral zone (arrowhead) and the transverse cirri (arrow); I. Details of oral structure, arrowhead marks the anteriorly curved Cyrtohymena-like paroral membrane; J. The collar part of adoral zone of membrane; K. Cyst; FC, frontal cirri; LMR, left marginal row; Ma, macronuclei; Mi, micronuclei; PM, paroral membrane; RMR, right marginal row; VC, ventral cirri; TC, transverse cirri. Scale bars = 50 Μm.

FIGURE 4 in Phylogenetic positions of four hypotrichous ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora) based on SSU rRNA gene, with notes on their morphological characters

FIGURE 4. Cyrtohymena (Cyrtohymenides) australis from life (A–D) and after staining with protargol (E–G). A, B. Two typical individuals, showing the body shape and colour. C. Cortical granules on dorsal side, arrows mark the cortical granules that scattered in pellicle. D. Cyst. E. The three anlagen for dorsal kineties of proter (arrowheads). F, G. Four dorsomarginal anlagen of proter (arrowhead, F) and opisthe (arrowhead, G) in the same specimen as in E. Scale bars = 100 Μm (A, B), 30 Μm (D).

FIGURE 2 in Turritopsis fascicularis Fraser, 1943 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa): redescription and discussion of its phylogenetic position within the genus

FIGURE 2. Branching patters of the colony, and multiple views of polyps and tentacle arrangement (all from colony H2).

FIGURE 4 in Turritopsis fascicularis Fraser, 1943 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa): redescription and discussion of its phylogenetic position within the genus

FIGURE 4. Phylogenetic hypothesis based on the 16S mitochondrial gene and constructed using phyML. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values and posterior probabilities in this order phyML/RaxML/MrBayes.

FIGURE 3 in Turritopsis fascicularis Fraser, 1943 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa): redescription and discussion of its phylogenetic position within the genus

FIGURE 3. Medusa buds from (A, C, D, E from colony C14-500; B from colony H7). Size bar: 500 µm in A, B and E, 1 mm in C, 200 µm in D).

FIGURE 1 in Turritopsis fascicularis Fraser, 1943 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa): redescription and discussion of its phylogenetic position within the genus

FIGURE 1. Panoramic of the full colony, polysiphonic branches, and branching patterns (A, B, D, E from colony C14-500; C from colony H2). Size bar: 1mm in B, C and D; 500µm in E.

FIGURE 3 in Morphology and systematic position of Cingula tumidula G. O. Sars, 1878 (Gastropoda: Rissoidae)

FIGURE 3. Details of reproductive anatomy of Pusillina tumidula. A–D. female reproductive system of two specimens from Franz Joseph Land, 44 m, 79º53.4'N, 51º26.06'E, MMBI, no number: A, C. left side; B, D. right side; lobes and seminal receptacle are not visible on B; E. male cephalopodium with penis. BC—bursa copulatrix, L—lobes, probably function in sperm storage, LOG—Lower oviduct gland, PE—penis, SD—seminal duct, SR—seminal receptacle, T—tentacle, UOG—upper oviduct gland. Scale = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 2 in Morphology and systematic position of Cingula tumidula G. O. Sars, 1878 (Gastropoda: Rissoidae)

FIGURE 2. Details of protoconch (A–D) and radula (E–F) of Pusillina tumidula. A–B. Eastern Barents Sea (Pechora Sea), 17.5 m, 69°15.61'N, 57°22.76'E, MMBI, no number; C. Franz Joseph Land, 44 m, 79º53.4'N, 51º26.06'E, MMBI, no number; D. White Sea, 85 m, 66°20'N, 30°E (specimen with costae), ZIN 35667/2; E–F. Dalne-Zelenetskaya Bay, 59 m, 69°07.92'N, 36°05.45'E, MMBI, no number. Scales: A, C–D = 300 µm, В = 50 µm, E = 20 µm, F = 5 µm.

FIGURE 3. Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918 in A redescription of Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918, with comments on subgeneric position of some European taxa (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)

FIGURE 3. Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918. Male (a–e), female (f–g): a. maxillary palp; b. genitalia, ventral view; c–e. parameres, ventral view; f–g. seminal capsules.

FIGURE 2. Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918 in A redescription of Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918, with comments on subgeneric position of some European taxa (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)

FIGURE 2. Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918. Female wing: a. bright field image; b. dark field image.

FIGURE 4 in A redescription of Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918, with comments on subgeneric position of some European taxa (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)

FIGURE 4. Male genitalia (a–b) and ventral apodemes (c–f) of Culicoides: a–b. Culicoides furens Poey, 1853 (from Blanton & Wirth 1979, p. 88, changed); c. C. sahariensis Kieffer, 1923; d. C. saevus Kieffer, 1922; e. C. tauricus Gutsevich, 1959; f. Ceratopogon pictipennis Staeger, 1839.

FIGURE 1. Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918 in A redescription of Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918, with comments on subgeneric position of some European taxa (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)

FIGURE 1. Culicoides griseidorsum Kieffer, 1918. Male wing: a. bright field image; b. dark field image.