Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,105
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,105 results for “Vegetation =”
FIGURE 12 in Vegetation and Flora of the Southern Black Mountains of West-Central Arizona
FIGURE 12. Plants restricted to springs in the southern Black Mountains. Plants of Mimulus verbenaceus and Aquilegia chrysantha at Columbine Spring (top). Aquilegia chrysantha (center left; photo by Max Licher, SEINet). Castilleja minor subsp. spiralis (middle center). Plant of Zeltnera arizonica (bottom right). Flower of Zeltnera arizonica (bottom left). Flowers of Mimulus verbenaceus (bottom center). Photos by the authors, except as noted.
FIGURE 9 in Vegetation and Flora of the Southern Black Mountains of West-Central Arizona
FIGURE 9. Some conspicuous plants in the southern Black Mountains-2. Castilleja chromosa (top left). Fallugia paradoxa (top right). Eucnide urens (center left). Mimulus bigelovii (center right). Thamnosma montana (bottom left; photo by P. Alexander, SEINet). Oenothera caespitosa subsp. marginata (bottom right). Photos by the authors, except as noted.
FIGURE 4 in Vegetation and Flora of the Southern Black Mountains of West-Central Arizona
FIGURE 4. Species in the southern Black Mountains that occur in both Mohave and Sonoran deserts-2. Fouqueria splendens (top). Janusia gracilis (bottom left). Mentzelia involucrata (middle center; photo by P. Alexander, SEINet). Trixis californica (bottom center). Dudleya arizonica (bottom right). Photos by the authors, except as noted.
Figure 7 from: Biscotti N, Bonsanto D, Viscio GD (2018) The traditional food use of wild vegetables in Apulia (Italy) in the light of Italian ethnobotanical literature. Italian Botanist 5: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/ib.5.22297
Figure 7 Number of wild species used in Italian regions: in blue the taxa in Guarrera (2006b) are shown; red bars show data from the present work, based on several recent analyses of Italian Regions (2006–2017).
Figure 2 from: Biscotti N, Bonsanto D, Viscio GD (2018) The traditional food use of wild vegetables in Apulia (Italy) in the light of Italian ethnobotanical literature. Italian Botanist 5: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/ib.5.22297
Figure 2 In the background the Apulian districts: Gargano (C1), Tavoliere delle Puglia (C2), Dauni Mountains for the province of Foggia (C3); Land of Bari murgiana (C4) and Terra di Bari (C5) for the province of Barletta-Andria-Trani and Bari; Valle d'Itria (C6) and Salento for the province of Brindisi and Lecce (C7); Ionic tarantine arch for the province of Taranto (C8). In the foreground red areas the study areas (15) for each district.
Figure 6 from: Biscotti N, Bonsanto D, Viscio GD (2018) The traditional food use of wild vegetables in Apulia (Italy) in the light of Italian ethnobotanical literature. Italian Botanist 5: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/ib.5.22297
Figure 6 Cluster analysis of spontaneous species used in the eight districts of Puglia C1 Gargano C2 Tavoliere delle Puglie C3 Monti Dauni C4 Terra di Bari Murgiana C5 Terra di Bari premurgiana C6 Valle d'Itria C7 Salento C8 Arco ionico tarantino.
Figure 5 from: Biscotti N, Bonsanto D, Viscio GD (2018) The traditional food use of wild vegetables in Apulia (Italy) in the light of Italian ethnobotanical literature. Italian Botanist 5: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/ib.5.22297
Figure 5 Comparison of the biological forms of wild species used in Italy (left) and in Apulia (right), expressed as percentage. T therophyte G geophyte H hemicryptophyte CH chamephyte P phanerophyte
Figure 4 from: Biscotti N, Bonsanto D, Viscio GD (2018) The traditional food use of wild vegetables in Apulia (Italy) in the light of Italian ethnobotanical literature. Italian Botanist 5: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/ib.5.22297
Figure 4 Comparison among families of wild species used in Italy (blue) and in Apulia (red) by number.
Supplementary material 4 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
: Explanation note: Supplementary table 4.
Supplementary material 3 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
: Explanation note: Supplementary table 3.
Supplementary material 1 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
: Explanation note: Supplementary figures.
Supplementary material 2 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
: Explanation note: Supplementary tables 1, 2 and 5.
Fig 6 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
Fig 6 Cluster analysis dendrograms showing site and grazing treatment similarities of grasshopper species compositions; A. Spring; B. Fall.
Fig 2 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
Fig 2 Annual average (12 months/year) temperatures at each of the study sites over the five-year study period.
Fig 1 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
Fig 1 Total annual precipitation (January-December) at each of the study sites over the five-year study period.
Fig 5 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
Fig 5 Cluster analysis dendrograms of grasshopper species similarities based on substrate use among all grasshopper species over all sites, years and seasons; A. Based on specific substrate use to the plant species level and bare soil; B. Based on substrates categorized to forbs, grasses, shrubs and bare soil.
Fig 4 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
Fig 4 Examples of each grasshopper life-form type; A. Arbusticole; Bootettix argentatus on Larrea tridentata; B. Graminicole; Paropomala pallida on Bouteloua eriopoda; C. Terri-graminicole; Phlibostroma quadrimaculatum; D. Herbicole; Tropidolophus formosus on Spharalcea hastulata; E. Terricole; Trimerotropis pallidipennis.
Fig 3 from: Lightfoot DC (2018) The effects of livestock grazing and climate variation on vegetation and grasshopper communities in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.19945
Fig 3 Cluster analysis dendrogram showing the similarities of plant species compositions at sites and grazed and not grazed transects within sites, from annual canopy cover/m2 averaged over all years and seasons; A. Spring; B. Fall.
Supplementary material 1 from: Winiger N, Korner P, Arlettaz R, Jacot A (2018) Vegetation structure and decreased moth abundance limit the recolonisation of restored habitat by the European Nightjar. Rethinking Ecology 3: 25-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/rethinkingecology.3.29338
Site and moth data : Explanation note: Details about the study sites and moths.
Figure 7 from: Almeida RF, Guesdon IR, Pace MR, Meira RMS (2019) Taxonomic revision of Mcvaughia W.R.Anderson (Malpighiaceae): notes on vegetative and reproductive anatomy and the description of a new species. PhytoKeys 117: 45-72. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.117.32207
Figure 7 Mcvaughiapiauhiensis. A seasonally dry forests from Serra das Confusões, Piauí, Brazil B abaxial surface of a leaf C detail of epipetiolar stipules D inflorescence E rehydrated flower showing the stamens (white arrows= reduced stamens) and styles. A by S.E. Martins B–E by R.F. Almeida.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.