Find research datasets worth reusing

Supplementary material 5 from: Hong SC, Magarey RD, Borchert DM, Vargas RI, Souder SK (2015) Site-specific temporal and spatial validation of a generic plant pest forecast system with observations of Bactrocera dorsalis (oriental fruit fly). NeoBiota 27: 37-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5177

Figure S2: Explanation note: Fit of high temperature mortality function (line) to observations (diamonds).

Supplementary material 1 from: Hong SC, Magarey RD, Borchert DM, Vargas RI, Souder SK (2015) Site-specific temporal and spatial validation of a generic plant pest forecast system with observations of Bactrocera dorsalis (oriental fruit fly). NeoBiota 27: 37-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5177

Table S1: Explanation note: List of references for oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis) distribution.

Supplementary material 3 from: Hong SC, Magarey RD, Borchert DM, Vargas RI, Souder SK (2015) Site-specific temporal and spatial validation of a generic plant pest forecast system with observations of Bactrocera dorsalis (oriental fruit fly). NeoBiota 27: 37-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5177

Table S3: Explanation note: Summary statistics of low and high temperature mortality of Bactrocera dorsalis.

Supplementary material 2 from: Hong SC, Magarey RD, Borchert DM, Vargas RI, Souder SK (2015) Site-specific temporal and spatial validation of a generic plant pest forecast system with observations of Bactrocera dorsalis (oriental fruit fly). NeoBiota 27: 37-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5177

Table S2: Explanation note: List of references for Bactrocera invadens distribution (Courtesy to Marc De Meyer, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium).

FIGURE 5. Taphura dolabella n in Generic redescription, seven new species and a key to the Taphura Stål, 1862 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadetttinae: Taphurini)

FIGURE 5. Taphura dolabella n. sp.: A, holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, paratype male lateral view of genitalia; G, paratype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C, 0.5 mm; D–G, 1 mm; H–I, 2 mm.

FIGURE 2. Taphura cernuunca n in Generic redescription, seven new species and a key to the Taphura Stål, 1862 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadetttinae: Taphurini)

FIGURE 2. Taphura cernuunca n. sp.: A, holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C, 0.5 mm; D–G, 1 mm; H–I, 2 mm.

FIGURE 6. Taphura lanceola n in Generic redescription, seven new species and a key to the Taphura Stål, 1862 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadetttinae: Taphurini)

FIGURE 6. Taphura lanceola n. sp.: A, holotype male habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; F, holotype male posterior view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C, 0.5 mm; D–F, 1 mm.

FIGURE 4. Taphura demissa n in Generic redescription, seven new species and a key to the Taphura Stål, 1862 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadetttinae: Taphurini)

FIGURE 4. Taphura demissa n. sp.: A, holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C, 0.5 mm; D–G, 1 mm; H–I, 2 mm.

FIGURE 3. Taphura crispula n in Generic redescription, seven new species and a key to the Taphura Stål, 1862 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadetttinae: Taphurini)

FIGURE 3. Taphura crispula n. sp.: A, holotype male habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; F, holotype male posterior view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C, 0.5 mm; D–F, 1 mm.

FIGURE 7. Taphura maccagnani n in Generic redescription, seven new species and a key to the Taphura Stål, 1862 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadetttinae: Taphurini)

FIGURE 7. Taphura maccagnani n. sp.: A, holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C, 0.5 mm; D–G, 1 mm; H–I, 2 mm.

FIGURE 1. Taphura attiguclava n in Generic redescription, seven new species and a key to the Taphura Stål, 1862 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cicadetttinae: Taphurini)

FIGURE 1. Taphura attiguclava n. sp.: A, holotype male and paratype female habitus; B, holotype male dorsum; C, holotype male timbal cover; D, paratype male operculum; E, paratype female operculum; F, holotype male lateral view of genitalia; G, holotype male posterior view of genitalia; H, paratype female lateral view of genitalia; I, paratype female ventral view of genitalia. Scale bar: A, 2 cm; B, 2 mm; C, 0.5 mm; D–G, 1 mm; H–I, 2 mm.

FIGURES 41–52 in Revision of the Venezuelan spider genus Stenosfemuraia González-Sponga, with new generic and specific synonymies (Araneae, Pholcidae)

FIGURES 41–52. Stenosfemuraia parva (41–44, ZFMK Ar 18251), S. cuadrata (45–48, ZFMK Ar 18253) and S. pilosa (49– 52, ZFMK Ar 18254). Genital bulb processes (all at same scale) in dorsal (41, 45, 49) and ventral (42, 46, 50) views. Palpal tarsus and procursus (all at same scale) in prolateral (43, 47, 51) and dorsal (44, 48, 52) views. Scale lines: 0.3.

