Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
19,293
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
19,293 results for “western”
Fig. 4 in The eoorthid brachiopod Apheoorthina in the Lower Ordovician of NW Argentina and the dispersal pathways along western Gondwana
Fig. 4. Early Ordovician palaeogeographic reconstruction showing inferred marine current pattern and possible dispersal routes between the Central Andean Basin, northern Africa, and European-Asian peri-Gondwanan terranes. Considering their position in the Ordovician maps, the names "East" and "West" Iapetus are proposed to replace the commonly used "North" and "South" Iapetus. ATA, Armorican Terrane Assemblage; CAB, Central Andean Basin. Palaeogeography based on Benedetto and Sánchez (1996), Astini (1998), Benedetto (2003), Fortey and Cocks (2003), Ramos (2009), Cocks and Torsvik (2013), and Torsvik and Cocks (2013a, b). Oceanic current pattern based on Pohl et al. (2015).
Fig. 5 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania
Fig. 5. Greatest length vs. width for the lower (A, N = 74) and upper (B, N = 105) cave bear canines from Urşilor (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP).
Fig. 6 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania
Fig. 6. Percentage of juveniles vs. females (A) and old individuals vs. males (B) of cave bears from Urşilor, (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP). Data derived from SOM: tables 3 and 4.
Fig. 3 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania
Fig. 3. Tripolar graphs showing the distribution of the teeth and mandibles (A) of cave bears from Urşilor (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP) in the three main age categories (according to Stiner 1994); and distribution of age classes (B) from different cave bear sites in the three main age categories, as proposed by Stiner (1994): NNVA (Normal Non-Violent Assemblage), grey dashed polygon; LS (Living age Structure), black dashed polygon.
Fig. 2 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania
Fig. 2. Mortality profile of cave bears from Urşilor (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP). A. Right M1 (N = 44). B. Right M2 (N = 36). C. Left mandible (N = 82).
Fig. 1 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania
Fig. 1. Geographic localization (A) and plan (C) of Urşilor Cave of Chişcău. B. Long profile (section) of the Excavation Chamber from the Scientific Reserve. D. Plan of the lower level of the cave (= Scientific Reserve).
Fig. 4 in Fossil population structure and mortality analysis of the cave bears from Urşilor Cave, north-western Romania
Fig. 4.Transverse diameters of all of the adult lower (A, N = 74) and upper (B, N = 105) cave bear canines from Urşilor (~45–40 calendar kyrs BP).
Fig. 7 in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 7. SEM images of protoconch features of conoidean gastropods from early Serravallian of western Ukraine, Varovtsi (A, C–F) and Horodok (B). A. Bela? robusta sp. nov., MGGC-24519/8. B. Pyrgocythara turrispiralata sp. nov., MGGC-24515/11. C. Raphitoma cf. R. ringicula (Boettger, 1902), MGGC-24522/5. D. Andonia sp. aff. A. transsylvanica (Hoernes and Auinger, 1890), MGGC 24523/2. E. Teretia cf. T. turritelloides Bellardi, 1847), MGGC-24524/5. F. Haedropleura sp. aff. H. septangularis (Montagu, 1803), MGGC-24520/6. Views: A1, B1, C–F, lateral; A2, B2, apical. Scale bars 0.1 mm.
Fig. 6 in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 6. Photomicrographs of holotype shell of new conoidean gastropods from early Serravallian of western Ukraine, Varovtsi (A, B) and Horodok (C). A. Bela varovtsiana sp. nov., MGGC-24516. B. Bela? robusta sp. nov., MGGC-24518. C. Pyrgocythara turrispiralata sp. nov., MGGC-24514. Views: A1−C1, apertural; A2−C2, dorsal; A3−C3, lateral. Scale bars 1 mm.
Fig. 4 in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 4. SEM images of protoconch features of new conoidean gastropods from early Serravallian of western Ukraine, Varovtsi (A–C, F) and Velyka Levada (E). A. Mangelia angulicosta sp. nov., MGGC 24506/6. B. Mangelia larga sp. nov., MGGC-24508/1. C. Mangelia larga sp. nov., MGGC-24508/7. D. Mangelia pseudorugulosa sp. nov., MGGC-24510/9. E. Mangelia odovychenae sp. nov., MGGC-24512/1. F. Bela varovtsiana sp. nov., MGGC-24517/5. Views: A1, B, D1−F1, lateral; A2, C, D2−F2, apical. Scale bars 0.1 mm.