FIGURES 28–34 in Revision of the Venezuelan spider genus Stenosfemuraia González-Sponga, with new generic and specific synonymies (Araneae, Pholcidae)

FIGURES 28–34. Stenosfemuraia pilosa, ZFMK Ar 18254. 28–31. Male and female, dorsal and lateral views. 32–33. Epigynum, ventral and lateral views. 34. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view (arrows: lateral sclerites/'wings').

FIGURES 2–8 in Revision of the Venezuelan spider genus Stenosfemuraia González-Sponga, with new generic and specific synonymies (Araneae, Pholcidae)

FIGURES 2–8. Stenosfemuraia parva, ZFMK Ar 18251. 2–5. Male and female, dorsal and lateral views. 6–7. Epigynum, ventral and lateral views. 8. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view (arrows: lateral sclerites/'wings').

FIGURES 22–27 in Revision of the Venezuelan spider genus Stenosfemuraia González-Sponga, with new generic and specific synonymies (Araneae, Pholcidae)

FIGURES 22–27. Stenosfemuraia cuadrata, ZFMK Ar 18253. 22–23. Left pedipalp, prolateral and retrolateral views. 24. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 25–26. Epigynum, lateral and ventral views. 27. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view. Scale lines: 0.3.

FIGURES 15–21 in Revision of the Venezuelan spider genus Stenosfemuraia González-Sponga, with new generic and specific synonymies (Araneae, Pholcidae)

FIGURES 15–21. Stenosfemuraia cuadrata, ZFMK Ar 18253. 15–18. Male and female, dorsal and lateral views. 19–20. Epigynum, ventral and lateral views. 21. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view (arrows: lateral sclerites/'wings').

FIGURES 9–14 in Revision of the Venezuelan spider genus Stenosfemuraia González-Sponga, with new generic and specific synonymies (Araneae, Pholcidae)

FIGURES 9–14. Stenosfemuraia parva, ZFMK Ar 18251. 9–10. Left pedipalp, prolateral and retrolateral views (b, genital bulb; c, coxa; f, femur; p, procursus; ta, tarsus; ti, tibia; tr, trochanter). 11. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 12–13. Epigynum, lateral and ventral views. 14. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view. Scale lines: 0.3.

FIGURES 35–40 in Revision of the Venezuelan spider genus Stenosfemuraia González-Sponga, with new generic and specific synonymies (Araneae, Pholcidae)

FIGURES 35–40. Stenosfemuraia pilosa, ZFMK Ar 18254. 35–36. Left pedipalp, prolateral and retrolateral views. 37. Male chelicerae, frontal view. 38–39. Epigynum, lateral and ventral views. 40. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view. Scale lines: 0.3.

FIGURES 12–13 in On the identity of Photophilus Folkmanová, 1928: A new generic synonymy (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae)

FIGURES 12–13. Photographs of liVing Geophilus carpophagus Leach, 1814 specimens. 12: female from Sardinia (Italy) With typical greyish colouration (photo by Gonzalo Giribet and Gregory D. Edgecombe); 13: specimens from Usedom Island (Germany) shoWing aggregation (characteristically sWollen ultimate legs of males indicated by arroWs) (photo by Norman Lindner).

FIGURES 8–11 in On the identity of Photophilus Folkmanová, 1928: A new generic synonymy (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Geophilidae)

FIGURES 8–11. FolkmanoVÁ's draWings illustrating the completeness of the forcipular chitin-lines in Photophilus griseus FolkmanoVÁ, 1928 and Pachymerium ferrugineum (C.L. Koch, 1835) compared With original draWings on Pachymerium ferrugineum (C.L. Koch, 1835) and Geophilus carpophagus Leach, 1814. 8: P. griseus forcipule interpreting chitin-lines as complete (arroW) (after FolkmanoVÁ 1928: fig. 77); 9: Pa. ferrugineum forcipule interpreting chitin-lines as complete (arroW) (after FolkmanoVÁ 1928: fig. 68); 10: Pa. ferrugineum forcipule With the real, incomplete state of the chitin-lines (arroW); 11: G. carpophagus forcipule With incomplete chitin-lines (arroW).