Fig. 3 in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of holotype shells of new conoidean gastropods from early Serravallian of western Ukraine, Varovtsi (A–C) and Velyka Levada (D). A. Mangelia angulicosta sp. nov., MGGC-24505. B. Mangelia larga sp. nov., MGGC-24507. C. Mangelia pseudorugulosa sp. nov., MGGC-24509. D. Mangelia odovychenae sp. nov., MGGC-24511. Views: A1−D1, apertural; A2−D2, dorsal; A3−D3, lateral. Scale bars 1 mm.
Fig. 2 in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 2. Comparison of 10 assessed variables between allied taxa: sample mean, horizontal line; 95% confidence intervals (CI), shaded boxes; ranges, open boxes (specimen measurements in SOM 2). The mean sample is a point estimate of the population mean (μ), and the corresponding CI is a range of plausible values for μ. If two parameters have non-overlapping CI, they are considered to be significantly different. The 95% confidence interval is based on the standard error for the estimate of the mean and the t distribution. For extremely small samples (n <5; SOM 2) only ranges are reported (see Beninger et al. 2012). Abbreviations: M., Mangelia; B., Bela; P., Pyrgocythara; H., Haedropleura.
Fig. 1. A in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 1. A. Schematic map of Ukraine and the location of the study area. B. Distribution of the principal lithostratigraphic units in the area of study and location of the three sampled sites (asterisks).
Fig. 8 in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 8. SEM images of shell features of conoidean gastropods from early Serravallian of western Ukraine, Horodok (A, B) and Varovtsi (C–J). A, B. Pyrgocythara turrispiralata sp. nov. A. MGGC-24515/11. B. MGGC-24515/9. C, D. Raphitoma cf. R. ringicula (Boettger, 1902). C. MGGC-24522/1. D. MGGC-24522/3. E, F. Andonia sp. aff. A. transsilvanica (Hoernes and Auinger, 1890). E. MGGC-24523/1. F. MGGC-24523/3. G, H. Teretia cf. T. turritelloides (Bellardi, 1847). G. MGGC-24524/3. H. MGGC-24524/5. I, J. Haedropleura sp. aff. H. septangularis (Montagu, 1803). I. MGGC-24520/6. J. MGGC-24520/11. Views: A1, C1, E1, G1, I1, apertural; B, D, E2, H, I2, dorsal; A2, C2, F, G2, J, lateral. Scale bars 1 mm.
Fig. 5 in Middle Miocene conoidean gastropods from western Ukraine (Paratethys): Integrative taxonomy, palaeoclimatogical and palaeobiogeographical implications
Fig. 5. SEM images of shell features of new conoidean gastropods from early Serravallian of western Ukraine, Varovtsi (A–E, I–M), Horodok (G), and Velyka Levada (F, H). A. Mangelia angulicosta sp. nov., MGGC-24506/6. B–D. Mangelia larga sp. nov. B. MGGC-24508/11. C. MGGC-24508/1. D. MGGC-24508/12. E. Mangelia pseudorugulosa sp. nov., MGGC-24510/9. F–H. Mangelia odovychenae sp. nov. F. MGGC-24512/1. G. MGGC- 24512/10. H. MGGC-24512/topotype. I–K. Bela varovtsiana sp. nov. I. MGGC-24517/8. J. MGGC-24517/5. K. MGGC-24517/6. L, M. Bela? robusta sp. nov. L. MGGC-24519/8. M. MGGC-24519/1. Views: A1–L1, B, F, I, apertural; A2−L2, C, G, J, dorsal; A3, D, E3, H, K, M, lateral. Scale bars 1 mm.
Fig. 4 in A new species of the neopterygian fish Enchodus from the Duwi Formation, Campanian, Late Cretaceous, Western Desert, central Egypt
Fig. 4. Majority rule consensus of 222 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 263, CI = 0.53, HI = 0.47, RI = 0.75, and RC = 0.4). Numbers next to branches indicate the percentage of trees in which each clade is present.
Fig. 3 in A new species of the neopterygian fish Enchodus from the Duwi Formation, Campanian, Late Cretaceous, Western Desert, central Egypt
Fig. 3. Digital reconstructions of the aulopiform teleost Enchodus tineidae sp. nov. holotype (MUVP 59) from the Campanian of central Egypt. Right dentary showing its caudal extent, otherwise obscured by matrix, in lateral (A) and medial (B) views. Caudal portion of the left anguloarticular in lateral view (C), showing its dorsal aspect, otherwise obscured by matrix. Right ectopterygoid showing its caudal extent and dorsal aspect, otherwise obscured by matrix, in lateral (D), caudodorsal (E), showing V-shaped trough for articulation with the dermopalatine, and medial (F) views. Abbreviations: d, dentary tooth; E, ectopterygoid tooth; numbers 1–13 indicate tooth position in the respective bone.
Fig. 2 in A new species of the neopterygian fish Enchodus from the Duwi Formation, Campanian, Late Cretaceous, Western Desert, central Egypt
Fig. 2. Aulopiform teleost Enchodus tineidae sp. nov. holotype (MUVP 59) from the Campanian of central Egypt. A, B. Photographs of specimen in lateral (A1) and medial (B1) views; photographs with identifiable elements outlined, in lateral (A2) and medial (B2) views. C. Close up of denticles of the lateral tooth row.
Fig. 7 in A new Oligocene site with terrestrial mammals and a selachian fauna from Minqar Tibaghbagh, the Western Desert of Egypt
Fig. 7. Bivariate plots of Phiomia sp. cheek teeth from the BOTM, early Oligocene, Minqar Tibaghbagh, Qattara Depression, Egypt (stars) compared with Phiomia spp. from the early Oligocene Jebel Qatrani Formation, Fayum Depression, Egypt (diamonds) and Phiomia major from the late Oligocene, Chilga Formation of the Chilga Region, Ethiopia (triangles). Comparative dimensions of Phiomia serridens from Matsumoto (1924: 48, tables B, C, E, G); dimensions of Phiomia major from Sanders et al. (2004: table 2). A. M3? (or M2?) and M3?, originally the latter molar would have been larger in width (see text). B. m3, the width is based on estimated dimensions.
Fig. 12. A–C in A new Oligocene site with terrestrial mammals and a selachian fauna from Minqar Tibaghbagh, the Western Desert of Egypt
Fig. 12. A–C. Carcharhiniformes and Myliobatiformes from the BOTM, early Oligocene, Minqar Tibaghbagh, Qattara Depression, Egypt; photographed and left in the field. A. Carcharhinus sp., incomplete upper tooth in lingual view. B, C. "Aetobatus" sp. B. Lower tooth in occlusal (B1) and basal (B2) views. C. Lower tooth in occlusal view. D–M. Carcharhiniformes and Lamniformes from the BOS, early Oligocene, Minqar Tibaghbagh, Qattara Depression, Egypt. D. Hemipristis cf. serra Agassiz, 1835 (1843) (CGM67195), upper lateral teeth in lingual (D1, D2, D4) and labial (D3) views. E. Carcharhinus cf. perseus Adnet, Antoine, Hassan Baqri, Crochet, Marivaux, Welcomme, and Métais, 2007 (CGM67194), upper antero-lateral teeth in lingual view. F. Carcharhinus sp. (CGM67195), upper teeth in lingual (F1, F4, F5, F6) and labial (F2, F3) views. G. Negaprion frequens (Dames, 1883) (CGM67191), lower teeth in lingual (G1, G3, G4) and lateral (G2, G5) views. H. Galeocerdo sp. (CGM67195) in lingual view. I–L. Otodus (Carcharocles) cf. sokolowi. I. CGM67195, upper tooth in lingual view. J. CGM69186 upper tooth in lingual (J1) and labial (J2) views. K. CGM69186, lower tooth in labial view. L. CGM69186, lower tooth in lingual (L1) and labial (L2) views. M. Carcharias? sp. (CGM67195), lower teeth in lateral (M1) and lingual (M2) views.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.